* [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 0/2] virtiofsd: Improve io bandwidth by replacing pwrite with pwritev
@ 2019-08-15 0:54 piaojun
2019-08-15 0:57 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 1/2] virtiofsd: add definition of fuse_buf_writev() piaojun
2019-08-15 0:59 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 2/2] virtiofsd: use fuse_buf_writev to replace fuse_buf_write for better performance piaojun
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: piaojun @ 2019-08-15 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-fs
>From my test, write bandwidth will be improved greatly by replacing
pwrite with pwritev, and the test result as below:
---
pwrite:
# fio -direct=1 -time_based -iodepth=64 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=1M -size=1G -numjob=16 -runtime=30 -group_reporting -name=file -filename=/mnt/virtiofs/file
file: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=1M-1M/1M-1M/1M-1M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
...
fio-2.13
Starting 16 processes
Jobs: 16 (f=16): [w(16)] [100.0% done] [0KB/886.0MB/0KB /s] [0/886/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
file: (groupid=0, jobs=16): err= 0: pid=5799: Tue Aug 6 18:48:26 2019
write: io=26881MB, bw=916988KB/s, iops=895, runt= 30018msec
pwritev:
# fio -direct=1 -time_based -iodepth=64 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=1M -size=1G -numjob=16 -runtime=30 -group_reporting -name=file -filename=/mnt/virtiofs/file
file: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=1M-1M/1M-1M/1M-1M, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
...
fio-2.13
Starting 16 processes
Jobs: 16 (f=16): [w(16)] [100.0% done] [0KB/1793MB/0KB /s] [0/1793/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
file: (groupid=0, jobs=16): err= 0: pid=6328: Tue Aug 6 18:22:17 2019
write: io=52775MB, bw=1758.7MB/s, iops=1758, runt= 30009msec
---
This patch introduces writev and pwritev for lo_write_buf().
v2
- Split into two patches
- Add the lost flags support, such as FUSE_BUF_PHYS_ADDR
v3
- use git send-email to make the patch set in one thread
- move fuse_buf_writev() into fuse_buf_copy()
- use writev for the src buffers when they're alread already mapped by the daemon process
- use calloc to replace malloc
- set res 0 if writev() returns 0
v4
- iterate from in_buf->buf[0] rather than buf[1]
- optimize the code to make it more elegant
v5
- add some check for preconditions of the buffers
Jun Piao (2):
add definition of fuse_buf_writev().
use fuse_buf_writev to replace fuse_buf_write for better performance
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
---
buffer.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
seccomp.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 1/2] virtiofsd: add definition of fuse_buf_writev()
2019-08-15 0:54 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 0/2] virtiofsd: Improve io bandwidth by replacing pwrite with pwritev piaojun
@ 2019-08-15 0:57 ` piaojun
2019-08-15 0:59 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 2/2] virtiofsd: use fuse_buf_writev to replace fuse_buf_write for better performance piaojun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: piaojun @ 2019-08-15 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-fs
Define fuse_buf_writev() which use pwritev and writev to improve io
bandwidth.
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
contrib/virtiofsd/seccomp.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c
index 655be137..cec762f 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
size_t fuse_buf_size(const struct fuse_bufvec *bufv)
{
@@ -71,6 +72,36 @@ static ssize_t fuse_buf_write(const struct fuse_buf *dst, size_t dst_off,
return copied;
}
+static ssize_t fuse_buf_writev(fuse_req_t req,
+ struct fuse_buf *out_buf,
+ struct fuse_bufvec *in_buf)
+{
+ ssize_t res, i;
+ size_t iovcnt = in_buf->count;
+ struct iovec * iov;
+ int fd = out_buf->fd;
+
+ iov = calloc(iovcnt, sizeof(struct iovec));
+ if (!iov)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < iovcnt; i++) {
+ iov[i].iov_base = in_buf->buf[i].mem;
+ iov[i].iov_len = in_buf->buf[i].size;
+ }
+
+ if (out_buf->flags & FUSE_BUF_FD_SEEK)
+ res = pwritev(fd, iov, iovcnt, out_buf->pos);
+ else
+ res = writev(fd, iov, iovcnt);
+
+ if (res == -1)
+ res = -errno;
+
+ free(iov);
+ return res;
+}
+
static ssize_t fuse_buf_read(const struct fuse_buf *dst, size_t dst_off,
const struct fuse_buf *src, size_t src_off,
size_t len)
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/seccomp.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
index 5f1c873..4bba30b 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/seccomp.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
SCMP_SYS(ppoll),
SCMP_SYS(prctl), /* TODO restrict to just PR_SET_NAME? */
SCMP_SYS(preadv),
+ SCMP_SYS(pwritev),
SCMP_SYS(pwrite64),
SCMP_SYS(read),
SCMP_SYS(readlinkat),
@@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
SCMP_SYS(unlinkat),
SCMP_SYS(utimensat),
SCMP_SYS(write),
+ SCMP_SYS(writev),
};
/* Syscalls used when --syslog is enabled */
--
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 2/2] virtiofsd: use fuse_buf_writev to replace fuse_buf_write for better performance
2019-08-15 0:54 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 0/2] virtiofsd: Improve io bandwidth by replacing pwrite with pwritev piaojun
2019-08-15 0:57 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 1/2] virtiofsd: add definition of fuse_buf_writev() piaojun
@ 2019-08-15 0:59 ` piaojun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: piaojun @ 2019-08-15 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: virtio-fs
fuse_buf_writev() only handles the normal write in which src is buffer
and dest is fd. Specially if src buffer represents guest physical
address that can't be mapped by the daemon process, IO must be bounced
back to the VMM to do it by fuse_buf_copy().
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c
index cec762f..ee28367 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/buffer.c
@@ -318,11 +318,23 @@ static int fuse_bufvec_advance(struct fuse_bufvec *bufv, size_t len)
ssize_t fuse_buf_copy(fuse_req_t req, struct fuse_bufvec *dstv, struct fuse_bufvec *srcv,
enum fuse_buf_copy_flags flags)
{
+ size_t i;
size_t copied = 0;
if (dstv == srcv)
return fuse_buf_size(dstv);
+ /* use writev to improve bandwidth when all the
+ * src buffers already mapped by the daemon
+ * process */
+ for (i = 0; i < srcv->count; i++) {
+ if ((srcv->buf[i].flags & FUSE_BUF_PHYS_ADDR) ||
+ (srcv->buf[i].flags & FUSE_BUF_IS_FD))
+ break;
+ }
+ if ((i == srcv->count) && (dstv->buf[0].flags & FUSE_BUF_IS_FD))
+ return fuse_buf_writev(req, &dstv->buf[0], srcv);
+
for (;;) {
const struct fuse_buf *src = fuse_bufvec_current(srcv);
const struct fuse_buf *dst = fuse_bufvec_current(dstv);
--
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-15 0:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-15 0:54 [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 0/2] virtiofsd: Improve io bandwidth by replacing pwrite with pwritev piaojun
2019-08-15 0:57 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 1/2] virtiofsd: add definition of fuse_buf_writev() piaojun
2019-08-15 0:59 ` [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 2/2] virtiofsd: use fuse_buf_writev to replace fuse_buf_write for better performance piaojun
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.