* [moderation/CI] Re: xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops
@ 2026-09-15 14:16 syzbot ci
2026-09-15 14:48 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: syzbot ci @ 2026-09-15 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzkaller-upstream-moderation; +Cc: syzbot
syzbot ci has tested the following series
[v6] xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915081023.7433-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com
* [PATCH bpf-next v6] xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops
and found the following issue:
possible deadlock in xp_clear_dev
Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/fd897794-4f0d-45f4-8e63-bcb526e0b175
***
possible deadlock in xp_clear_dev
tree: bpf-next
URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
base: b0ca562e0d05cf7afedcfa71c9aed180b72bcc97
arch: amd64
compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.8 (++20260613092233+e80beda6e255-1~exp1~20260613092250.77), Debian LLD 22.1.8
config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/d5521b86-a0b8-4ffc-ada4-91f534b028bc/config
syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/6aa094b3-5f39-460c-b0f7-709bbf72644c/syz_repro
netlink: 14 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz.1.18'.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.1.18/5842 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8881793b4e70 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2861 [inline]
ffff8881793b4e70 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff8881793b4e70 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xp_clear_dev+0x13b/0x340 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:297
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8881bd5ca6b8 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xsk_notifier+0xcd/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2114
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x19d/0x1550 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
xsk_bind+0x297/0x13f0 net/xdp/xsk.c:1620
__sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1945 [inline]
__sys_bind+0x2e3/0x410 net/socket.c:1976
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1981 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1979 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1979
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3181 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3300 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1520/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5253
lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x19d/0x1550 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2861 [inline]
netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
xp_clear_dev+0x13b/0x340 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:297
xsk_notifier+0x1a1/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2123
notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3d0 kernel/notifier.c:85
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2313 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2327 [inline]
unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x17f9/0x2140 net/core/dev.c:12518
rtnl_delete_link net/core/rtnetlink.c:3652 [inline]
rtnl_dellink+0x5be/0x810 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3694
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x802/0xc00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:7132
netlink_rcv_skb+0x226/0x4a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x7bd/0x940 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x13a/0x180 net/socket.c:800
__sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:815 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x54e/0x850 net/socket.c:2713
___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2767
__sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2799 [inline]
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2804 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2802 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1b1/0x290 net/socket.c:2802
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xs->mutex);
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#3);
lock(&xs->mutex);
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#3);
*** DEADLOCK ***
locks held by syz.1.18/5842: 3, last CPU#0:
#0: ffffffff90036ac0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock net/core/rtnetlink.c:80 [inline]
#0: ffffffff90036ac0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_net_lock include/linux/rtnetlink.h:134 [inline]
#0: ffffffff90036ac0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_dellink+0x41b/0x810 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3686
#1: ffff88810e3ac750 (&net->xdp.lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xsk_notifier+0x89/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2110
#2: ffff8881bd5ca6b8 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xsk_notifier+0xcd/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2114
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5842 Comm: syz.1.18 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2059
check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2191
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3181 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3300 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1520/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5253
lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x19d/0x1550 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2861 [inline]
netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
xp_clear_dev+0x13b/0x340 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:297
xsk_notifier+0x1a1/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2123
notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3d0 kernel/notifier.c:85
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2313 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2327 [inline]
unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x17f9/0x2140 net/core/dev.c:12518
rtnl_delete_link net/core/rtnetlink.c:3652 [inline]
rtnl_dellink+0x5be/0x810 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3694
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x802/0xc00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:7132
netlink_rcv_skb+0x226/0x4a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x7bd/0x940 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x13a/0x180 net/socket.c:800
__sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:815 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x54e/0x850 net/socket.c:2713
___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2767
__sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2799 [inline]
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2804 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2802 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1b1/0x290 net/socket.c:2802
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f47db99e159
Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f47dc90c028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f47dbc25fa0 RCX: 00007f47db99e159
RDX: 0000000004048004 RSI: 00002000000001c0 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f47dba3503b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f47dbc26038 R14: 00007f47dbc25fa0 R15: 00007ffc72db97b8
</TASK>
***
If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
To test a fix for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
(on a separate line) and attach the patch to the email.
Notes:
- The patch will be applied on top of the tested series (as an
incremental fix).
- To test a new version of the whole series, please send it directly
to syzbot@lists.linux.dev.
- Arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.
The email will later be sent to:
[ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com ast@kernel.org bpf@vger.kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net edumazet@google.com hawk@kernel.org horms@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com kuba@kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com magnus.karlsson@intel.com netdev@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com sdf@fomichev.me syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com]
If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream
If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [moderation/CI] Re: xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops
2026-09-15 14:16 [moderation/CI] Re: xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops syzbot ci
@ 2026-09-15 14:48 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandr Nogikh @ 2026-09-15 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot ci; +Cc: syzkaller-upstream-moderation, syzbot
#syz upstream
On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 4:16 PM syzbot ci
<syzbot+ci06f7dfaa8255f9ac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot ci has tested the following series
>
> [v6] xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915081023.7433-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com
> * [PATCH bpf-next v6] xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops
>
> and found the following issue:
> possible deadlock in xp_clear_dev
>
> Full report is available here:
> https://ci.syzbot.org/series/fd897794-4f0d-45f4-8e63-bcb526e0b175
>
> ***
>
> possible deadlock in xp_clear_dev
>
> tree: bpf-next
> URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
> base: b0ca562e0d05cf7afedcfa71c9aed180b72bcc97
> arch: amd64
> compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.8 (++20260613092233+e80beda6e255-1~exp1~20260613092250.77), Debian LLD 22.1.8
> config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/d5521b86-a0b8-4ffc-ada4-91f534b028bc/config
> syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/6aa094b3-5f39-460c-b0f7-709bbf72644c/syz_repro
>
> netlink: 14 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz.1.18'.
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz.1.18/5842 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff8881793b4e70 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2861 [inline]
> ffff8881793b4e70 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
> ffff8881793b4e70 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xp_clear_dev+0x13b/0x340 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:297
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff8881bd5ca6b8 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xsk_notifier+0xcd/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2114
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x19d/0x1550 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
> xsk_bind+0x297/0x13f0 net/xdp/xsk.c:1620
> __sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1945 [inline]
> __sys_bind+0x2e3/0x410 net/socket.c:1976
> __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1981 [inline]
> __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1979 [inline]
> __x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1979
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> -> #0 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3181 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3300 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x1520/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5253
> lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x19d/0x1550 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
> netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2861 [inline]
> netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
> xp_clear_dev+0x13b/0x340 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:297
> xsk_notifier+0x1a1/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2123
> notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3d0 kernel/notifier.c:85
> call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2313 [inline]
> call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2327 [inline]
> unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x17f9/0x2140 net/core/dev.c:12518
> rtnl_delete_link net/core/rtnetlink.c:3652 [inline]
> rtnl_dellink+0x5be/0x810 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3694
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x802/0xc00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:7132
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x226/0x4a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
> netlink_unicast+0x7bd/0x940 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
> netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
> sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x13a/0x180 net/socket.c:800
> __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:815 [inline]
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x54e/0x850 net/socket.c:2713
> ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2767
> __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2799 [inline]
> __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2804 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2802 [inline]
> __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1b1/0x290 net/socket.c:2802
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&xs->mutex);
> lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#3);
> lock(&xs->mutex);
> lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#3);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> locks held by syz.1.18/5842: 3, last CPU#0:
> #0: ffffffff90036ac0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock net/core/rtnetlink.c:80 [inline]
> #0: ffffffff90036ac0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_net_lock include/linux/rtnetlink.h:134 [inline]
> #0: ffffffff90036ac0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_dellink+0x41b/0x810 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3686
> #1: ffff88810e3ac750 (&net->xdp.lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xsk_notifier+0x89/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2110
> #2: ffff8881bd5ca6b8 (&xs->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xsk_notifier+0xcd/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2114
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5842 Comm: syz.1.18 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
> print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2059
> check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2191
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3181 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3300 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x1520/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5253
> lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x19d/0x1550 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
> netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2861 [inline]
> netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
> xp_clear_dev+0x13b/0x340 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:297
> xsk_notifier+0x1a1/0x230 net/xdp/xsk.c:2123
> notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3d0 kernel/notifier.c:85
> call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2313 [inline]
> call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2327 [inline]
> unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x17f9/0x2140 net/core/dev.c:12518
> rtnl_delete_link net/core/rtnetlink.c:3652 [inline]
> rtnl_dellink+0x5be/0x810 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3694
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x802/0xc00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:7132
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x226/0x4a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2556
> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
> netlink_unicast+0x7bd/0x940 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
> netlink_sendmsg+0x813/0xb40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1900
> sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x13a/0x180 net/socket.c:800
> __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:815 [inline]
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x54e/0x850 net/socket.c:2713
> ___sys_sendmsg+0x2a5/0x360 net/socket.c:2767
> __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2799 [inline]
> __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2804 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2802 [inline]
> __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1b1/0x290 net/socket.c:2802
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x166/0x520 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f47db99e159
> Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f47dc90c028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f47dbc25fa0 RCX: 00007f47db99e159
> RDX: 0000000004048004 RSI: 00002000000001c0 RDI: 0000000000000005
> RBP: 00007f47dba3503b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007f47dbc26038 R14: 00007f47dbc25fa0 R15: 00007ffc72db97b8
> </TASK>
>
>
> ***
>
> If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
> separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
> Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
>
> To test a fix for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
> (on a separate line) and attach the patch to the email.
>
> Notes:
> - The patch will be applied on top of the tested series (as an
> incremental fix).
> - To test a new version of the whole series, please send it directly
> to syzbot@lists.linux.dev.
> - Arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.
>
> The email will later be sent to:
> [ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com ast@kernel.org bpf@vger.kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net edumazet@google.com hawk@kernel.org horms@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com kuba@kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com magnus.karlsson@intel.com netdev@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com sdf@fomichev.me syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com]
>
> If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
> #syz upstream
>
> If the report is a false positive, reply with
> #syz invalid
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-upstream-moderation+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/6aa95355.f81106d8.2ab401.0069.GAE%40google.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-15 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-15 14:16 [moderation/CI] Re: xsk: Fix circular locking dependency between &net->xdp.lock, &xs->mutex, and netdev_lock_ops syzbot ci
2026-09-15 14:48 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.