Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Roger Quadros]

Chanwoo,

On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> another bug...
> 
> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp28
 0 bmc150_accel_core
> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> 
> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
> 
> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
> 
> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
> 
> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or

I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
if yes why?

I think we don't want to call all notifiers in atomic context as this would keep interrupts disabled
for quite some time and is suboptimal.

> dwc3_omap_set_mailbox should move dis/enabling regulator to some worker thread so
> that they can block.
> 
> The best would be to make dwc3_omap_set_mailbox call regulator_enable_deferred(omap->vbus_reg, 0)
> but that function does not exist.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> BR,
> Nikolaus
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Roger Quadros]

Chanwoo,

On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> another bug...
> 
> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp280 bmc150_accel_core
> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> 
> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
> 
> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
> 
> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
> 
> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or

I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
if yes why?

I think we don't want to call all notifiers in atomic context as this would keep interrupts disabled
for quite some time and is suboptimal.

> dwc3_omap_set_mailbox should move dis/enabling regulator to some worker thread so
> that they can block.
> 
> The best would be to make dwc3_omap_set_mailbox call regulator_enable_deferred(omap->vbus_reg, 0)
> but that function does not exist.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> BR,
> Nikolaus
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Roger,

On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Chanwoo,
> 
> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>> another bug...
>>
>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp2
 80 bmc150_accel_core
>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>
>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>
>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>
>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>
>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
> 
> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
> if yes why?

To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.

So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
the next registered notifier might receive the notification
with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 

But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
(To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)

I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
with broadcasting way.

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
@@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
                return index;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
-
        state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
 
        /*
         * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
@@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
         */
        raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
 
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
+

> 
> I think we don't want to call all notifiers in atomic context as this would keep interrupts disabled
> for quite some time and is suboptimal.
> 
>> dwc3_omap_set_mailbox should move dis/enabling regulator to some worker thread so
>> that they can block.
>>
>> The best would be to make dwc3_omap_set_mailbox call regulator_enable_deferred(omap->vbus_reg, 0)
>> but that function does not exist.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikolaus
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Roger,

On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Chanwoo,
> 
> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>> another bug...
>>
>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp280 bmc150_accel_core
>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>
>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>
>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>
>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>
>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
> 
> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
> if yes why?

To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.

So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
the next registered notifier might receive the notification
with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 

But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
(To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)

I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
with broadcasting way.

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
@@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
                return index;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
-
        state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
 
        /*
         * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
@@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
         */
        raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
 
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
+

> 
> I think we don't want to call all notifiers in atomic context as this would keep interrupts disabled
> for quite some time and is suboptimal.
> 
>> dwc3_omap_set_mailbox should move dis/enabling regulator to some worker thread so
>> that they can block.
>>
>> The best would be to make dwc3_omap_set_mailbox call regulator_enable_deferred(omap->vbus_reg, 0)
>> but that function does not exist.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikolaus
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Roger Quadros]

On 14/06/18 04:20, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Chanwoo,
>>
>> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>> another bug...
>>>
>>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp
 280 bmc150_accel_core
>>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>
>>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>>
>>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>>
>>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>>
>>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
>>
>> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
>> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
>> if yes why?
> 
> To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.
> 
> So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
> to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
> calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
> if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
> the next registered notifier might receive the notification
> with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 
> 
> But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
> (To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)
> 
> I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
> and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
> with broadcasting way.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>                 return index;
>  
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
> -
>         state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
>  
>         /*
>          * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
> @@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>          */
>         raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
>  
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
> +
> 

Thanks Chanwoo.

Nikolaus, could you please test this patch and give your Reported-by/Tested-by sign off? Thanks.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2

>>
>> I think we don't want to call all notifiers in atomic context as this would keep interrupts disabled
>> for quite some time and is suboptimal.
>>
>>> dwc3_omap_set_mailbox should move dis/enabling regulator to some worker thread so
>>> that they can block.
>>>
>>> The best would be to make dwc3_omap_set_mailbox call regulator_enable_deferred(omap->vbus_reg, 0)
>>> but that function does not exist.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Nikolaus
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Roger Quadros]

On 14/06/18 04:20, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Chanwoo,
>>
>> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>> another bug...
>>>
>>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp280 bmc150_accel_core
>>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>
>>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>>
>>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>>
>>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>>
>>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
>>
>> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
>> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
>> if yes why?
> 
> To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.
> 
> So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
> to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
> calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
> if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
> the next registered notifier might receive the notification
> with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 
> 
> But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
> (To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)
> 
> I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
> and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
> with broadcasting way.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>                 return index;
>  
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
> -
>         state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
>  
>         /*
>          * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
> @@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>          */
>         raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
>  
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
> +
> 

Thanks Chanwoo.

Nikolaus, could you please test this patch and give your Reported-by/Tested-by sign off? Thanks.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2

>>
>> I think we don't want to call all notifiers in atomic context as this would keep interrupts disabled
>> for quite some time and is suboptimal.
>>
>>> dwc3_omap_set_mailbox should move dis/enabling regulator to some worker thread so
>>> that they can block.
>>>
>>> The best would be to make dwc3_omap_set_mailbox call regulator_enable_deferred(omap->vbus_reg, 0)
>>> but that function does not exist.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Nikolaus
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[H. Nikolaus Schaller]

Hi Roger and Chanwoo,

> Am 14.06.2018 um 10:34 schrieb Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>:
> 
> On 14/06/18 04:20, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>> 
>> On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Chanwoo,
>>> 
>>> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>> another bug...
>>>> 
>>>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>>>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp280 bmc150_accel_core
>>>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>>>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>>>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>>>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>>>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>>>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>>>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>>>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>>>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>>>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>>>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>>>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>>>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>>>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>>>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>>>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>>>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>>>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>>>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>>>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>>>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>>>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>>>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>>>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>>>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>>>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>> 
>>>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>>>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>>>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>>> 
>>>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>>>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>>> 
>>>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
>>> 
>>> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
>>> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
>>> if yes why?
>> 
>> To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.
>> 
>> So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
>> to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
>> calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
>> if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
>> the next registered notifier might receive the notification
>> with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 
>> 
>> But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
>> (To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)
>> 
>> I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
>> and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
>> with broadcasting way.
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>> index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>> @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>>                return index;
>> 
>>        spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
>> -
>>        state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
>> 
>>        /*
>>         * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
>> @@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>>         */
>>        raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
>> 
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
>> +
>> 
> 
> Thanks Chanwoo.
> 
> Nikolaus, could you please test this patch and give your Reported-by/Tested-by sign off? Thanks.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2

I have tested on the Pyra handheld prototype and now it works. Plugging in an OTG cable
enables/disables OTG power as expected and there are no kernel oops any more.

So you can add my Reported-by/Tested-by.

BR and thank you for the quick fix,
Nikolaus

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Nikolaus,

On 2018년 06월 14일 18:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Roger and Chanwoo,
> 
>> Am 14.06.2018 um 10:34 schrieb Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>:
>>
>> On 14/06/18 04:20, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> Chanwoo,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>>> another bug...
>>>>>
>>>>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>>>>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c b
 mp280 bmc150_accel_core
>>>>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>>>>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>>>>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>>>>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>>>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>>>>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>>>>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>>>>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>>>>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>>>>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>>>>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>>>>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>>>>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>>>>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>>>>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>>>>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>>>>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>>>>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>>>>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>>>>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>>>>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>>>>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>>>>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>>>>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>>>>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>>>>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>>>>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>>>
>>>>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>>>>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>>>>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>>>>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
>>>>
>>>> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
>>>> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
>>>> if yes why?
>>>
>>> To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.
>>>
>>> So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
>>> to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
>>> calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
>>> if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
>>> the next registered notifier might receive the notification
>>> with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 
>>>
>>> But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
>>> (To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)
>>>
>>> I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
>>> and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
>>> with broadcasting way.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>>>                return index;
>>>
>>>        spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
>>> -
>>>        state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
>>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
>>>
>>>        /*
>>>         * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
>>> @@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>>>         */
>>>        raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
>>>
>>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
>>> +
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Chanwoo.
>>
>> Nikolaus, could you please test this patch and give your Reported-by/Tested-by sign off? Thanks.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2
> 
> I have tested on the Pyra handheld prototype and now it works. Plugging in an OTG cable
> enables/disables OTG power as expected and there are no kernel oops any more.
> 
> So you can add my Reported-by/Tested-by.

Thanks for the test. But, you have to reply your reported/tested-by tag 
to patch[1] because all tags should be remained on lkml.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Nikolaus,

On 2018년 06월 14일 18:58, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Roger and Chanwoo,
> 
>> Am 14.06.2018 um 10:34 schrieb Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>:
>>
>> On 14/06/18 04:20, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On 2018년 06월 11일 17:53, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> Chanwoo,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/06/18 11:33, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>>> another bug...
>>>>>
>>>>> [  174.540313] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/1327/0x00000002
>>>>> [  174.547353] Modules linked in: omapdrm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks bnep bluetooth ecdh_generic usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs ipv6 arc4 wl18xx wlcore mac80211 panel_boe_w677l snd_soc_omap_hdmi_audio snd_soc_dmic cfg80211 dwc3 snd_soc_omap_abe_twl6040 snd_soc_twl6040 leds_gpio wwan_on_off connector_hdmi omapdss encoder_tpd12s015 cec pwm_omap_dmtimer omapdss_base pwm_bl generic_adc_battery ehci_omap wlcore_sdio dwc3_omap bmp280_spi snd_soc_ts3a227e crtouch_mt leds_is31fl319x tsc2007 bq2429x_charger bq27xxx_battery_i2c bq27xxx_battery ina2xx as5013 tca8418_keypad twl6040_vibra palmas_pwrbutton gpio_twl6040 palmas_gpadc usb3503 bmp280_i2c bmc150_accel_i2c w2cbw003_bluetooth bmc150_magn_i2c bmp280 bmc150_accel_core
>>>>> [  174.624601]  bmc150_magn bno055 industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf industrialio snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine [last unloaded: syscopyarea]
>>>>> [  174.642327] CPU: 0 PID: 1327 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G        W         4.17.0-letux+ #2408
>>>>> [  174.651541] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>>> [  174.658004] Workqueue: events_power_efficient palmas_gpio_id_detect
>>>>> [  174.664780] [<c01106ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c058>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>>>>> [  174.673109] [<c010c058>] (show_stack) from [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
>>>>> [  174.680881] [<c074ba68>] (dump_stack) from [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug+0x60/0x84)
>>>>> [  174.689006] [<c0154050>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule+0x50/0x694)
>>>>> [  174.697217] [<c075e3c0>] (__schedule) from [<c075eab4>] (schedule+0xb0/0xcc)
>>>>> [  174.704790] [<c075eab4>] (schedule) from [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout+0x354/0x3d4)
>>>>> [  174.713100] [<c0761e58>] (schedule_timeout) from [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common+0x118/0x158)
>>>>> [  174.722064] [<c075f544>] (wait_for_common) from [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer+0x354/0x48c)
>>>>> [  174.730749] [<c05de908>] (omap_i2c_xfer) from [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer+0x238/0x550)
>>>>> [  174.739350] [<c05d8410>] (__i2c_transfer) from [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer+0x84/0xb4)
>>>>> [  174.747685] [<c05d87ac>] (i2c_transfer) from [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8+0x54/0x64 [bq2429x_charger])
>>>>> [  174.759465] [<bf15b1f0>] (bq24296_i2c_reg8_read.constprop.8 [bq2429x_charger]) from [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg+0x28/0xf8 [bq2429x_charger])
>>>>> [  174.773437] [<bf15b8f4>] (bq24296_update_reg [bq2429x_charger]) from [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable+0x100/0x238)
>>>>> [  174.784804] [<c0493b2c>] (_regulator_do_disable) from [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable+0x88/0x120)
>>>>> [  174.794404] [<c0493cec>] (_regulator_disable) from [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable+0x30/0x60)
>>>>> [  174.803556] [<c0493db4>] (regulator_disable) from [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox+0x84/0xf8 [dwc3_omap])
>>>>> [  174.814124] [<bf1950c8>] (dwc3_omap_set_mailbox [dwc3_omap]) from [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier+0x14/0x1c [dwc3_omap])
>>>>> [  174.826149] [<bf195198>] (dwc3_omap_id_notifier [dwc3_omap]) from [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68)
>>>>> [  174.836867] [<c014e458>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c)
>>>>> [  174.846661] [<c014e4a0>] (raw_notifier_call_chain) from [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync+0x54/0x19c)
>>>>> [  174.855804] [<c063bda4>] (extcon_sync) from [<c014874c>] (process_one_work+0x244/0x464)
>>>>> [  174.864386] [<c014874c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread+0x2c0/0x3ec)
>>>>> [  174.873156] [<c0148f20>] (worker_thread) from [<c014cef4>] (kthread+0x134/0x150)
>>>>> [  174.881087] [<c014cef4>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
>>>>>
>>>>> It turns out that extcon_sync() holds a spinlock while sending its notifiers and this
>>>>> is ending up in our regulator.en/disable() which wants to use blocking i2c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you see similar things on the OMAP5EVM when using OTG mode?
>>>>> The Palmas SMPS10 is also handled through i2c. Or is this magically hidden by regmap?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, as a workaround, I can make the regulator.en/disable() in the bq2429x driver
>>>>> just trigger a worker, but IMHO it is not expected for regulator ops to be spinlock safe.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I think extcon should not spinlock (which might be against the extcon design) or
>>>>
>>>> I think this something that should be addressed in the Extcon layer.
>>>> Do you really need to call the raw_notifier_call_chain() function with spinlock held in extcon_sync()?
>>>> if yes why?
>>>
>>> To reduce the latency of notification is important of extcon.
>>>
>>> So, extcon used the spinlock before calling the notifier_call_chain
>>> to prevent the scheduled out for a moment. Also, the notifier_call
>>> calls the registered notifier function sequentially. It means that
>>> if some registered notifier function spends a lot of time,
>>> the next registered notifier might receive the notification
>>> with a delay. So, extcon used the spinlock. Unitl now, 
>>>
>>> But, as you commented and previously, sometimes it caused the similar issues.
>>> (To fix similar issues, the consumer device used the workqueue)
>>>
>>> I will call notifier function without spinlock as following
>>> and I'll consider the other way to notify the changed state to consumer device
>>> with broadcasting way.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> index 8bff5fd18185..1e35b8ca3951 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
>>> @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>>>                return index;
>>>
>>>        spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
>>> -
>>>        state = !!(edev->state & BIT(index));
>>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&edev->lock, flags);
>>>
>>>        /*
>>>         * Call functions in a raw notifier chain for the specific one
>>> @@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ int extcon_sync(struct extcon_dev *edev, unsigned int id)
>>>         */
>>>        raw_notifier_call_chain(&edev->nh_all, state, edev);
>>>
>>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&edev->lock, flags);
>>> +
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Chanwoo.
>>
>> Nikolaus, could you please test this patch and give your Reported-by/Tested-by sign off? Thanks.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2
> 
> I have tested on the Pyra handheld prototype and now it works. Plugging in an OTG cable
> enables/disables OTG power as expected and there are no kernel oops any more.
> 
> So you can add my Reported-by/Tested-by.

Thanks for the test. But, you have to reply your reported/tested-by tag 
to patch[1] because all tags should be remained on lkml.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: Bug with dwc3 id detect and regulators

[H. Nikolaus Schaller]

Hi Chanwoo,

> Am 14.06.2018 um 12:03 schrieb Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>:
> 
> Hi Nikolaus,
>> 
>> So you can add my Reported-by/Tested-by.
> 
> Thanks for the test. But, you have to reply your reported/tested-by tag 
> to patch[1] because all tags should be remained on lkml.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/2

Well, I can't reply to that mail because I hadn't received it (yet?).

Maybe it works if you forward a copy to me.

BR, Nikolaus