From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when applicable
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:06:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D42B98B.40900@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801074759.32738-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Am 01.08.2019 09:47, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> There is no need to use GFP_ATOMIC when calling 'usb_alloc_coherent()'
> here. These calls are done from probe functions and using GFP_KERNEL should
> be safe.
> The memory itself is used within some interrupts, but it is not a
> problem, once it has been allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
> index d5b7a696a68c..63e8ef8beb45 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
> @@ -239,11 +239,11 @@ static int usb_kbd_alloc_mem(struct usb_device *dev, struct usb_kbd *kbd)
> return -1;
> if (!(kbd->led = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL)))
> return -1;
> - if (!(kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->new_dma)))
> + if (!(kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &kbd->new_dma)))
> return -1;
> if (!(kbd->cr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest), GFP_KERNEL)))
> return -1;
> - if (!(kbd->leds = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->leds_dma)))
> + if (!(kbd->leds = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 1, GFP_KERNEL, &kbd->leds_dma)))
> return -1;
>
the kernel style is usually:
kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->new_dma);
if (!kbd->new)
return -1;
in usbmouse.c this is done, any reason for the change here ?
re,
wh
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> index 073127e65ac1..c89332017d5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int usb_mouse_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_i
> if (!mouse || !input_dev)
> goto fail1;
>
> - mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &mouse->data_dma);
> + mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &mouse->data_dma);
> if (!mouse->data)
> goto fail1;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: jikos@kernel.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when applicable
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 12:06:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D42B98B.40900@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801074759.32738-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Am 01.08.2019 09:47, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> There is no need to use GFP_ATOMIC when calling 'usb_alloc_coherent()'
> here. These calls are done from probe functions and using GFP_KERNEL should
> be safe.
> The memory itself is used within some interrupts, but it is not a
> problem, once it has been allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
> index d5b7a696a68c..63e8ef8beb45 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
> @@ -239,11 +239,11 @@ static int usb_kbd_alloc_mem(struct usb_device *dev, struct usb_kbd *kbd)
> return -1;
> if (!(kbd->led = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL)))
> return -1;
> - if (!(kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->new_dma)))
> + if (!(kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &kbd->new_dma)))
> return -1;
> if (!(kbd->cr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest), GFP_KERNEL)))
> return -1;
> - if (!(kbd->leds = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->leds_dma)))
> + if (!(kbd->leds = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 1, GFP_KERNEL, &kbd->leds_dma)))
> return -1;
>
the kernel style is usually:
kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->new_dma);
if (!kbd->new)
return -1;
in usbmouse.c this is done, any reason for the change here ?
re,
wh
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> index 073127e65ac1..c89332017d5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int usb_mouse_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_i
> if (!mouse || !input_dev)
> goto fail1;
>
> - mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &mouse->data_dma);
> + mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &mouse->data_dma);
> if (!mouse->data)
> goto fail1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 7:47 [PATCH] HID: usbhid: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when applicable Christophe JAILLET
2019-08-01 7:47 ` Christophe JAILLET
2019-08-01 10:06 ` walter harms [this message]
2019-08-01 10:06 ` walter harms
2019-08-01 13:47 ` Greg KH
2019-08-01 13:47 ` Greg KH
2019-08-02 7:51 ` Christophe JAILLET
2019-08-02 7:51 ` Christophe JAILLET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5D42B98B.40900@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.