* [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
@ 2019-03-04 9:44 Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-05 20:38 ` Bart Van Assche
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2019-03-04 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
index 5831e0eecea1..c726c029affe 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ static void tcmu_dev_kref_release(struct kref *kref)
WARN_ON(!all_expired);
tcmu_blocks_release(&udev->data_blocks, 0, udev->dbi_max + 1);
- kfree(udev->data_bitmap);
+ bitmap_free(udev->data_bitmap);
mutex_unlock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
call_rcu(&dev->rcu_head, tcmu_dev_call_rcu);
@@ -1870,9 +1870,7 @@ static int tcmu_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
info = &udev->uio_info;
mutex_lock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
- udev->data_bitmap = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(udev->max_blocks),
- sizeof(unsigned long),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ udev->data_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(udev->max_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
mutex_unlock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
if (!udev->data_bitmap) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1959,7 +1957,7 @@ static int tcmu_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
vfree(udev->mb_addr);
udev->mb_addr = NULL;
err_vzalloc:
- kfree(udev->data_bitmap);
+ bitmap_free(udev->data_bitmap);
udev->data_bitmap = NULL;
err_bitmap_alloc:
kfree(info->name);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
2019-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc() Andy Shevchenko
@ 2019-03-05 20:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-06 17:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2019-03-05 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 11:44 +-0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
+AD4 Switch to bitmap+AF8-zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
+AD4 Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void +ACo.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche +ADw-bvanassche+AEA-acm.org+AD4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
2019-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc() Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-05 20:38 ` Bart Van Assche
@ 2019-03-06 17:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-03-06 20:43 ` Mike Christie
2019-03-07 0:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2019-03-06 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
Mike,
Please review!
> Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
> index 5831e0eecea1..c726c029affe 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
> @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ static void tcmu_dev_kref_release(struct kref *kref)
> WARN_ON(!all_expired);
>
> tcmu_blocks_release(&udev->data_blocks, 0, udev->dbi_max + 1);
> - kfree(udev->data_bitmap);
> + bitmap_free(udev->data_bitmap);
> mutex_unlock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
>
> call_rcu(&dev->rcu_head, tcmu_dev_call_rcu);
> @@ -1870,9 +1870,7 @@ static int tcmu_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
> info = &udev->uio_info;
>
> mutex_lock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
> - udev->data_bitmap = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(udev->max_blocks),
> - sizeof(unsigned long),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + udev->data_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(udev->max_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> mutex_unlock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
> if (!udev->data_bitmap) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1959,7 +1957,7 @@ static int tcmu_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
> vfree(udev->mb_addr);
> udev->mb_addr = NULL;
> err_vzalloc:
> - kfree(udev->data_bitmap);
> + bitmap_free(udev->data_bitmap);
> udev->data_bitmap = NULL;
> err_bitmap_alloc:
> kfree(info->name);
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
2019-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc() Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-05 20:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-06 17:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2019-03-06 20:43 ` Mike Christie
2019-03-07 0:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2019-03-06 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
On 03/04/2019 03:44 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
> index 5831e0eecea1..c726c029affe 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_user.c
> @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ static void tcmu_dev_kref_release(struct kref *kref)
> WARN_ON(!all_expired);
>
> tcmu_blocks_release(&udev->data_blocks, 0, udev->dbi_max + 1);
> - kfree(udev->data_bitmap);
> + bitmap_free(udev->data_bitmap);
> mutex_unlock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
>
> call_rcu(&dev->rcu_head, tcmu_dev_call_rcu);
> @@ -1870,9 +1870,7 @@ static int tcmu_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
> info = &udev->uio_info;
>
> mutex_lock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
> - udev->data_bitmap = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(udev->max_blocks),
> - sizeof(unsigned long),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + udev->data_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(udev->max_blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> mutex_unlock(&udev->cmdr_lock);
> if (!udev->data_bitmap) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1959,7 +1957,7 @@ static int tcmu_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
> vfree(udev->mb_addr);
> udev->mb_addr = NULL;
> err_vzalloc:
> - kfree(udev->data_bitmap);
> + bitmap_free(udev->data_bitmap);
> udev->data_bitmap = NULL;
> err_bitmap_alloc:
> kfree(info->name);
>
Looks nice to me. Thanks.
Acked-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
2019-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc() Andy Shevchenko
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-03-06 20:43 ` Mike Christie
@ 2019-03-07 0:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2019-03-07 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
Andy,
> Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void
> *.
Applied to 5.1/scsi-queue. Thank you!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-07 0:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v1] scsi: tcmu: Switch to bitmap_zalloc() Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-05 20:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-03-06 17:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-03-06 20:43 ` Mike Christie
2019-03-07 0:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.