From: Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@ORACLE.COM>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
idan.brown@ORACLE.COM, yuval.shaia@ORACLE.COM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet's per-netns info only when crossing netns
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:11:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5AB132C5.5010806@ORACLE.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180320.120036.1999626754164343704.davem@davemloft.net>
On 20/03/18 18:00, David Miller wrote:
> From: Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@ORACLE.COM>
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:34:38 +0200
>
>> I personally don't understand why we should maintain
>> backwards-comparability to this behaviour.
>
> The reason is because not breaking things is a cornerstone of Linux
> kernel development.
>
>> This feature is not documented to user-mode and I don't see why it
>> is legit for the user to rely on it.
>
> Whether it is documented or not is irrelevant. A lot of our
> interfaces and behaviors are not documented or poorly documented
> at best.
>
>> In addition, even if we do want to maintain backwards-comparability to
>> this behaviour, I think it is enough to have an opt-in flag in
>> /proc/sys/net/core/ that when set to 1 will activate the fix in
>> dev_forward_skb() provided by this patch. That would also be a very
>> simple change to the patch provided here.
>
> Making it opt-in makes it more palatable, that's for sure.
>
1. Do we want to make a flag for every bug that is user-space visible? I
think there is place for consideration on a per-case basis. I still
don't see how a user can utilize this behaviour. He is basically loosing
information (skb->mark) without this patch.
2. Having said that, I don't mind changing patch to maintain backwards
compatibility here. However, there was also a discussion here on where
the flag should sit. I think that a global /proc/sys/net/core/ flag
should be enough. Do you agree it's sufficient for now?
Thanks,
-Liran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-13 15:07 [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet's per-netns info only when crossing netns Liran Alon
2018-03-13 16:13 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-03-14 12:03 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-03-15 9:21 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 11:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 12:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 15:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 15:54 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 17:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-20 14:47 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 15:34 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:00 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 16:11 ` Liran Alon [this message]
2018-03-20 16:34 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 16:39 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 18:51 ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-03-20 21:12 ` Liran Alon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-15 12:14 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 12:23 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 14:35 ` Roman Mashak
2018-03-15 14:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 15:01 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:11 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 15:05 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:35 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 17:14 Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-20 16:44 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 17:07 ` Ben Greear
2018-03-20 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5AB132C5.5010806@ORACLE.COM \
--to=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idan.brown@ORACLE.COM \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuval.shaia@ORACLE.COM \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.