* [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics
@ 2026-10-26 14:48 Cen Zhang
2026-10-26 14:50 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cen Zhang @ 2026-10-26 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: matttbe, martineau, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni
Cc: geliang, horms, netdev, mptcp, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990,
jjzuming, zzzccc427
mptcp_diag_get_info() reports the accept queue of a listening MPTCP
socket by reading msk->first. The token based dump and the exact token
query only hold a reference on the MPTCP socket, which pins neither the
first subflow nor the listener hash bucket, and __mptcp_close_ssk()
drops the last reference on the first subflow before clearing
msk->first.
An application can disconnect a connected MPTCP socket with AF_UNSPEC,
which removes the token but retains the first subflow, listen on it
again and close it. A dump that obtained the MPTCP socket before the
disconnect then reads the backlog of a freed TCP listener:
Token diagnostic Application
mptcp_token_iter_next()
retain MPTCP socket
connect(AF_UNSPEC)
remove token, retain first
listen()
reuse first
mptcp_diag_get_info()
observe TCP_LISTEN
lsk = msk->first
close()
mptcp_destroy()
__mptcp_close_ssk()
release first
read lsk->sk_ack_backlog
The report below was decoded with scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh against
the 7.2.0-rc5 based test kernel that produced it, with the line numbers
mapped to this tree; only the relevant frames are kept:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mptcp_diag_get_info (net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c:209)
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888111763818 by task python3/499
Call Trace:
mptcp_diag_get_info (net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c:209)
inet_sk_diag_fill (net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:330)
mptcp_diag_dump (net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c:23 net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c:177)
__inet_diag_dump (net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:823)
netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2351)
Allocated by task 497:
sk_alloc (net/core/sock.c:2337)
inet_create (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:333)
__sock_create (net/socket.c:1679)
mptcp_subflow_create_socket (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1836)
__mptcp_nmpc_sk (net/mptcp/protocol.c:111 net/mptcp/protocol.c:143)
mptcp_setsockopt (net/mptcp/sockopt.c:313 net/mptcp/sockopt.c:916)
Freed by task 0:
slab_free_after_rcu_debug (mm/slub.c:6571)
rcu_core (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2919)
Second to last potentially related work creation:
__call_rcu_common.constprop.0 (kernel/rcu/tree.c:3287)
sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2446)
__sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2459)
sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2470)
__mptcp_close_ssk (include/net/sock.h:2024 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2721)
mptcp_destroy_common (net/mptcp/protocol.c:3579)
mptcp_destroy (net/mptcp/protocol.c:3815)
__mptcp_destroy_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:3421)
__mptcp_close (net/mptcp/protocol.c:3523)
mptcp_close (net/mptcp/protocol.c:3538)
inet_release (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:442)
The first subflow is a TCP socket: TCP listeners carry SOCK_RCU_FREE
and tcp_prot/tcpv6_prot sockets live in SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU caches, so
reading the two backlog counters under rcu_read_lock() is safe, and a
stale value is acceptable for diagnostics. mptcp_diag_dump_listeners()
already runs the formatter inside an RCU read-side section; only the
token dump and mptcp_diag_dump_one() reach it without one. Take
rcu_read_lock() around the msk->first snapshot and the backlog reads.
Fixes: 4fa39b701ce9 ("mptcp: listen diag dump support")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: LLM
---
Changes in v2:
- Take rcu_read_lock() around the first subflow reads instead of the MPTCP
data lock plus an owner check, as suggested by Eric Dumazet; this avoids
the new msk slock -> listener hash lock nesting and keeps ss reporting the
accept queue while the socket is owned.
- Decode the stack trace with scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh, map the line
numbers to this tree and keep only the relevant frames.
Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/pm-mptcp-objects-candidate-0066-v3-73df72b7a543d4cada0e@gmail.com
net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c b/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
index 136c2d05c0ee..28a42eee6651 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
@@ -200,8 +200,10 @@ static void mptcp_diag_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct inet_diag_msg *r,
r->idiag_wqueue = sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_LISTEN) {
- struct sock *lsk = READ_ONCE(msk->first);
+ struct sock *lsk;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ lsk = READ_ONCE(msk->first);
if (lsk) {
/* override with settings from tcp listener,
* so Send-Q will show accept queue.
@@ -209,6 +211,7 @@ static void mptcp_diag_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct inet_diag_msg *r,
r->idiag_rqueue = READ_ONCE(lsk->sk_ack_backlog);
r->idiag_wqueue = READ_ONCE(lsk->sk_max_ack_backlog);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
if (!info)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics
2026-10-26 14:48 [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics Cen Zhang
@ 2026-10-26 14:50 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-27 12:16 ` MPTCP CI
2026-10-27 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-10-26 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cen Zhang
Cc: matttbe, martineau, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, geliang, horms,
netdev, mptcp, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, jjzuming
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
analysis tool scan.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics
2026-10-26 14:48 [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics Cen Zhang
2026-10-26 14:50 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
@ 2026-10-27 12:16 ` MPTCP CI
2026-10-27 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2026-10-27 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cen Zhang; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Cen,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Perf: Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/40495986533
Initiator: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/c23b9941ddf0
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1193841
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics
2026-10-26 14:48 [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics Cen Zhang
2026-10-26 14:50 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-27 12:16 ` MPTCP CI
@ 2026-10-27 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-10-27 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cen Zhang; +Cc: mptcp
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mptcp: UAF in mptcp_diag_get_info() as __mptcp_close_ssk() puts ssk first
--
commit 54c0f83180af04b33f5796a4675ffc1cc6ddce9a
Author: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics
This commit wraps the msk->first lookup and the subsequent listener backlog
reads in mptcp_diag_get_info() with rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() to
prevent a use-after-free when a listening MPTCP socket is closed concurrently
with a token diagnostic dump.
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c b/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
> index 136c2d05c0eeb..28a42eee66512 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
> @@ -200,8 +200,10 @@ static void mptcp_diag_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct inet_diag_msg *r,
> r->idiag_wqueue = sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
>
> if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_LISTEN) {
> - struct sock *lsk = READ_ONCE(msk->first);
> + struct sock *lsk;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + lsk = READ_ONCE(msk->first);
> if (lsk) {
> /* override with settings from tcp listener,
> * so Send-Q will show accept queue.
> @@ -209,6 +211,7 @@ static void mptcp_diag_get_info(struct sock *sk, struct inet_diag_msg *r,
> r->idiag_rqueue = READ_ONCE(lsk->sk_ack_backlog);
> r->idiag_wqueue = READ_ONCE(lsk->sk_max_ack_backlog);
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
[Severity: High]
Can this still read from a freed lsk if mptcp_diag_get_info() in
net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c races with __mptcp_close_ssk() in
net/mptcp/protocol.c?
In net/mptcp/protocol.c:__mptcp_close_ssk(), the final reference on ssk is
dropped before msk->first is cleared:
out_release:
__mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk);
release_sock(ssk);
sock_put(ssk);
if (ssk == msk->first)
WRITE_ONCE(msk->first, NULL);
After release_sock(ssk), the closing task runs in preemptible process context
holding only the msk socket lock. Calling sock_put(ssk) initiates RCU
reclamation via sk_free() -> __sk_free() -> sk_destruct() -> call_rcu() while
msk->first still points to ssk.
In net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c:mptcp_diag_get_info(), the state check happens
before entering the RCU read-side critical section:
if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_LISTEN) {
struct sock *lsk;
rcu_read_lock();
lsk = READ_ONCE(msk->first);
If mptcp_diag_get_info() observes TCP_LISTEN and is preempted before calling
rcu_read_lock(), and concurrently close() -> __mptcp_close() ->
mptcp_destroy() -> mptcp_destroy_common() -> __mptcp_close_ssk() calls
sock_put(ssk) and is preempted before WRITE_ONCE(msk->first, NULL), the RCU
grace period for ssk can complete while msk->first remains non-NULL. When
mptcp_diag_get_info() resumes and enters rcu_read_lock(), wouldn't
READ_ONCE(msk->first) still load the freed ssk pointer and dereference
lsk->sk_ack_backlog and lsk->sk_max_ack_backlog?
Should __mptcp_close_ssk() clear msk->first with WRITE_ONCE(msk->first, NULL)
before calling sock_put(ssk), matching the ordering in mptcp_sk_clone_init()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/pm-mptcp-objects-candidate-0066-v5-4d1b83d62fcde2d57e8d@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-27 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-26 14:48 [PATCH net v2] mptcp: protect listener backlog reads in diagnostics Cen Zhang
2026-10-26 14:50 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-27 12:16 ` MPTCP CI
2026-10-27 14:48 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.