* union in tpmif_tx_interface_t ?
@ 2005-09-08 17:56 NAHieu
2005-09-08 20:11 ` Stefan Berger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: NAHieu @ 2005-09-08 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Anybody knows why tpmif_tx_interface_t declares an union like below
(union has only 1 item)?
typedef struct {
union {
tpmif_tx_request_t req;
} ring[TPMIF_TX_RING_SIZE];
} tpmif_tx_interface_t;
Thanks,
H
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: union in tpmif_tx_interface_t ?
2005-09-08 17:56 union in tpmif_tx_interface_t ? NAHieu
@ 2005-09-08 20:11 ` Stefan Berger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Berger @ 2005-09-08 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NAHieu; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-devel-bounces
xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com wrote on 09/08/2005 01:56:49 PM:
> Anybody knows why tpmif_tx_interface_t declares an union like below
> (union has only 1 item)?
>
> typedef struct {
> union {
> tpmif_tx_request_t req;
> } ring[TPMIF_TX_RING_SIZE];
> } tpmif_tx_interface_t;
>
There used to be a tpmif_tx_response_t but that was removed. I might
remove the union some time or also use the defines to create a ring.
Stefan
>
> Thanks,
> H
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-08 20:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-08 17:56 union in tpmif_tx_interface_t ? NAHieu
2005-09-08 20:11 ` Stefan Berger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.