Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] fs/9p: don't set SB_NOATIME by default

[jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>]

On 2018/2/24 10:47, jiangyiwen wrote:
> On 2018/2/9 14:13, jiangyiwen wrote:
>> User use some syscall, for example mmap(v9fs_file_mmap), it will not
>> update atime even if user's mnt_flags have MNT_NOATIME, because
>> v9fs default set SB_NOATIME in v9fs_set_super.
>>
>> For supporting access time is updated when user mount with relatime,
>> we should clear SB_NOATIME by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/9p/vfs_super.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
>> index af03c2a..48ce504 100644
>> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
>> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_super.c
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int v9fs_set_super(struct super_block *s, void *data)
>>  	if (v9ses->cache)
>>  		sb->s_bdi->ra_pages = (VM_MAX_READAHEAD * 1024)/PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>> -	sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE | SB_DIRSYNC | SB_NOATIME;
>> +	sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE | SB_DIRSYNC;
>>  	if (!v9ses->cache)
>>  		sb->s_flags |= SB_SYNCHRONOUS;
>>
> Hi Alexander Viro and Eric,
> 
> My patch has already sent two weeks, but nobody help me
> to review, I have a question about now who is the v9fs's
> maintainer? Or who can help me review the patch?
> 
> I hope v9fs's maintainer can give me some advices or
> merge into the mainline if it has no problem.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yiwen.
> 
Hi Andrew,

My patch has already sent more than two weeks, but nobody
help me to review, I have a question about now who is the
v9fs's maintainer? Or who can help me review the patch?

I hope v9fs's maintainer can give me some advices or
merge into the mainline if it has no problem.

Thanks,
Yiwen.