From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, gustavo@embeddedor.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: fix page faults in do_alignment
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:49:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D69D239.2080908@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830133522.GZ13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On 2019/8/30 21:35, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 09:31:17PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
>> The function do_alignment can handle misaligned address for user and
>> kernel space. If it is a userspace access, do_alignment may fail on
>> a low-memory situation, because page faults are disabled in
>> probe_kernel_address.
>>
>> Fix this by using __copy_from_user stead of probe_kernel_address.
>>
>> Fixes: b255188 ("ARM: fix scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code")
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
>
> NAK.
>
> The "scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code" is
> caused by fixing up the page fault while trying to handle the
> mis-alignment fault generated from an instruction in atomic context.
__might_sleep is called in the function __get_user which lead to that bug.
And that bug is triggered in a kernel space. Page fault can not be generated.
Right?
> Your patch re-introduces that bug.
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
>> index 04b3643..2ccabd3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
>> @@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ static ssize_t alignment_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer
>> unsigned long instr = 0, instrptr;
>> int (*handler)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long instr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>> unsigned int type;
>> + mm_segment_t fs;
>> unsigned int fault;
>> u16 tinstr = 0;
>> int isize = 4;
>> @@ -784,16 +785,22 @@ static ssize_t alignment_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer
>>
>> instrptr = instruction_pointer(regs);
>>
>> + fs = get_fs();
>> + set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
>> if (thumb_mode(regs)) {
>> u16 *ptr = (u16 *)(instrptr & ~1);
>> - fault = probe_kernel_address(ptr, tinstr);
>> + fault = __copy_from_user(tinstr,
>> + (__force const void __user *)ptr,
>> + sizeof(tinstr));
>> tinstr = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(tinstr);
>> if (!fault) {
>> if (cpu_architecture() >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv7 &&
>> IS_T32(tinstr)) {
>> /* Thumb-2 32-bit */
>> u16 tinst2 = 0;
>> - fault = probe_kernel_address(ptr + 1, tinst2);
>> + fault = __copy_from_user(tinst2,
>> + (__force const void __user *)(ptr+1),
>> + sizeof(tinst2));
>> tinst2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(tinst2);
>> instr = __opcode_thumb32_compose(tinstr, tinst2);
>> thumb2_32b = 1;
>> @@ -803,10 +810,13 @@ static ssize_t alignment_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer
>> }
>> }
>> } else {
>> - fault = probe_kernel_address((void *)instrptr, instr);
>> + fault = __copy_from_user(instr,
>> + (__force const void __user *)instrptr,
>> + sizeof(instr));
>> instr = __mem_to_opcode_arm(instr);
>> }
>>
>> + set_fs(fs);
>> if (fault) {
>> type = TYPE_FAULT;
>> goto bad_or_fault;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: <ebiederm@xmission.com>, <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: fix page faults in do_alignment
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 09:49:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D69D239.2080908@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830133522.GZ13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On 2019/8/30 21:35, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 09:31:17PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
>> The function do_alignment can handle misaligned address for user and
>> kernel space. If it is a userspace access, do_alignment may fail on
>> a low-memory situation, because page faults are disabled in
>> probe_kernel_address.
>>
>> Fix this by using __copy_from_user stead of probe_kernel_address.
>>
>> Fixes: b255188 ("ARM: fix scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code")
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
>
> NAK.
>
> The "scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code" is
> caused by fixing up the page fault while trying to handle the
> mis-alignment fault generated from an instruction in atomic context.
__might_sleep is called in the function __get_user which lead to that bug.
And that bug is triggered in a kernel space. Page fault can not be generated.
Right?
> Your patch re-introduces that bug.
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
>> index 04b3643..2ccabd3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
>> @@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ static ssize_t alignment_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer
>> unsigned long instr = 0, instrptr;
>> int (*handler)(unsigned long addr, unsigned long instr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>> unsigned int type;
>> + mm_segment_t fs;
>> unsigned int fault;
>> u16 tinstr = 0;
>> int isize = 4;
>> @@ -784,16 +785,22 @@ static ssize_t alignment_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer
>>
>> instrptr = instruction_pointer(regs);
>>
>> + fs = get_fs();
>> + set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
>> if (thumb_mode(regs)) {
>> u16 *ptr = (u16 *)(instrptr & ~1);
>> - fault = probe_kernel_address(ptr, tinstr);
>> + fault = __copy_from_user(tinstr,
>> + (__force const void __user *)ptr,
>> + sizeof(tinstr));
>> tinstr = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(tinstr);
>> if (!fault) {
>> if (cpu_architecture() >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv7 &&
>> IS_T32(tinstr)) {
>> /* Thumb-2 32-bit */
>> u16 tinst2 = 0;
>> - fault = probe_kernel_address(ptr + 1, tinst2);
>> + fault = __copy_from_user(tinst2,
>> + (__force const void __user *)(ptr+1),
>> + sizeof(tinst2));
>> tinst2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(tinst2);
>> instr = __opcode_thumb32_compose(tinstr, tinst2);
>> thumb2_32b = 1;
>> @@ -803,10 +810,13 @@ static ssize_t alignment_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer
>> }
>> }
>> } else {
>> - fault = probe_kernel_address((void *)instrptr, instr);
>> + fault = __copy_from_user(instr,
>> + (__force const void __user *)instrptr,
>> + sizeof(instr));
>> instr = __mem_to_opcode_arm(instr);
>> }
>>
>> + set_fs(fs);
>> if (fault) {
>> type = TYPE_FAULT;
>> goto bad_or_fault;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-31 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-30 13:31 [PATCH] arm: fix page faults in do_alignment Jing Xiangfeng
2019-08-30 13:31 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2019-08-30 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 13:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 13:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 19:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-08-30 19:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-08-30 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 21:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-08-30 21:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-08-30 22:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-30 22:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-02 17:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-09-02 17:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-09-04 2:17 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2019-09-04 2:17 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2019-09-06 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-06 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-15 18:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-15 18:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-16 14:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-09-16 14:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-08-31 1:49 ` Jing Xiangfeng [this message]
2019-08-31 1:49 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2019-08-31 7:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-31 7:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-31 9:16 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2019-08-31 9:16 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2019-08-31 12:48 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5D69D239.2080908@huawei.com \
--to=jingxiangfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.