All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Fix arm64 test installation
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 12:32:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68ccfd77-ce2f-857a-37a7-e9b3edcd495d@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230714112653.0b42d3c9818b038d219b5e41@linux-foundation.org>

On 7/14/23 12:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:19:11 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/14/23 11:09, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:48:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 7/13/23 14:16, John Hubbard wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Actually, I was hoping that my two fixes [1], [2] could be used, instead
>>>>> of reverting the feature.
>>>
>>>> Mark! Are you good with taking these two - do these fix the
>>>> problems you are seeing?
>>>
>>> I reviewed the one that's relevant to me already, the arm64 one, I'd not
>>> seen or tested the RISC-V one but that looks fine too.  I'm pretty sure
>>
>> That riscv patch already has a Tested-by from Alexandre Ghiti:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/f903634d-851f-af64-8d9a-6b13d813587c@ghiti.fr
>>
>>
>>> Andrew queued it already though ICBW.  Either way it'd be good to get
>>> this into -rc2, this is seriously disrupting arm64 CI and I'm guessing
>>> the RISC-V CI too.
>>
> 
> I just dropped
> selftests-arm64-fix-build-failure-during-the-emit_tests-step.patch and
> selftests-fix-arm64-test-installation.patch, as Shuah is merging them.
> 
> This is all rather confusing.  Perhaps a full resend of everything will
> help.  I'll assume that Shuah will be handling them.

Yes. Andrew - I am applying both as we speak. I found the right versions
with Tested-by tags.

These will appear very soon in linux-kselftest fixes and I will send
pull request for rc2.

thanks,
-- Shuah

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Fix arm64 test installation
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 12:32:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68ccfd77-ce2f-857a-37a7-e9b3edcd495d@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230714112653.0b42d3c9818b038d219b5e41@linux-foundation.org>

On 7/14/23 12:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:19:11 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/14/23 11:09, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:48:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 7/13/23 14:16, John Hubbard wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Actually, I was hoping that my two fixes [1], [2] could be used, instead
>>>>> of reverting the feature.
>>>
>>>> Mark! Are you good with taking these two - do these fix the
>>>> problems you are seeing?
>>>
>>> I reviewed the one that's relevant to me already, the arm64 one, I'd not
>>> seen or tested the RISC-V one but that looks fine too.  I'm pretty sure
>>
>> That riscv patch already has a Tested-by from Alexandre Ghiti:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/f903634d-851f-af64-8d9a-6b13d813587c@ghiti.fr
>>
>>
>>> Andrew queued it already though ICBW.  Either way it'd be good to get
>>> this into -rc2, this is seriously disrupting arm64 CI and I'm guessing
>>> the RISC-V CI too.
>>
> 
> I just dropped
> selftests-arm64-fix-build-failure-during-the-emit_tests-step.patch and
> selftests-fix-arm64-test-installation.patch, as Shuah is merging them.
> 
> This is all rather confusing.  Perhaps a full resend of everything will
> help.  I'll assume that Shuah will be handling them.

Yes. Andrew - I am applying both as we speak. I found the right versions
with Tested-by tags.

These will appear very soon in linux-kselftest fixes and I will send
pull request for rc2.

thanks,
-- Shuah

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-14 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-10 14:04 [PATCH] selftests: Fix arm64 test installation Mark Brown
2023-07-10 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2023-07-10 20:22 ` John Hubbard
2023-07-10 20:22   ` John Hubbard
2023-07-10 21:20   ` Mark Brown
2023-07-10 21:20     ` Mark Brown
2023-07-10 21:31     ` John Hubbard
2023-07-10 21:31       ` John Hubbard
2023-07-10 22:30       ` Mark Brown
2023-07-10 22:30         ` Mark Brown
2023-07-10 23:10         ` John Hubbard
2023-07-10 23:10           ` John Hubbard
2023-07-11 14:00           ` Mark Brown
2023-07-11 14:00             ` Mark Brown
2023-07-13 20:02 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-13 20:02   ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-13 20:16   ` John Hubbard
2023-07-13 20:16     ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 17:48     ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-14 17:48       ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-14 18:09       ` Mark Brown
2023-07-14 18:09         ` Mark Brown
2023-07-14 18:19         ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 18:19           ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 18:26           ` Andrew Morton
2023-07-14 18:26             ` Andrew Morton
2023-07-14 18:32             ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2023-07-14 18:32               ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-14 18:36               ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 18:36                 ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 19:11                 ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-14 19:11                   ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-14 19:39                   ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 19:39                     ` John Hubbard
2023-07-14 19:39                     ` John Hubbard
2023-07-18 14:54                   ` Mark Brown
2023-07-18 14:54                     ` Mark Brown
2023-07-18 14:56                     ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-18 14:56                       ` Shuah Khan
2023-07-18 14:57                       ` Mark Brown
2023-07-18 14:57                         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68ccfd77-ce2f-857a-37a7-e9b3edcd495d@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.