From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: kill next_task
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:55:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66320dd7-5da2-992b-ff96-cfee867615bc@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230825161951.GA16878@redhat.com>
On 8/25/23 9:19 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> It only adds the unnecessary confusion and compicates the "retry" code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 16:18 [PATCH 0/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: use __next_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of next_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 22:45 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of get/put_task_struct Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: fix the skip_if_dup_files check Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 22:52 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-27 20:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-28 1:18 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-28 10:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-29 0:30 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-30 23:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-31 11:29 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-31 12:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 22:49 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: kill next_task Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 22:55 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: simplify the "next tid" logic Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 22:57 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: use __next_thread() rather than next_thread() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66320dd7-5da2-992b-ff96-cfee867615bc@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kuifeng@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.