From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
nirmoy.das@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mm: prevent a potential null-pointer dereference
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:35:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5F5A1D80.2060902@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6c93d83-b47d-a004-8da9-92305024c4b7@amd.com>
On 2020/9/10 16:58, Christian König wrote:
> Am 10.09.20 um 04:38 schrieb Jing Xiangfeng:
>> The macro 'DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR' may hit a potential null-pointer
>> dereference. So use 'entry' after checking it.
>
> I don't see a potential null-pointer dereference here.
>
> Where should that be?
In current code,the "entry" pointer is checked after entry->rb_hole_addr.
Thanks
>
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Fixes: 5fad79fd66ff ("drm/mm: cleanup and improve next_hole_*_addr()")
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
>> index a4a04d246135..6fcf70f71962 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
>> @@ -392,11 +392,14 @@ first_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
>> #define DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR(name, first, last) \
>> static struct drm_mm_node *name(struct drm_mm_node *entry, u64
>> size) \
>> { \
>> - struct rb_node *parent, *node = &entry->rb_hole_addr; \
>> + struct rb_node *parent, *node; \
>> \
>> - if (!entry || RB_EMPTY_NODE(node)) \
>> + if (!entry) \
>> return NULL; \
>> \
>> + node = &entry->rb_hole_addr; \
>> + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(node)) \
>> + return NULL; \
>> if (usable_hole_addr(node->first, size)) { \
>> node = node->first; \
>> while (usable_hole_addr(node->last, size)) \
>
> .
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
nirmoy.das@amd.com
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mm: prevent a potential null-pointer dereference
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:35:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5F5A1D80.2060902@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6c93d83-b47d-a004-8da9-92305024c4b7@amd.com>
On 2020/9/10 16:58, Christian König wrote:
> Am 10.09.20 um 04:38 schrieb Jing Xiangfeng:
>> The macro 'DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR' may hit a potential null-pointer
>> dereference. So use 'entry' after checking it.
>
> I don't see a potential null-pointer dereference here.
>
> Where should that be?
In current code,the "entry" pointer is checked after entry->rb_hole_addr.
Thanks
>
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Fixes: 5fad79fd66ff ("drm/mm: cleanup and improve next_hole_*_addr()")
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
>> index a4a04d246135..6fcf70f71962 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
>> @@ -392,11 +392,14 @@ first_hole(struct drm_mm *mm,
>> #define DECLARE_NEXT_HOLE_ADDR(name, first, last) \
>> static struct drm_mm_node *name(struct drm_mm_node *entry, u64
>> size) \
>> { \
>> - struct rb_node *parent, *node = &entry->rb_hole_addr; \
>> + struct rb_node *parent, *node; \
>> \
>> - if (!entry || RB_EMPTY_NODE(node)) \
>> + if (!entry) \
>> return NULL; \
>> \
>> + node = &entry->rb_hole_addr; \
>> + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(node)) \
>> + return NULL; \
>> if (usable_hole_addr(node->first, size)) { \
>> node = node->first; \
>> while (usable_hole_addr(node->last, size)) \
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 2:38 [PATCH] drm/mm: prevent a potential null-pointer dereference Jing Xiangfeng
2020-09-10 2:38 ` Jing Xiangfeng
2020-09-10 8:58 ` Christian König
2020-09-10 8:58 ` Christian König
2020-09-10 12:35 ` Jing Xiangfeng [this message]
2020-09-10 12:35 ` Jing Xiangfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5F5A1D80.2060902@huawei.com \
--to=jingxiangfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@amd.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.