[moderation/CI] Re: net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.

[moderation/CI] Re: net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.

[syzbot ci]

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v2] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811173116.2829786-1-kuniyu@google.com
* [PATCH v2 net-next 01/12] mptcp: Fix up subflow's memcg when CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA=n.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 02/12] mptcp: Use tcp_under_memory_pressure() in mptcp_epollin_ready().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 03/12] tcp: Simplify error path in inet_csk_accept().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 04/12] net: Call trace_sock_exceed_buf_limit() for memcg failure with SK_MEM_RECV.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 05/12] net: Clean up __sk_mem_raise_allocated().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 06/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_from_sk().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 07/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_sk_enabled().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_(un)?charge().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 09/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_under_memory_pressure().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 10/12] net: Define sk_memcg under CONFIG_MEMCG.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 11/12] net-memcg: Store MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED in sk->sk_memcg.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting.

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/6fc666d9-cfec-413c-a98c-75c91ad6c07d

***

kernel build error

tree:      net-next
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
base:      37816488247ddddbc3de113c78c83572274b1e2e
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 20.1.7 (++20250616065708+6146a88f6049-1~exp1~20250616065826.132), Debian LLD 20.1.7
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/a5d5d856-2809-4eee-87ca-2cd1630214ae/config

net/tls/tls_device.c:374:8: error: call to undeclared function 'sk_should_enter_memory_pressure'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

The email will later be sent to:
[akpm@linux-foundation.org almasrymina@google.com cgroups@vger.kernel.org davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com geliang@kernel.org hannes@cmpxchg.org horms@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org kuni1840@gmail.com kuniyu@google.com linux-mm@kvack.org martineau@kernel.org matttbe@kernel.org mhocko@kernel.org mkoutny@suse.com mptcp@lists.linux.dev muchun.song@linux.dev ncardwell@google.com netdev@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com roman.gushchin@linux.dev shakeel.butt@linux.dev tj@kernel.org willemb@google.com]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

Re: [moderation/CI] Re: net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.

[Aleksandr Nogikh]

#syz upstream

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 11:20 PM syzbot ci
<syzbot+ci5c068abc2c1451ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot ci has tested the following series
>
> [v2] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811173116.2829786-1-kuniyu@google.com
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 01/12] mptcp: Fix up subflow's memcg when CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA=n.
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 02/12] mptcp: Use tcp_under_memory_pressure() in mptcp_epollin_ready().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 03/12] tcp: Simplify error path in inet_csk_accept().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 04/12] net: Call trace_sock_exceed_buf_limit() for memcg failure with SK_MEM_RECV.
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 05/12] net: Clean up __sk_mem_raise_allocated().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 06/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_from_sk().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 07/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_sk_enabled().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_(un)?charge().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 09/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_under_memory_pressure().
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 10/12] net: Define sk_memcg under CONFIG_MEMCG.
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 11/12] net-memcg: Store MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED in sk->sk_memcg.
> * [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting.
>
> and found the following issue:
> kernel build error
>
> Full report is available here:
> https://ci.syzbot.org/series/6fc666d9-cfec-413c-a98c-75c91ad6c07d
>
> ***
>
> kernel build error
>
> tree:      net-next
> URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
> base:      37816488247ddddbc3de113c78c83572274b1e2e
> arch:      amd64
> compiler:  Debian clang version 20.1.7 (++20250616065708+6146a88f6049-1~exp1~20250616065826.132), Debian LLD 20.1.7
> config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/a5d5d856-2809-4eee-87ca-2cd1630214ae/config
>
> net/tls/tls_device.c:374:8: error: call to undeclared function 'sk_should_enter_memory_pressure'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>
> ***
>
> If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
> separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
> Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
>
> The email will later be sent to:
> [akpm@linux-foundation.org almasrymina@google.com cgroups@vger.kernel.org davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com geliang@kernel.org hannes@cmpxchg.org horms@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org kuni1840@gmail.com kuniyu@google.com linux-mm@kvack.org martineau@kernel.org matttbe@kernel.org mhocko@kernel.org mkoutny@suse.com mptcp@lists.linux.dev muchun.song@linux.dev ncardwell@google.com netdev@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com roman.gushchin@linux.dev shakeel.butt@linux.dev tj@kernel.org willemb@google.com]
>
> If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
> #syz upstream
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-upstream-moderation+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/689a5e98.050a0220.7f033.0102.GAE%40google.com.