Are native packages dependencies listed in license.manifest?

Are native packages dependencies listed in license.manifest?

[pierrelucbuhler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 865 bytes --]

Hi,

I’m currently working to remove all GPLv3 packages included in my image.

I was using the license manifest file to list the remaining GPLv3 packages to remove.

While I was trying to remove gdbm, I ecountered some native dependencies.

When I looked at the license.manifest file, gdbm was still listed.

So I was asking myself if I still had packages that depends/includes gdbm hidden somewhere or it’s because the license.manifest also list packages used on the build host even if they are not included in the image.

For example, if curl-native is used in a recipe will curl be listed in license.manifest even if curl is not in the image?




So in other words, does license.manifest also includes native packages or it only lists the packages that make up the image (included in the image)?




Thanks for the support,




PLB

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2060 bytes --]

Re: Are native packages dependencies listed in license.manifest?

[Burton, Ross]

The image manifest lists what is being *distributed* so doesn't
include native dependencies.

Ross

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:50, <pierrelucbuhler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I’m currently working to remove all GPLv3 packages included in my image.
> I was using the license manifest file to list the remaining GPLv3 packages to remove.
> While I was trying to remove gdbm, I ecountered some native dependencies.
> When I looked at the license.manifest file, gdbm was still listed.
> So I was asking myself if I still had packages that depends/includes gdbm hidden somewhere or it’s because the license.manifest also list packages used on the build host even if they are not included in the image.
> For example, if curl-native is used in a recipe will curl be listed in license.manifest even if curl is not in the image?
>
> So in other words, does license.manifest also includes native packages or it only lists the packages that make up the image (included in the image)?
>
> Thanks for the support,
>
> PLB
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: Are native packages dependencies listed in license.manifest?

[Pierre-Luc Buhler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1403 bytes --]

Thanks for the response.

Have a nice day.

PLB

Le lun. 24 juin 2019, à 17 h 49, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> a
écrit :

> The image manifest lists what is being *distributed* so doesn't
> include native dependencies.
>
> Ross
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:50, <pierrelucbuhler@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I’m currently working to remove all GPLv3 packages included in my image.
> > I was using the license manifest file to list the remaining GPLv3
> packages to remove.
> > While I was trying to remove gdbm, I ecountered some native dependencies.
> > When I looked at the license.manifest file, gdbm was still listed.
> > So I was asking myself if I still had packages that depends/includes
> gdbm hidden somewhere or it’s because the license.manifest also list
> packages used on the build host even if they are not included in the image.
> > For example, if curl-native is used in a recipe will curl be listed in
> license.manifest even if curl is not in the image?
> >
> > So in other words, does license.manifest also includes native packages
> or it only lists the packages that make up the image (included in the
> image)?
> >
> > Thanks for the support,
> >
> > PLB
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > yocto mailing list
> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2043 bytes --]