All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to avoid racing in between read and OPU dio write
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 18:25:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62c9301c-eea4-4e35-9b6e-04525769985a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515083219.1601289-1-bo.wu@vivo.com>

On 2024/5/15 16:32, Wu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:39:06AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> If lfs mode is on, buffered read may race w/ OPU dio write as below,
>> it may cause buffered read hits unwritten data unexpectly, and for
>> dio read, the race condition exists as well.
>>
>> Thread A                      Thread B
>> - f2fs_file_write_iter
>>   - f2fs_dio_write_iter
>>    - __iomap_dio_rw
>>     - f2fs_iomap_begin
>>      - f2fs_map_blocks
>>       - __allocate_data_block
>>        - allocated blkaddr #x
>>         - iomap_dio_submit_bio
>>                                - f2fs_file_read_iter
>>                                 - filemap_read
>>                                  - f2fs_read_data_folio
>>                                   - f2fs_mpage_readpages
>>                                    - f2fs_map_blocks
>>                                     : get blkaddr #x
>>                                    - f2fs_submit_read_bio
>>                                IRQ
>>                                - f2fs_read_end_io
>>                                 : read IO on blkaddr #x complete
>> IRQ
>> - iomap_dio_bio_end_io
>>   : direct write IO on blkaddr #x complete
>>
> Looks like every COW filesystem would meet this situation. What's the solution
> of other FS?

I missed to reply this...

Other cow filesystem like btrfs, it will update metadata after data IO completion,
so it is safe.

Thanks,

>> This patch introduces a new per-inode i_opu_rwsem lock to avoid
>> such race condition.
>>


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to avoid racing in between read and OPU dio write
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 18:25:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62c9301c-eea4-4e35-9b6e-04525769985a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515083219.1601289-1-bo.wu@vivo.com>

On 2024/5/15 16:32, Wu Bo wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:39:06AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> If lfs mode is on, buffered read may race w/ OPU dio write as below,
>> it may cause buffered read hits unwritten data unexpectly, and for
>> dio read, the race condition exists as well.
>>
>> Thread A                      Thread B
>> - f2fs_file_write_iter
>>   - f2fs_dio_write_iter
>>    - __iomap_dio_rw
>>     - f2fs_iomap_begin
>>      - f2fs_map_blocks
>>       - __allocate_data_block
>>        - allocated blkaddr #x
>>         - iomap_dio_submit_bio
>>                                - f2fs_file_read_iter
>>                                 - filemap_read
>>                                  - f2fs_read_data_folio
>>                                   - f2fs_mpage_readpages
>>                                    - f2fs_map_blocks
>>                                     : get blkaddr #x
>>                                    - f2fs_submit_read_bio
>>                                IRQ
>>                                - f2fs_read_end_io
>>                                 : read IO on blkaddr #x complete
>> IRQ
>> - iomap_dio_bio_end_io
>>   : direct write IO on blkaddr #x complete
>>
> Looks like every COW filesystem would meet this situation. What's the solution
> of other FS?

I missed to reply this...

Other cow filesystem like btrfs, it will update metadata after data IO completion,
so it is safe.

Thanks,

>> This patch introduces a new per-inode i_opu_rwsem lock to avoid
>> such race condition.
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-10  2:39 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to avoid racing in between read and OPU dio write Chao Yu
2024-05-10  2:39 ` Chao Yu
2024-05-14 16:09 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2024-05-14 16:09   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-05-15  1:42   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2024-05-15  1:42     ` Chao Yu
2024-05-15  4:42     ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2024-05-15  4:42       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-05-15  6:38       ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2024-05-15  6:38         ` Chao Yu
2024-06-06 10:31         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2024-06-06 10:31           ` Chao Yu
2024-05-15  8:32 ` Wu Bo via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-15  8:32   ` Wu Bo
2024-06-06 10:25   ` Chao Yu [this message]
2024-06-06 10:25     ` Chao Yu
2024-05-15  8:40 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-15  8:40   ` [f2fs-dev] " Markus Elfring via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-17  8:15 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-17  8:15   ` kernel test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-25 14:25 [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2024-06-26  2:01 ` Zhiguo Niu
2024-06-26  2:01   ` Zhiguo Niu
2024-06-26 14:52   ` Chao Yu
2024-06-26 14:52     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62c9301c-eea4-4e35-9b6e-04525769985a@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=bo.wu@vivo.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.