From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clarify eth_dev state management
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:46:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6571221.TDpU4kGvc7@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1490961533.git.gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
2017-03-31 14:04, Gaetan Rivet:
> 1. The hotplug API currently available in DPDK introduces the notion of
> device states (DEV_DETACHED, DEV_ATTACHED). These states are implicit
> and internal to the ethdev layer.
>
> 2. Device enumeration and access is done directly, without regard to the
> underlying state of a device. Applications are currently expected to cycle
> through the static rte_eth_devices array. Those using the hotplug API
> (rte_eth_dev_attach(), rte_eth_dev_detach()), are thus expected to deal
> themselves with possible discrepancies internal to the ethdev layer,
> i.e. avoid detached devices if necessary, without the state of the devices
> having been explicitly defined or exposed.
>
> 3. The hotplug API itself is not complete and cannot be used without
> introducing some bugs. Detaching a device will introduce inconsistencies in
> the device count, as explained in the related API.
> No function is exposed in the ethdev layer to permit applications to deal
> with it.
>
> This series addresses these issues so that:
>
> 1. Applications are not expected to manage the states of their devices, those
> should be kept internal to the ethdev layer.
>
> 2. The hotplug API is cleaner, with specific operations from the ethdev layer
> to be used if necessary.
>
> 3. Applications that are not interested in hotplug functionality are not concerned
> and do not require any change.
Applied, thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 15:40 [PATCH 0/4] clarify eth_dev state management Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: expose device states Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] ethdev: add device iterator Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] ethdev: count devices consistently Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-30 19:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-31 9:13 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-03-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] app/testpmd: use ethdev iterator to list devices Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-31 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] clarify eth_dev state management Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-31 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ethdev: expose device states Gaetan Rivet
2017-03-31 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ethdev: add device iterator Gaetan Rivet
2017-04-05 20:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-31 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] app/testpmd: use ethdev iterator to list devices Gaetan Rivet
2017-04-05 20:46 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6571221.TDpU4kGvc7@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.