[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] Correct a comment error

[piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com>]

Hi Larry,

There is the same mistake in ocfs2_reflink_inodes_lock(), could you help
fixing them all?

thanks,
Jun

On 2018/2/28 18:17, Larry Chen wrote:
> The function ocfs2_double_lock tries to lock the inode with lower
> blockid first, not lockid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Larry Chen <lchen@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> index c801eddc4bf3..30d454de35a8 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
> @@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ static int ocfs2_double_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
>  	if (*bh2)
>  		*bh2 = NULL;
>  
> -	/* we always want to lock the one with the lower lockid first.
> +	/* we always want to lock the one with the lower blockid first.
>  	 * and if they are nested, we lock ancestor first */
>  	if (oi1->ip_blkno != oi2->ip_blkno) {
>  		inode1_is_ancestor = ocfs2_check_if_ancestor(osb, oi2->ip_blkno,
>