From: syzbot <syzbot+019072ad24ab1d948228@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: ardb@kernel.org, jk@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [efi?] [fs?] possible deadlock in efivarfs_actor
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 18:52:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67cd0276.050a0220.14db68.006c.GAE@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: e056da87c780 Merge remote-tracking branch 'will/for-next/p..
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14ce9c64580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d6b7e15dc5b5e776
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=019072ad24ab1d948228
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: arm64
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=111ed7a0580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13b97c64580000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3d8b1b7cc4c0/disk-e056da87.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/b84c04cff235/vmlinux-e056da87.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2ae4d0525881/Image-e056da87.gz.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+019072ad24ab1d948228@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
efivarfs: resyncing variable state
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.14.0-rc4-syzkaller-ge056da87c780 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor772/6443 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000c6826558 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#16){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:877 [inline]
ffff0000c6826558 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#16){++++}-{4:4}, at: efivarfs_actor+0x1b8/0x2b8 fs/efivarfs/super.c:422
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000c6c7a558 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#16){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x3b4/0x5f4 fs/readdir.c:101
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#16);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#16);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by syz-executor772/6443:
#0: ffff80008fc57208 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lock_system_sleep+0x68/0xc0 kernel/power/main.c:56
#1: ffff80008fc75d70 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 kernel/notifier.c:379
#2: ffff0000c6c7a558 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#16){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x3b4/0x5f4 fs/readdir.c:101
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6443 Comm: syz-executor772 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc4-syzkaller-ge056da87c780 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 12/27/2024
Call trace:
show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:466 (C)
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xe4/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:129
print_deadlock_bug+0x4e8/0x668 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3039
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3091 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3893 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x6240/0x7904 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228
lock_acquire+0x23c/0x724 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851
down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:877 [inline]
efivarfs_actor+0x1b8/0x2b8 fs/efivarfs/super.c:422
dir_emit include/linux/fs.h:3849 [inline]
dcache_readdir+0x2dc/0x4e8 fs/libfs.c:209
iterate_dir+0x46c/0x5f4 fs/readdir.c:108
efivarfs_pm_notify+0x2f4/0x350 fs/efivarfs/super.c:517
notifier_call_chain+0x1c4/0x550 kernel/notifier.c:85
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x70/0xa0 kernel/notifier.c:380
pm_notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x3c kernel/power/main.c:109
snapshot_release+0x128/0x1b8 kernel/power/user.c:125
__fput+0x340/0x760 fs/file_table.c:464
____fput+0x20/0x30 fs/file_table.c:492
task_work_run+0x230/0x2e0 kernel/task_work.c:227
resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
do_notify_resume+0x178/0x1f4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:151
exit_to_user_mode_prepare arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:169 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:178 [inline]
el0_svc+0xac/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:745
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x108 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:762
el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-09 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-09 2:52 syzbot [this message]
2025-03-09 9:21 ` [syzbot] [efi?] [fs?] possible deadlock in efivarfs_actor Hillf Danton
2025-03-09 9:51 ` syzbot
2025-03-10 7:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-10 16:50 ` James Bottomley
2025-03-10 18:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-10 18:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-10 23:25 ` Al Viro
2025-03-10 23:58 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67cd0276.050a0220.14db68.006c.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+019072ad24ab1d948228@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.