All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: LinuxArm <linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	iommu
	<iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
	Libin <huawei.libin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:02:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B99C523.7060704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0775377-206f-ae3e-051d-3b829b499471-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>



On 2018/9/13 1:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 12/09/18 17:57, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:28:25AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> 1. change the type of global variable and struct member named "non_strict" from
>>>     "int" to "bool".
>>> 2. cancel the unnecessary parameter "strict" of __arm_lpae_unmap which was added
>>>     in v4.
>>> 3. change boot option "arm_iommu" to "iommu.non_strict".
>>> 4. convert __iommu_dma_unmap to use iommu_unmap_fast()/iommu_tlb_sync(), because
>>>     non-leaf unmaps still need to be synchronous.
>>>
>>> Thanks for Robin's review comments.
>>
>> Since this is 90% of the way there now, I suggest Robin picks up what's here
>> and incorporates his remaining review comments directly (especially since it
>> sounded like Zhen Lei hasn't got much free time lately). With that, I can
>> queue this lot via my smmu branch, which already has some stuff queued
>> for SMMUv3 and io-pgtable.
>>
>> Please shout if you have any objections, but I'm keen for this not to
>> languish on the lists given how close it is!
> 
> Sure, having got this far I'd like to see it get done too. I'll make some time and give it a go.

Thank you very much.

I've been too busy lately, at least I still have no time this week, I also think it's been too long.

So sorry and thanks again.

> 
> Robin.
> 
> .
> 

-- 
Thanks!
BestRegards

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (Leizhen (ThunderTown))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:02:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B99C523.7060704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0775377-206f-ae3e-051d-3b829b499471@arm.com>



On 2018/9/13 1:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 12/09/18 17:57, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:28:25AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> 1. change the type of global variable and struct member named "non_strict" from
>>>     "int" to "bool".
>>> 2. cancel the unnecessary parameter "strict" of __arm_lpae_unmap which was added
>>>     in v4.
>>> 3. change boot option "arm_iommu" to "iommu.non_strict".
>>> 4. convert __iommu_dma_unmap to use iommu_unmap_fast()/iommu_tlb_sync(), because
>>>     non-leaf unmaps still need to be synchronous.
>>>
>>> Thanks for Robin's review comments.
>>
>> Since this is 90% of the way there now, I suggest Robin picks up what's here
>> and incorporates his remaining review comments directly (especially since it
>> sounded like Zhen Lei hasn't got much free time lately). With that, I can
>> queue this lot via my smmu branch, which already has some stuff queued
>> for SMMUv3 and io-pgtable.
>>
>> Please shout if you have any objections, but I'm keen for this not to
>> languish on the lists given how close it is!
> 
> Sure, having got this far I'd like to see it get done too. I'll make some time and give it a go.

Thank you very much.

I've been too busy lately, at least I still have no time this week, I also think it's been too long.

So sorry and thanks again.

> 
> Robin.
> 
> .
> 

-- 
Thanks!
BestRegards

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LinuxArm <linuxarm@huawei.com>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:02:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B99C523.7060704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0775377-206f-ae3e-051d-3b829b499471@arm.com>



On 2018/9/13 1:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 12/09/18 17:57, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:28:25AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> 1. change the type of global variable and struct member named "non_strict" from
>>>     "int" to "bool".
>>> 2. cancel the unnecessary parameter "strict" of __arm_lpae_unmap which was added
>>>     in v4.
>>> 3. change boot option "arm_iommu" to "iommu.non_strict".
>>> 4. convert __iommu_dma_unmap to use iommu_unmap_fast()/iommu_tlb_sync(), because
>>>     non-leaf unmaps still need to be synchronous.
>>>
>>> Thanks for Robin's review comments.
>>
>> Since this is 90% of the way there now, I suggest Robin picks up what's here
>> and incorporates his remaining review comments directly (especially since it
>> sounded like Zhen Lei hasn't got much free time lately). With that, I can
>> queue this lot via my smmu branch, which already has some stuff queued
>> for SMMUv3 and io-pgtable.
>>
>> Please shout if you have any objections, but I'm keen for this not to
>> languish on the lists given how close it is!
> 
> Sure, having got this far I'd like to see it get done too. I'll make some time and give it a go.

Thank you very much.

I've been too busy lately, at least I still have no time this week, I also think it's been too long.

So sorry and thanks again.

> 
> Robin.
> 
> .
> 

-- 
Thanks!
BestRegards


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-13  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-15  1:28 [PATCH v5 0/5] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3 Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28 ` Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: fix the implementation of flush_iotlb_all hook Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28   ` Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iommu/dma: add support for non-strict mode Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28   ` Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: " Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28   ` Zhen Lei
2018-08-22 17:52   ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-22 17:52     ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-27  8:21     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-08-27  8:21       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-08-15  1:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: " Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28   ` Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add bootup option "iommu.non_strict" Zhen Lei
2018-08-15  1:28   ` Zhen Lei
2018-08-22 17:02   ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-22 17:02     ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-27  7:05     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-08-27  7:05       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-09-12 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] add non-strict mode support for arm-smmu-v3 Will Deacon
2018-09-12 16:57   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-12 17:12   ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-12 17:12     ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]     ` <d0775377-206f-ae3e-051d-3b829b499471-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-13  2:02       ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
2018-09-13  2:02         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-09-13  2:02         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5B99C523.7060704@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=guohanjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=huawei.libin-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.