From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] can: kvaser_pciefd: remove redundant negative check on trigger
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:37:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D39A274.1000800@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725112509.1075-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 25.07.2019 13:25, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check to see if trigger is less than zero is always false, trigger
> is always in the range 0..255. Hence the check is redundant and can
> be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
> index 3af747cbbde4..68e00aad0810 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
> @@ -652,9 +652,6 @@ static void kvaser_pciefd_pwm_stop(struct kvaser_pciefd_can *can)
> top = (pwm_ctrl >> KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_TOP_SHIFT) & 0xff;
>
> trigger = (100 * top + 50) / 100;
> - if (trigger < 0)
> - trigger = 0;
> -
to be fair i do not understand the calculation here here.
(100*top+50)/100 = top+50/100
but seems to be int so it should be =top
did i missunderstand something here ?
re,
wh
> pwm_ctrl = trigger & 0xff;
> pwm_ctrl |= (top & 0xff) << KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_TOP_SHIFT;
> iowrite32(pwm_ctrl, can->reg_base + KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_REG);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] can: kvaser_pciefd: remove redundant negative check on trigger
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:37:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D39A274.1000800@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725112509.1075-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 25.07.2019 13:25, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check to see if trigger is less than zero is always false, trigger
> is always in the range 0..255. Hence the check is redundant and can
> be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
> index 3af747cbbde4..68e00aad0810 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
> @@ -652,9 +652,6 @@ static void kvaser_pciefd_pwm_stop(struct kvaser_pciefd_can *can)
> top = (pwm_ctrl >> KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_TOP_SHIFT) & 0xff;
>
> trigger = (100 * top + 50) / 100;
> - if (trigger < 0)
> - trigger = 0;
> -
to be fair i do not understand the calculation here here.
(100*top+50)/100 = top+50/100
but seems to be int so it should be =top
did i missunderstand something here ?
re,
wh
> pwm_ctrl = trigger & 0xff;
> pwm_ctrl |= (top & 0xff) << KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_TOP_SHIFT;
> iowrite32(pwm_ctrl, can->reg_base + KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_REG);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 11:25 [PATCH][next] can: kvaser_pciefd: remove redundant negative check on trigger Colin King
2019-07-25 11:25 ` Colin King
2019-07-25 12:37 ` walter harms [this message]
2019-07-25 12:37 ` walter harms
2019-07-25 12:41 ` Colin Ian King
2019-07-25 12:41 ` Colin Ian King
2019-08-02 12:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-08-02 12:12 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-08-05 7:21 ` Christer Beskow
2019-08-06 6:43 ` Christer Beskow
2019-08-06 6:46 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5D39A274.1000800@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.