From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tony@atomide.com,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
Erik Gilling <konkers@android.com>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vsdummytimersupportruntime
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:34:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67a61c19606a2125fce3355d444a338f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110223195533.GC16041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:26 AM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; tony@atomide.com; David Brown; Daniel
> Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm; Colin
> Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers
> vsdummytimersupportruntime
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:41:38AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:33 AM
> > > To: Santosh Shilimkar
> > > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; linux-arm-
> > > kernel@lists.infradead.org; tony@atomide.com; David Brown;
> Daniel
> > > Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm;
> Colin
> > > Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs
> > > dummytimersupportruntime
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:28:11PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar
> wrote:
> > > > Patch 6759/1 and patch 6760/1 in patch system
> > >
> > > Was there any difference between 6760 and 6753 ?
> > Nope.
> > I just rebased them together and pushed
>
> Well, both patches are identical, so I'll stick with 6753/1 which
> I've already merged.
>
Thanks.
I got discarded messege for 6753, so I submitted it.
As you noticed, they are same.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vsdummytimersupportruntime
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:34:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67a61c19606a2125fce3355d444a338f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110223195533.GC16041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:26 AM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; tony at atomide.com; David Brown; Daniel
> Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm; Colin
> Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers
> vsdummytimersupportruntime
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:41:38AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux at arm.linux.org.uk]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 12:33 AM
> > > To: Santosh Shilimkar
> > > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; linux-arm-
> > > kernel at lists.infradead.org; tony at atomide.com; David Brown;
> Daniel
> > > Walker; Bryan Huntsman; Kukjin Kim; Paul Mundt; Magnus Damm;
> Colin
> > > Cross; Erik Gilling; Srinidhi Kasagar; Linus Walleij
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs
> > > dummytimersupportruntime
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:28:11PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar
> wrote:
> > > > Patch 6759/1 and patch 6760/1 in patch system
> > >
> > > Was there any difference between 6760 and 6753 ?
> > Nope.
> > I just rebased them together and pushed
>
> Well, both patches are identical, so I'll stick with 6753/1 which
> I've already merged.
>
Thanks.
I got discarded messege for 6753, so I submitted it.
As you noticed, they are same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-12 11:29 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: omap4 related fixes for 2.6.39 Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummy timer support runtime Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-15 4:13 ` David Brown
2011-02-15 4:13 ` David Brown
2011-02-15 4:15 ` David Brown
2011-02-15 4:15 ` David Brown
2011-02-16 12:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-16 12:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-20 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-20 11:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-20 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummy timersupport runtime Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-20 11:07 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 16:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-23 16:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-23 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummytimersupport runtime Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 16:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 17:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 17:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 19:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-23 19:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-23 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummytimersupportruntime Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 19:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-23 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-23 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-23 20:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-02-23 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vsdummytimersupportruntime Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] omap4: Enable ARM local timers with OMAP4430 es1.0 exception Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-14 21:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-14 21:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-18 18:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-18 18:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: l2x0: Errata fix for flush by Way operation can cause data corruption Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 17:50 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-12 17:50 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-12 17:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 17:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 23:17 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-12 23:17 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-14 5:08 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-14 5:08 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-14 19:33 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-14 19:33 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-14 21:06 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-14 21:06 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-15 7:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-15 7:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-15 9:10 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-15 9:10 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-15 9:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-15 9:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-16 12:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-16 12:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-16 15:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-16 15:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-16 15:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-18 12:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-18 12:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] omap2plus: omap4: Set NR_CPU to 2 instead of default 4 Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-14 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-14 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] omap4: Remove 'FIXME: omap44xx_sram_init not implemented' Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-12 11:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-14 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-14 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67a61c19606a2125fce3355d444a338f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=konkers@android.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.