From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] hugetlb: pass *next_nid_to_alloc directly to for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:21:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66af5bce84c9b6480feaa2ddaff199cd5722fcde.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240102131249.76622-5-gang.li@linux.dev>
On Tue, 2024-01-02 at 21:12 +0800, Gang Li wrote:
> The parallelization of hugetlb allocation leads to errors when sharing
> h->next_nid_to_alloc across different threads. To address this, it's
Suggest you say
With parallelization of hugetlb allocation across different threads,
each thread works on a differnet node to allocate pages from, instead
of all allocating from a common node h->next_nid_to_alloc. To address this, it's
> necessary to assign a separate next_nid_to_alloc for each thread.
>
> Consequently, the hstate_next_node_to_alloc and for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
> have been modified to directly accept a *next_nid_to_alloc parameter,
> ensuring thread-specific allocation and avoiding concurrent access issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
> ---
> This patch seems not elegant, but I can't come up with anything better.
> Any suggestions will be highly appreciated!
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 92448e747991d..a71bc1622b53b 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1464,15 +1464,15 @@ static int get_valid_node_allowed(int nid, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> * next node from which to allocate, handling wrap at end of node
> * mask.
> */
> -static int hstate_next_node_to_alloc(struct hstate *h,
> +static int hstate_next_node_to_alloc(int *next_nid_to_alloc,
> nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> {
> int nid;
>
> VM_BUG_ON(!nodes_allowed);
>
> - nid = get_valid_node_allowed(h->next_nid_to_alloc, nodes_allowed);
> - h->next_nid_to_alloc = next_node_allowed(nid, nodes_allowed);
> + nid = get_valid_node_allowed(*next_nid_to_alloc, nodes_allowed);
> + *next_nid_to_alloc = next_node_allowed(nid, nodes_allowed);
>
> return nid;
> }
> @@ -1495,10 +1495,10 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_free(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> return nid;
> }
>
> -#define for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(hs, nr_nodes, node, mask) \
> +#define for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, mask) \
> for (nr_nodes = nodes_weight(*mask); \
> nr_nodes > 0 && \
> - ((node = hstate_next_node_to_alloc(hs, mask)) || 1); \
> + ((node = hstate_next_node_to_alloc(next_nid_to_alloc, mask)) || 1); \
> nr_nodes--)
>
> #define for_each_node_mask_to_free(hs, nr_nodes, node, mask) \
> @@ -2350,12 +2350,13 @@ static void prep_and_add_allocated_folios(struct hstate *h,
> */
> static struct folio *alloc_pool_huge_folio(struct hstate *h,
> nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
> - nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry)
> + nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry,
> + int *next_nid_to_alloc)
> {
> gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
> int nr_nodes, node;
>
> - for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> + for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> struct folio *folio;
>
> folio = only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, node,
> @@ -3310,7 +3311,7 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> goto found;
> }
> /* allocate from next node when distributing huge pages */
> - for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, &node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
> + for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(&h->next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, &node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
> m = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(
> huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
> 0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
> @@ -3684,7 +3685,7 @@ static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
> VM_BUG_ON(delta != -1 && delta != 1);
>
> if (delta < 0) {
> - for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> + for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(&h->next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> if (h->surplus_huge_pages_node[node])
> goto found;
> }
> @@ -3799,7 +3800,8 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
> cond_resched();
>
> folio = alloc_pool_huge_folio(h, nodes_allowed,
> - node_alloc_noretry);
> + node_alloc_noretry,
> + &h->next_nid_to_alloc);
> if (!folio) {
> prep_and_add_allocated_folios(h, &page_list);
> spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 13:12 [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2024-01-10 10:19 ` Muchun Song
2024-01-11 3:30 ` Gang Li
2024-01-10 21:55 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-11 3:34 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2024-01-10 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-11 3:44 ` Gang Li
2024-01-16 7:02 ` Muchun Song
2024-01-16 8:09 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] padata: dispatch works on different nodes Gang Li
2024-01-11 17:50 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-12 7:09 ` Gang Li
2024-01-12 18:27 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-15 8:57 ` Gang Li
2024-01-17 22:14 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-18 6:15 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] hugetlb: pass *next_nid_to_alloc directly to for_each_node_mask_to_alloc Gang Li
2024-01-03 1:32 ` David Rientjes
2024-01-03 2:22 ` Gang Li
2024-01-03 2:36 ` David Rientjes
2024-01-11 22:21 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2024-01-12 8:07 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] hugetlb: have CONFIG_HUGETLBFS select CONFIG_PADATA Gang Li
2024-01-11 22:49 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-16 9:26 ` Muchun Song
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and initialization Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization Gang Li
2024-01-03 1:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot David Rientjes
2024-01-03 2:20 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66af5bce84c9b6480feaa2ddaff199cd5722fcde.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gang.li@linux.dev \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.