From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@intel.com>,
junxiao.chang@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Apply same width for offset definitions
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:09:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ca33880-a97f-24b4-1c48-92c1a649558b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190409112515.84725-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 4/9/19 4:25 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Apply same width for offset definitions to make code more consistent.
Looks good.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> index eb0b342996ca..9007aa717586 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> * The ARC handles the interrupt and services it, writing optional data to
> * the IPC1 registers, updates the IPC_STS response register with the status.
> */
> -#define IPC_CMD 0x0
> +#define IPC_CMD 0x00
> #define IPC_CMD_MSI BIT(8)
> #define IPC_CMD_SIZE 16
> #define IPC_CMD_SUBCMD 12
> @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@
> #define TELEM_SSRAM_SIZE 240
> #define TELEM_PMC_SSRAM_OFFSET 0x1B00
> #define TELEM_PUNIT_SSRAM_OFFSET 0x1A00
> -#define TCO_PMC_OFFSET 0x8
> -#define TCO_PMC_SIZE 0x4
> +#define TCO_PMC_OFFSET 0x08
> +#define TCO_PMC_SIZE 0x04
>
> /* PMC register bit definitions */
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 11:25 [PATCH v1 1/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use BIT() macro Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-09 11:25 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Apply same width for offset definitions Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-09 17:09 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy [this message]
2019-04-09 11:25 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Don't map non-used optional resources Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-10 18:05 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2019-04-09 11:25 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] platform/x86: intel_punit_ipc: Revert "Fix resource ioremap warning" Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-10 18:06 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
[not found] ` <7bb60283-f99f-679d-4efa-45962ccd68f3@linux.intel.com>
2019-04-09 17:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use BIT() macro Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-10 13:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-10 17:55 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ca33880-a97f-24b4-1c48-92c1a649558b@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=junxiao.chang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.