All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] [m68k] IRQ: add handle_polled_irq() for timer based soft interrupts
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:59:40 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65b9e5f265b02af3b316e59e55450385@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311061149250.23353@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>

Thomas,

>>>> This is a temporary hack to allow timer based polling of the
>>>> Atari ROM port network and USB cards only. Suggestions on how to
>>>> properly handle this in the normal interrupt framework are most
>>>> welcome.
>
> So you're polling devices which have no hardware interrupt from the
> timer interrupt. Of course if there is no interrupt pending on one of
> these devices, this will trigger the spurious detector. By setting the
> POLL_INPROGRESS flag, you're preventing that.

That's the general idea, yes. I am aware I abuse the flag somewhat. 
This was
the least invasive fix I came up with (i.e. no risk to cause 
regressions elsewhere).
Adding a new IRQ flag would have been my preference, but that seemed a 
bit
bold at the time.

> Reading the demultiplex handler it seems you have no way to figure out
> which of the sub interrupts actually triggered the mfptimer_handler,
> right?

Correct.

> I'm not too happy about the POLL flag "abuse". I'd rather have such

Precisely why I asked for this to be reviewed, thanks,

> interrupts explicitely marked as polled by some other interrupt. That
> also excludes such interrupts from the spurious mechanism completely.
>
> Does the following patch solve the problem? You need to call
>
>      irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_IS_POLLED);
>
> when setting up the interrupt controller for those polled interrupt
> lines.

This should do the trick, from what I can see. I have tried to test it, 
but recent changes
to the m68k vmlinux.lds have thrown a monkey wrench in the works, it 
seems (kernels
just won't boot at all). I'll sort that out with Geert and report back.

Much obliged,

	Michael


>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
> -----------------
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 56bb0dc..7dc1003 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ typedef	void (*irq_preflow_handler_t)(struct 
> irq_data *data);
>   * IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT		- Interrupt can be migrated from process context
>   * IRQ_NESTED_TRHEAD		- Interrupt nests into another thread
>   * IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID		- Dev_id is a per-cpu variable
> + * IRQ_IS_POLLED		- Always polled by another interrupt. Exclude
> + *				  it from the spurious interrupt detection
> + *				  mechanism and from core side polling.
>   */
>  enum {
>  	IRQ_TYPE_NONE		= 0x00000000,
> @@ -94,12 +97,14 @@ enum {
>  	IRQ_NESTED_THREAD	= (1 << 15),
>  	IRQ_NOTHREAD		= (1 << 16),
>  	IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID	= (1 << 17),
> +	IRQ_IS_POLLED		= (1 << 18),
>  };
>
>  #define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK	\
>  	(IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOREQUEST | \
>  	 IRQ_NOAUTOEN | IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT | IRQ_LEVEL | IRQ_NO_BALANCING | \
> -	 IRQ_PER_CPU | IRQ_NESTED_THREAD | IRQ_NOTHREAD | IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID)
> +	 IRQ_PER_CPU | IRQ_NESTED_THREAD | IRQ_NOTHREAD | IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID 
> | \
> +	 IRQ_IS_POLLED)
>
>  #define IRQ_NO_BALANCING_MASK	(IRQ_PER_CPU | IRQ_NO_BALANCING)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/settings.h b/kernel/irq/settings.h
> index 1162f10..3320b84 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/settings.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/settings.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ enum {
>  	_IRQ_NO_BALANCING	= IRQ_NO_BALANCING,
>  	_IRQ_NESTED_THREAD	= IRQ_NESTED_THREAD,
>  	_IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID	= IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID,
> +	_IRQ_IS_POLLED		= IRQ_IS_POLLED,
>  	_IRQF_MODIFY_MASK	= IRQF_MODIFY_MASK,
>  };
>
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ enum {
>  #define IRQ_NOAUTOEN		GOT_YOU_MORON
>  #define IRQ_NESTED_THREAD	GOT_YOU_MORON
>  #define IRQ_PER_CPU_DEVID	GOT_YOU_MORON
> +#define IRQ_IS_POLLED		GOT_YOU_MORON
>  #undef IRQF_MODIFY_MASK
>  #define IRQF_MODIFY_MASK	GOT_YOU_MORON
>
> @@ -147,3 +149,8 @@ static inline bool 
> irq_settings_is_nested_thread(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_NESTED_THREAD;
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool irq_settings_is_polled(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_IS_POLLED;
> +}
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> index 7b5f012..a1d8cc6 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> @@ -67,8 +67,13 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc 
> *desc, bool force)
>
>  	raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
>
> -	/* PER_CPU and nested thread interrupts are never polled */
> -	if (irq_settings_is_per_cpu(desc) || 
> irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc))
> +	/*
> +	 * PER_CPU, nested thread interrupts and interrupts explicitely
> +	 * marked polled are excluded from polling.
> +	 */
> +	if (irq_settings_is_per_cpu(desc) ||
> +	    irq_settings_is_nested_thread(desc) ||
> +	    irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
>  		goto out;
>
>  	/*
> @@ -268,7 +273,8 @@ try_misrouted_irq(unsigned int irq, struct 
> irq_desc *desc,
>  void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
>  		    irqreturn_t action_ret)
>  {
> -	if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS)
> +	if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
> +	    irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
>  		return;
>
>  	/* we get here again via the threaded handler */
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" 
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-07  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-31  0:23 [PATCH 09/17] [m68k] IRQ: add handle_polled_irq() for timer based soft interrupts Michael Schmitz
2013-02-10 10:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-03-20  8:54   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-06 11:30     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-07  7:59       ` Michael Schmitz [this message]
2013-11-10  8:33       ` Michael Schmitz
2013-11-12 19:08         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-13  7:57           ` Michael Schmitz
2013-11-13 19:42       ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq: Prevent spurious detection for unconditionally polled interrupts tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65b9e5f265b02af3b316e59e55450385@gmail.com \
    --to=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.