* Question about drm-intel-next vs drm-intel-next-fixes for HDMI scrambling patch
@ 2026-07-29 16:16 Jerome Tollet
2026-07-29 21:23 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Tollet @ 2026-07-29 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jani.nikula
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal, ville.syrjala, arun.r.murthy, intel-gfx,
dri-devel, Jerome Tollet
Hi Jani,
I would like to better understand the i915 patch flow, rather than question
the decision itself.
The commit b7d51d65e4f1 ("drm/i915/hdmi: Poll for 200 msec for
TMDS_Scrambler_Status") was pushed to drm-intel-next on June 11. It was then
included in the July 2 drm-intel-next pull, described as the first feature
pull towards v7.3.
However, it was not included in the drm-intel-next-fixes pulls for v7.2,
including the June 25 pull, and it is consequently not present in v7.2-rc5.
Could you please explain how the decision is made to route a patch to
drm-intel-next versus drm-intel-next-fixes? In this particular case, was
there a technical or review reason why the patch was not considered for the
v7.2 fixes pull, or was it mainly a timing/queueing decision?
I am asking to understand the process for future contributions.
Thanks,
Jerome
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about drm-intel-next vs drm-intel-next-fixes for HDMI scrambling patch
2026-07-29 16:16 Question about drm-intel-next vs drm-intel-next-fixes for HDMI scrambling patch Jerome Tollet
@ 2026-07-29 21:23 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2026-07-29 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jerome Tollet
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal, ville.syrjala, arun.r.murthy, intel-gfx,
dri-devel, Jerome Tollet
On Wed, 29 Jul 2026, Jerome Tollet <jerome.tollet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> I would like to better understand the i915 patch flow, rather than question
> the decision itself.
>
> The commit b7d51d65e4f1 ("drm/i915/hdmi: Poll for 200 msec for
> TMDS_Scrambler_Status") was pushed to drm-intel-next on June 11. It was then
> included in the July 2 drm-intel-next pull, described as the first feature
> pull towards v7.3.
>
> However, it was not included in the drm-intel-next-fixes pulls for v7.2,
> including the June 25 pull, and it is consequently not present in v7.2-rc5.
>
> Could you please explain how the decision is made to route a patch to
> drm-intel-next versus drm-intel-next-fixes? In this particular case, was
> there a technical or review reason why the patch was not considered for the
> v7.2 fixes pull, or was it mainly a timing/queueing decision?
>
> I am asking to understand the process for future contributions.
All i915 patches get applied to drm-intel-next first, and fixes are
cherry-picked to drm-intel-fixes/drm-intel-next-fixes based on Fixes:
and Cc: stable trailers. In this case, the patch had neither, and none
were added while applying the patch.
It can still be cherry-picked for drm-intel-fixes if necessary.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-29 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-29 16:16 Question about drm-intel-next vs drm-intel-next-fixes for HDMI scrambling patch Jerome Tollet
2026-07-29 21:23 ` Jani Nikula
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.