From: Roman Mashak <mrv@mojatatu.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>,
<idan.brown@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet's per-netns info only when crossing netns
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:35:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85woydh0e9.fsf@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be0d17cf-12d5-440c-adee-e943ccb199c9@default> (Liran Alon's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2018 05:23:41 -0700 (PDT)")
Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com> writes:
[...]
>> Overall I think it might be nice to not need scrubbing skb in such
>> cases,
>> although my concern would be that this has potential to break
>> existing
>> setups when they would expect mark being zero on other veth peer in
>> any
>> case since it's the behavior for a long time already. The safer
>> option
>> would be to have some sort of explicit opt-in e.g. on link creation to
>> let
>> the skb->mark pass through unscrubbed. This would definitely be a
>> useful
>> option e.g. when mark is set in the netns facing veth via
>> clsact/egress
>> on xmit and when the container is unprivileged anyway.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>
> I see your point in regards to backwards comparability.
> However, not scrubbing skb when it cross netns via some kernel functions compared to
> others is basically a bug which could easily break with a little bit of more refactoring.
> Therefore, it seems a bit weird to me to from now on, we will force
> every user on link creation to consider that once there was a bug leading
> to this weird behavior on specific netdevs.
> Thus, I suggest to maybe control this via a global /proc/sys/net file instead.
One valid use case could be preserving a source namespace nsid in
skb->mark when a packet crosses netns.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 12:23 [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet's per-netns info only when crossing netns Liran Alon
2018-03-15 14:35 ` Roman Mashak [this message]
2018-03-15 14:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-15 17:14 Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-20 16:44 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 17:07 ` Ben Greear
2018-03-20 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-15 16:35 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 15:05 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 15:01 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:11 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 12:14 Liran Alon
2018-03-13 15:07 Liran Alon
2018-03-13 16:13 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-03-14 12:03 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-03-15 9:21 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 11:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 12:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 15:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 15:54 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 17:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-20 14:47 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 15:34 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:00 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 16:11 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:34 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 16:39 ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 18:51 ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-03-20 21:12 ` Liran Alon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85woydh0e9.fsf@mojatatu.com \
--to=mrv@mojatatu.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idan.brown@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=yuval.shaia@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.