From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: lijun_nudt@163.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
xavier_huwei@163.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 rdma-next 2/3] RDMA/hns: Fix the chip hanging caused by sending mailbox&CMQ during reset
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 11:27:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5C4BD3BD.2080601@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C4BBC3E.2000004@huawei.com>
On 2019/1/26 9:47, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>
> On 2019/1/26 5:50, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:15:40AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>> On 2019/1/25 2:31, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>>>> On 2019/1/24 6:40, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:36:06AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static int hns_roce_v2_cmd_hw_resetting(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>>>>>>> + unsigned long instance_stage,
>>>>>>> + unsigned long reset_stage)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct hns_roce_v2_priv *priv = (struct hns_roce_v2_priv *)hr_dev->priv;
>>>>>>> + struct hnae3_handle *handle = priv->handle;
>>>>>>> + const struct hnae3_ae_ops *ops = handle->ae_algo->ops;
>>>>>>> + unsigned long end;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + /* When hardware reset is detected, we should stop sending mailbox&cmq
>>>>>>> + * to hardware, and wait until hardware reset finished. If now
>>>>>>> + * in .init_instance() function, we should exit with error. If now at
>>>>>>> + * HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT stage of soft reset process, we should exit with
>>>>>>> + * error, and then HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT related process can rollback the
>>>>>>> + * operation like notifing hardware to free resources, HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT
>>>>>>> + * related process will exit with error to notify NIC driver to
>>>>>>> + * reschedule soft reset process once again.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + end = msecs_to_jiffies(HNS_ROCE_V2_HW_RST_TIMEOUT) + jiffies;
>>>>>>> + while (ops->get_hw_reset_stat(handle) && time_before(jiffies, end))
>>>>>>> + udelay(1);
>>>>>> I thought you were getting rid of these loops?
>>>>> Hi, Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> Upper applications maybe notify driver to issue mailbox or CMD
>>>>> commands to hardware, some commands used to cancel resources,
>>>>> destory bt/destory cq/unreg mr/destory qp etc. when such
>>>>> commands are executed successfully, the hardware engine will
>>>>> no longer access some memory registered by the driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> When reset occurs, it is possible for upper applications notify driver
>>>>> to issue mailbox or CMD commands, we need to wait until hardware
>>>>> reset finished to ensure that hardware no longer accesses related
>>>>> memory.
>>>> You should not wait for things using loops like the above.
>>> Hi, Jason
>>>
>>> Are your comments foucsing on udelay? If not, thanks for your detail
>>> information.
>>> In hns3 RoCE driver, some CMQ/mailbox operation are called inside
>>> the lock,
>>> we can't use msleep in the lock, otherwise it will cause deadlock.
>>> When reset occurs, RDMA service cannot be provided normally, I think
>>> in this
>>> case using udelay will not have a great impact.
>> You should not use any kind of sleep call in a loop like this.
> Hi, Jason
>
> OK, I got your opinion and will modify it in v3 patch as below:
>
> end = msecs_to_jiffies(HNS_ROCE_V2_HW_RST_TIMEOUT) + jiffies;
> while (time_before(jiffies, end))
> if (!ops->get_hw_reset_stat(handle))
> break;
>
Hi, Jason
Thanks for your comments, I have modified them and send patch V3.
Thanks.
Regards
Xavier
> Regards
> Xavier
>> Jason
>>
>> .
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxarm mailing list
> Linuxarm@huawei.com
> http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
>
> .
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: <lijun_nudt@163.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<xavier_huwei@163.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dledford@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 rdma-next 2/3] RDMA/hns: Fix the chip hanging caused by sending mailbox&CMQ during reset
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 11:27:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5C4BD3BD.2080601@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C4BBC3E.2000004@huawei.com>
On 2019/1/26 9:47, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>
> On 2019/1/26 5:50, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:15:40AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>> On 2019/1/25 2:31, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>>>> On 2019/1/24 6:40, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:36:06AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static int hns_roce_v2_cmd_hw_resetting(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>>>>>>> + unsigned long instance_stage,
>>>>>>> + unsigned long reset_stage)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct hns_roce_v2_priv *priv = (struct hns_roce_v2_priv *)hr_dev->priv;
>>>>>>> + struct hnae3_handle *handle = priv->handle;
>>>>>>> + const struct hnae3_ae_ops *ops = handle->ae_algo->ops;
>>>>>>> + unsigned long end;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + /* When hardware reset is detected, we should stop sending mailbox&cmq
>>>>>>> + * to hardware, and wait until hardware reset finished. If now
>>>>>>> + * in .init_instance() function, we should exit with error. If now at
>>>>>>> + * HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT stage of soft reset process, we should exit with
>>>>>>> + * error, and then HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT related process can rollback the
>>>>>>> + * operation like notifing hardware to free resources, HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT
>>>>>>> + * related process will exit with error to notify NIC driver to
>>>>>>> + * reschedule soft reset process once again.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + end = msecs_to_jiffies(HNS_ROCE_V2_HW_RST_TIMEOUT) + jiffies;
>>>>>>> + while (ops->get_hw_reset_stat(handle) && time_before(jiffies, end))
>>>>>>> + udelay(1);
>>>>>> I thought you were getting rid of these loops?
>>>>> Hi, Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> Upper applications maybe notify driver to issue mailbox or CMD
>>>>> commands to hardware, some commands used to cancel resources,
>>>>> destory bt/destory cq/unreg mr/destory qp etc. when such
>>>>> commands are executed successfully, the hardware engine will
>>>>> no longer access some memory registered by the driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> When reset occurs, it is possible for upper applications notify driver
>>>>> to issue mailbox or CMD commands, we need to wait until hardware
>>>>> reset finished to ensure that hardware no longer accesses related
>>>>> memory.
>>>> You should not wait for things using loops like the above.
>>> Hi, Jason
>>>
>>> Are your comments foucsing on udelay? If not, thanks for your detail
>>> information.
>>> In hns3 RoCE driver, some CMQ/mailbox operation are called inside
>>> the lock,
>>> we can't use msleep in the lock, otherwise it will cause deadlock.
>>> When reset occurs, RDMA service cannot be provided normally, I think
>>> in this
>>> case using udelay will not have a great impact.
>> You should not use any kind of sleep call in a loop like this.
> Hi, Jason
>
> OK, I got your opinion and will modify it in v3 patch as below:
>
> end = msecs_to_jiffies(HNS_ROCE_V2_HW_RST_TIMEOUT) + jiffies;
> while (time_before(jiffies, end))
> if (!ops->get_hw_reset_stat(handle))
> break;
>
Hi, Jason
Thanks for your comments, I have modified them and send patch V3.
Thanks.
Regards
Xavier
> Regards
> Xavier
>> Jason
>>
>> .
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxarm mailing list
> Linuxarm@huawei.com
> http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-26 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-19 3:36 [PATCH V2 rdma-next 0/3] RDMA/hns: Some fixes for hns RoCE driver Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` [PATCH V2 rdma-next 1/3] RDMA/hns: Fix the Oops during rmmod or insmod ko when reset occurs Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` [PATCH V2 rdma-next 2/3] RDMA/hns: Fix the chip hanging caused by sending mailbox&CMQ during reset Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-23 22:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-24 3:13 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-24 3:13 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-24 18:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-25 2:15 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-25 2:15 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-25 21:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-26 1:47 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-26 1:47 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-26 3:27 ` Wei Hu (Xavier) [this message]
2019-01-26 3:27 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-28 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-01-29 2:18 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-29 2:18 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-29 3:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-02-03 12:46 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-02-03 12:46 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` [PATCH V2 rdma-next 3/3] RDMA/hns: Fix the chip hanging caused by sending doorbell " Wei Hu (Xavier)
2019-01-19 3:36 ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5C4BD3BD.2080601@huawei.com \
--to=xavier.huwei@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=lijun_nudt@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=xavier_huwei@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.