All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [moderation/CI] Re: inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk
@ 2025-09-03 19:13 syzbot ci
  2025-09-03 21:51 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: syzbot ci @ 2025-09-03 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzkaller-upstream-moderation; +Cc: syzbot

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v1] inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250903024406.2418362-1-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev
* [PATCH net] inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk

and found the following issue:
inconsistent lock state in valid_state

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/e3eb0778-d6ff-4b0c-ae24-a5451a3472cb

***

inconsistent lock state in valid_state

tree:      net
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
base:      788bc43d8330511af433bf282021a8fecb6b9009
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/4fba502f-1812-45fd-881c-e5889996074b/config
C repro:   https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/1fde3273-fc6e-4ca1-9a99-a8f866c822cd/c_repro
syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/1fde3273-fc6e-4ca1-9a99-a8f866c822cd/syz_repro

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
syz.0.17/5984 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffffc90000069958 (&ptr[i]){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffffc90000069958 (&ptr[i]){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: __inet_lookup_established+0x71d/0x8d0 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:537
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
  __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
  _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
  spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
  __inet_lookup_established+0x71d/0x8d0 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:537
  tcp_v4_early_demux+0x4e1/0x9d0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1995
  ip_rcv_finish_core+0x108e/0x1c00 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:346
  ip_list_rcv_finish net/ipv4/ip_input.c:616 [inline]
  ip_sublist_rcv+0x397/0x9b0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:642
  ip_list_rcv+0x3e2/0x430 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:676
  __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:6034 [inline]
  __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x7d2/0x800 net/core/dev.c:6081
  __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:6133 [inline]
  netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x975/0xcc0 net/core/dev.c:6224
  gro_normal_list include/net/gro.h:532 [inline]
  gro_flush_normal include/net/gro.h:540 [inline]
  napi_complete_done+0x2f2/0x7c0 net/core/dev.c:6593
  e1000_clean+0xd0b/0x2b00 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3815
  __napi_poll+0xc7/0x360 net/core/dev.c:7506
  napi_poll net/core/dev.c:7569 [inline]
  net_rx_action+0x707/0xe30 net/core/dev.c:7696
  handle_softirqs+0x286/0x870 kernel/softirq.c:579
  __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:613 [inline]
  invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:453 [inline]
  __irq_exit_rcu+0xca/0x1f0 kernel/softirq.c:680
  irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:696
  common_interrupt+0xbb/0xe0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:318
  asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693
  native_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:48 [inline]
  pv_native_safe_halt+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c:81
  arch_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:107 [inline]
  default_idle+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:757
  default_idle_call+0x74/0xb0 kernel/sched/idle.c:122
  cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:190 [inline]
  do_idle+0x1e8/0x510 kernel/sched/idle.c:330
  cpu_startup_entry+0x44/0x60 kernel/sched/idle.c:428
  start_secondary+0x101/0x110 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:315
  common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
irq event stamp: 807
hardirqs last  enabled at (807): [<ffffffff8184e7fd>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x12d/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:412
hardirqs last disabled at (805): [<ffffffff8184e79e>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xce/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:389
softirqs last  enabled at (806): [<ffffffff8962777b>] local_bh_disable include/linux/bottom_half.h:20 [inline]
softirqs last  enabled at (806): [<ffffffff8962777b>] rcu_read_lock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:892 [inline]
softirqs last  enabled at (806): [<ffffffff8962777b>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x27b/0x3b50 net/core/dev.c:4650
softirqs last disabled at (798): [<ffffffff8962777b>] local_bh_disable include/linux/bottom_half.h:20 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (798): [<ffffffff8962777b>] rcu_read_lock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:892 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (798): [<ffffffff8962777b>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x27b/0x3b50 net/core/dev.c:4650

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&ptr[i]);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&ptr[i]);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.0.17/5984:
 #0: ffffffff8e139ee0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8e139ee0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8e139ee0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: inet_diag_find_one_icsk+0x2e/0x790 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:527

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5984 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_usage_bug+0x297/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4042
 valid_state+0xc3/0xf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4056
 mark_lock_irq+0x36/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4267
 mark_lock+0x11b/0x190 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4753
 mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:-1 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x9e2/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5191
 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
 __inet_lookup_established+0x71d/0x8d0 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:537
 __inet_lookup include/net/inet_hashtables.h:408 [inline]
 inet_lookup+0xc4/0x290 include/net/inet_hashtables.h:428
 inet_diag_find_one_icsk+0x1c1/0x790 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:529
 inet_diag_dump_one_icsk+0xa4/0x520 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:576
 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x3d5/0x4e0 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:628
 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1406 [inline]
 inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2b5/0x3b0 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1428
 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x4cc/0x600 net/core/sock_diag.c:-1
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x208/0x470 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2552
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1320 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x82f/0x9e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1346
 netlink_sendmsg+0x805/0xb30 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1896
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
 __sock_sendmsg+0x21c/0x270 net/socket.c:729
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x505/0x830 net/socket.c:2614
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x21f/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2668
 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2700 [inline]
 __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2705 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2703 [inline]
 __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x19b/0x260 net/socket.c:2703
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f0e1a18ebe9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd085aadc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0e1a3c5fa0 RCX: 00007f0e1a18ebe9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000200000000200 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f0e1a211e19 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f0e1a3c5fa0 R14: 00007f0e1a3c5fa0 R15: 0000000000000003
 </TASK>


***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

The email will later be sent to:
[davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com kernelxing@tencent.com kuba@kernel.org kuniyu@google.com luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn netdev@vger.kernel.org xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [moderation/CI] Re: inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk
  2025-09-03 19:13 [moderation/CI] Re: inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk syzbot ci
@ 2025-09-03 21:51 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandr Nogikh @ 2025-09-03 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot ci; +Cc: syzkaller-upstream-moderation, syzbot

#syz upstream

On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:13 PM syzbot ci
<syzbot+ci5cfb5e22bbd89274@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot ci has tested the following series
>
> [v1] inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250903024406.2418362-1-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev
> * [PATCH net] inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk
>
> and found the following issue:
> inconsistent lock state in valid_state
>
> Full report is available here:
> https://ci.syzbot.org/series/e3eb0778-d6ff-4b0c-ae24-a5451a3472cb
>
> ***
>
> inconsistent lock state in valid_state
>
> tree:      net
> URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
> base:      788bc43d8330511af433bf282021a8fecb6b9009
> arch:      amd64
> compiler:  Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
> config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/4fba502f-1812-45fd-881c-e5889996074b/config
> C repro:   https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/1fde3273-fc6e-4ca1-9a99-a8f866c822cd/c_repro
> syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/1fde3273-fc6e-4ca1-9a99-a8f866c822cd/syz_repro
>
> ================================
> WARNING: inconsistent lock state
> syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> --------------------------------
> inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
> syz.0.17/5984 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> ffffc90000069958 (&ptr[i]){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
> ffffc90000069958 (&ptr[i]){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: __inet_lookup_established+0x71d/0x8d0 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:537
> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
>   lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
>   __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
>   _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
>   spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
>   __inet_lookup_established+0x71d/0x8d0 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:537
>   tcp_v4_early_demux+0x4e1/0x9d0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1995
>   ip_rcv_finish_core+0x108e/0x1c00 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:346
>   ip_list_rcv_finish net/ipv4/ip_input.c:616 [inline]
>   ip_sublist_rcv+0x397/0x9b0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:642
>   ip_list_rcv+0x3e2/0x430 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:676
>   __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:6034 [inline]
>   __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x7d2/0x800 net/core/dev.c:6081
>   __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:6133 [inline]
>   netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x975/0xcc0 net/core/dev.c:6224
>   gro_normal_list include/net/gro.h:532 [inline]
>   gro_flush_normal include/net/gro.h:540 [inline]
>   napi_complete_done+0x2f2/0x7c0 net/core/dev.c:6593
>   e1000_clean+0xd0b/0x2b00 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3815
>   __napi_poll+0xc7/0x360 net/core/dev.c:7506
>   napi_poll net/core/dev.c:7569 [inline]
>   net_rx_action+0x707/0xe30 net/core/dev.c:7696
>   handle_softirqs+0x286/0x870 kernel/softirq.c:579
>   __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:613 [inline]
>   invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:453 [inline]
>   __irq_exit_rcu+0xca/0x1f0 kernel/softirq.c:680
>   irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:696
>   common_interrupt+0xbb/0xe0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:318
>   asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693
>   native_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:48 [inline]
>   pv_native_safe_halt+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c:81
>   arch_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:107 [inline]
>   default_idle+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:757
>   default_idle_call+0x74/0xb0 kernel/sched/idle.c:122
>   cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:190 [inline]
>   do_idle+0x1e8/0x510 kernel/sched/idle.c:330
>   cpu_startup_entry+0x44/0x60 kernel/sched/idle.c:428
>   start_secondary+0x101/0x110 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:315
>   common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
> irq event stamp: 807
> hardirqs last  enabled at (807): [<ffffffff8184e7fd>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x12d/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:412
> hardirqs last disabled at (805): [<ffffffff8184e79e>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xce/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:389
> softirqs last  enabled at (806): [<ffffffff8962777b>] local_bh_disable include/linux/bottom_half.h:20 [inline]
> softirqs last  enabled at (806): [<ffffffff8962777b>] rcu_read_lock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:892 [inline]
> softirqs last  enabled at (806): [<ffffffff8962777b>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x27b/0x3b50 net/core/dev.c:4650
> softirqs last disabled at (798): [<ffffffff8962777b>] local_bh_disable include/linux/bottom_half.h:20 [inline]
> softirqs last disabled at (798): [<ffffffff8962777b>] rcu_read_lock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:892 [inline]
> softirqs last disabled at (798): [<ffffffff8962777b>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x27b/0x3b50 net/core/dev.c:4650
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>        CPU0
>        ----
>   lock(&ptr[i]);
>   <Interrupt>
>     lock(&ptr[i]);
>
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by syz.0.17/5984:
>  #0: ffffffff8e139ee0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline]
>  #0: ffffffff8e139ee0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline]
>  #0: ffffffff8e139ee0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: inet_diag_find_one_icsk+0x2e/0x790 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:527
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5984 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  print_usage_bug+0x297/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4042
>  valid_state+0xc3/0xf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4056
>  mark_lock_irq+0x36/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4267
>  mark_lock+0x11b/0x190 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4753
>  mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:-1 [inline]
>  __lock_acquire+0x9e2/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5191
>  lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
>  __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
>  spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
>  __inet_lookup_established+0x71d/0x8d0 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:537
>  __inet_lookup include/net/inet_hashtables.h:408 [inline]
>  inet_lookup+0xc4/0x290 include/net/inet_hashtables.h:428
>  inet_diag_find_one_icsk+0x1c1/0x790 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:529
>  inet_diag_dump_one_icsk+0xa4/0x520 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:576
>  inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x3d5/0x4e0 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:628
>  inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1406 [inline]
>  inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2b5/0x3b0 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1428
>  sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x4cc/0x600 net/core/sock_diag.c:-1
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x208/0x470 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2552
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1320 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0x82f/0x9e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1346
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x805/0xb30 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1896
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
>  __sock_sendmsg+0x21c/0x270 net/socket.c:729
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x505/0x830 net/socket.c:2614
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0x21f/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2668
>  __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2700 [inline]
>  __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2705 [inline]
>  __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2703 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x19b/0x260 net/socket.c:2703
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f0e1a18ebe9
> Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffd085aadc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0e1a3c5fa0 RCX: 00007f0e1a18ebe9
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000200000000200 RDI: 0000000000000003
> RBP: 00007f0e1a211e19 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007f0e1a3c5fa0 R14: 00007f0e1a3c5fa0 R15: 0000000000000003
>  </TASK>
>
>
> ***
>
> If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
> separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
>   Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
>
> The email will later be sent to:
> [davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com kernelxing@tencent.com kuba@kernel.org kuniyu@google.com luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn netdev@vger.kernel.org xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev]
>
> If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
> #syz upstream
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-upstream-moderation+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/68b89342.050a0220.3db4df.01fe.GAE%40google.com.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-03 21:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-03 19:13 [moderation/CI] Re: inet: Avoid established lookup missing active sk syzbot ci
2025-09-03 21:51 ` Aleksandr Nogikh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.