From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ff9b7296d0c98149b4c265f9b2549eea9bec345.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf0408ac-75ed-f00a-369b-db6cb2000587@intel.com>
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 11:08 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 08/06/2021 10:53, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> > On 6/8/21 10:44 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local
> > > memory, and
> > > restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager
> > > related
> > > bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some
> > > point. For
> > > stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to
> > > support a
> > > generic reserve interface.
> > >
> > > v2(Thomas):
> > > - bo->page_alignment is in page units, not bytes
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 26 +--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 55 +-----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 17 --
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 100 +++--------
> > > .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 170
> > > ++++++++++++------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c | 15 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > index c612275c36c9..5bf1d1945dd6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > @@ -181,11 +181,7 @@ static bool
> > > i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct
> > > ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
> > > /* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's
> > > LRU
> > > lists */
> > > - if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
> > > - return false;
> > > -
> > > - /* This isn't valid with a buddy allocator */
> > > - return ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, place);
> > > + return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj);
> > > }
> > > static void i915_ttm_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > @@ -328,11 +324,15 @@ i915_ttm_resource_get_st(struct
> > > drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
> > > struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
> > > ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, res->mem_type);
> > > + struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.region;
> > > if (man->use_tt)
> > > return i915_ttm_tt_get_st(bo->ttm);
> > > - return intel_region_ttm_node_to_st(obj->mm.region, res-
> > > >mm_node);
> > > + if (mr->is_range_manager)
> >
> > Did you look at moving this test into
> > intel_region_ttm_node_to_st())
>
> I guess I didn't like the _node since that seems to suggest
> drm_mm_node
> to me.
>
> What about something like:
> i915_ttm_resource_to_st(res, mr)
> intel_region_ttm_resource_to_st(mr, res)
intel_region_ttm_resource_to_st() would be nice I think. I think it
would be nice if the region ttm code could hide the manager selection.
/Thomas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ff9b7296d0c98149b4c265f9b2549eea9bec345.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf0408ac-75ed-f00a-369b-db6cb2000587@intel.com>
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 11:08 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 08/06/2021 10:53, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> > On 6/8/21 10:44 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local
> > > memory, and
> > > restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager
> > > related
> > > bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some
> > > point. For
> > > stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to
> > > support a
> > > generic reserve interface.
> > >
> > > v2(Thomas):
> > > - bo->page_alignment is in page units, not bytes
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 26 +--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 55 +-----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 17 --
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 100 +++--------
> > > .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 170
> > > ++++++++++++------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c | 15 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > index c612275c36c9..5bf1d1945dd6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> > > @@ -181,11 +181,7 @@ static bool
> > > i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct
> > > ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
> > > /* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's
> > > LRU
> > > lists */
> > > - if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
> > > - return false;
> > > -
> > > - /* This isn't valid with a buddy allocator */
> > > - return ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, place);
> > > + return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj);
> > > }
> > > static void i915_ttm_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > @@ -328,11 +324,15 @@ i915_ttm_resource_get_st(struct
> > > drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > > struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
> > > struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
> > > ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, res->mem_type);
> > > + struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.region;
> > > if (man->use_tt)
> > > return i915_ttm_tt_get_st(bo->ttm);
> > > - return intel_region_ttm_node_to_st(obj->mm.region, res-
> > > >mm_node);
> > > + if (mr->is_range_manager)
> >
> > Did you look at moving this test into
> > intel_region_ttm_node_to_st())
>
> I guess I didn't like the _node since that seems to suggest
> drm_mm_node
> to me.
>
> What about something like:
> i915_ttm_resource_to_st(res, mr)
> intel_region_ttm_resource_to_st(mr, res)
intel_region_ttm_resource_to_st() would be nice I think. I think it
would be nice if the region ttm code could hide the manager selection.
/Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-08 8:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] Add back the buddy allocator Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 9:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 9:48 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 9:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 9:53 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 10:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 10:08 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 10:14 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2021-06-08 10:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/ttm: restore min_page_size behaviour Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 9:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Add back the buddy allocator (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ff9b7296d0c98149b4c265f9b2549eea9bec345.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.