* OE-Core status with gcc9 @ 2019-05-12 13:21 Richard Purdie 2019-05-12 17:14 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2019-05-12 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue with gcc 9: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: OE-Core status with gcc9 2019-05-12 13:21 OE-Core status with gcc9 Richard Purdie @ 2019-05-12 17:14 ` Khem Raj 2019-05-14 3:39 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2019-05-12 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > with gcc 9: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). I wonder if its a common case or specific here? I will try to reproduce it as well > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > Cheers, > > Richard > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: OE-Core status with gcc9 2019-05-12 17:14 ` Khem Raj @ 2019-05-14 3:39 ` Khem Raj 2019-05-26 17:17 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2019-05-14 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > with gcc 9: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > I will try to reproduce it as well > I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can provide the asm file which crashes assembler > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: OE-Core status with gcc9 2019-05-14 3:39 ` Khem Raj @ 2019-05-26 17:17 ` Khem Raj 2019-05-27 7:53 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2019-05-26 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > > with gcc 9: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > > I will try to reproduce it as well > > > > I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on > qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler > so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try > it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access > to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can > provide the asm file which crashes assembler > got some more time to narrow it down. works with musl+gcc-9 works with glibc+clang-8 works with musl+Clang-8 so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue > > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Richard > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: OE-Core status with gcc9 2019-05-26 17:17 ` Khem Raj @ 2019-05-27 7:53 ` Khem Raj 2019-06-06 8:16 ` Yu, Mingli 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2019-05-27 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > > > with gcc 9: > > > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > > > > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > > > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > > > > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > > > I will try to reproduce it as well > > > > > > > I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on > > qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler > > so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try > > it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access > > to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can > > provide the asm file which crashes assembler > > > got some more time to narrow it down. > works with musl+gcc-9 > works with glibc+clang-8 > works with musl+Clang-8 > > so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue > I have sent a workaound for this which we can try out. https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/161674/ > > > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: OE-Core status with gcc9 2019-05-27 7:53 ` Khem Raj @ 2019-06-06 8:16 ` Yu, Mingli 2019-06-06 12:55 ` nick83ola 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Yu, Mingli @ 2019-06-06 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj, Richard Purdie; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 2019年05月27日 15:53, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie >>>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue >>>>> with gcc 9: >>>>> >>>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 >>>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating >>>> >>>> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o >>>> /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: >>>> /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). >>>> >>>> I wonder if its a common case or specific here? >>>> I will try to reproduce it as well >>>> >>> >>> I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on >>> qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler >>> so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try >>> it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access >>> to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can >>> provide the asm file which crashes assembler >>> >> got some more time to narrow it down. >> works with musl+gcc-9 >> works with glibc+clang-8 >> works with musl+Clang-8 >> >> so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue >> > > I have sent a workaound for this which we can try out. > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/161674/ Failed to build llvm with gcc9 for qemuppc as below: | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped Thanks, > >>>>> which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and >>>>> hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed >>>>> we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. >>>>> >>>>> I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Richard >>>>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: OE-Core status with gcc9 2019-06-06 8:16 ` Yu, Mingli @ 2019-06-06 12:55 ` nick83ola 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: nick83ola @ 2019-06-06 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yu, Mingli; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Probably is not an issue for ie-core but gcc-9 is also breaking all the openjdk8 build on meta-java Can this be postponed a bit? Thanks Nicola Lunghi On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Yu, Mingli <mingli.yu@windriver.com> wrote: > > > > On 2019年05月27日 15:53, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > >>>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > >>>>> with gcc 9: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > >>>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > >>>> > >>>> HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > >>>> /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > >>>> /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > >>>> > >>>> I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > >>>> I will try to reproduce it as well > >>>> > >>> > >>> I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on > >>> qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler > >>> so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try > >>> it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access > >>> to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can > >>> provide the asm file which crashes assembler > >>> > >> got some more time to narrow it down. > >> works with musl+gcc-9 > >> works with glibc+clang-8 > >> works with musl+Clang-8 > >> > >> so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue > >> > > > > I have sent a workaound for this which we can try out. > > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/161674/ > > Failed to build llvm with gcc9 for qemuppc as below: > | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation > fault], core dumped > > Thanks, > > > > >>>>> which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > >>>>> hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > >>>>> we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> > >>>>> Richard > >>>>> > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-06 12:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-05-12 13:21 OE-Core status with gcc9 Richard Purdie 2019-05-12 17:14 ` Khem Raj 2019-05-14 3:39 ` Khem Raj 2019-05-26 17:17 ` Khem Raj 2019-05-27 7:53 ` Khem Raj 2019-06-06 8:16 ` Yu, Mingli 2019-06-06 12:55 ` nick83ola
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.