From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com,
quic_sibis@quicinc.com, quic_nkela@quicinc.com,
souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: scmi: Allocate CLK operations dynamically
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 21:38:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7027a28723d2597d9f620f4e0e1da97e.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325210025.1448717-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Quoting Cristian Marussi (2024-03-25 14:00:21)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> index 8cbe24789c24..d5d369b052bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
> #define NOT_ATOMIC false
> #define ATOMIC true
>
> +enum scmi_clk_feats {
> + SCMI_CLK_ATOMIC_SUPPORTED,
> + SCMI_CLK_MAX_FEATS
> +};
> +
> +#define SCMI_MAX_CLK_OPS (1 << SCMI_CLK_MAX_FEATS)
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops *clk_ops_db[SCMI_MAX_CLK_OPS];
Can it be 'scmi_clk_ops_db' for some name spacing?
> static const struct scmi_clk_proto_ops *scmi_proto_clk_ops;
>
> struct scmi_clk {
> @@ -230,6 +202,106 @@ static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * scmi_clk_ops_alloc() - Alloc and configure clock operations
> + * @dev: A device reference for devres
> + * @feats_key: A bitmap representing the desired clk_ops capabilities.
Drop the period please because it's not consistent with the previous
argument descriptor.
> + *
> + * Allocate and configure a proper set of clock operations depending on the
> + * specifically required SCMI clock features.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to the allocated and configured clk_ops on Success,
Lowercase 'Success'.
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_clk_ops_select() - Select a proper set of clock operations
> + * @sclk: A reference to an SCMI clock descriptor
> + * @atomic_capable: A flag to indicate if atomic mode is supported by the
> + * transport
> + * @atomic_threshold: Platform atomic threshold value
Is this in nanoseconds, microseconds, or ??? Maybe a better description is
"clk_ops are atomic when clk enable_latency is less than X [time unit]"
> + *
> + * After having built a bitmap descriptor to represent the set of features
> + * needed by this SCMI clock, at first use it to lookup into the set of
> + * previously allocated clk_ops to check if a suitable combination of clock
> + * operations was already created; when no match is found allocate a brand new
> + * set of clk_ops satisfying the required combination of features and save it
> + * for future references.
> + *
> + * In this way only one set of clk_ops is ever created for each different
> + * combination that is effectively needed.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to the allocated and configured clk_ops on Success, or
Lowercase 'Success'.
> + * NULL otherwise.
> + */
> +static const struct clk_ops *
> +scmi_clk_ops_select(struct scmi_clk *sclk, bool atomic_capable,
> + unsigned int atomic_threshold)
> +{
> + const struct scmi_clock_info *ci = sclk->info;
> + unsigned int feats_key = 0;
> + const struct clk_ops *ops;
> +
> + /*
> + * Note that when transport is atomic but SCMI protocol did not
> + * specify (or support) an enable_latency associated with a
> + * clock, we default to use atomic operations mode.
> + */
> + if (atomic_capable && ci->enable_latency <= atomic_threshold)
> + feats_key |= BIT(SCMI_CLK_ATOMIC_SUPPORTED);
> +
Can we have a static_assert() here that makes sure 'feats_key' isn't
larger than the size of clk_ops_db?
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(clk_ops_db) >= feats_key);
> + /* Lookup previously allocated ops */
> + ops = clk_ops_db[feats_key];
> + if (!ops) {
> + ops = scmi_clk_ops_alloc(sclk->dev, feats_key);
> + if (!ops)
> + return NULL;
This could be less nested if the first lookup is put in
scmi_clk_ops_alloc() and the store below is folded in. Or an early
return if found.
ops = clk_ops_db[feats_key];
if (ops)
return ops;
/* Didn't find one */
ops = scmi_clk_ops_alloc(...)
if (!ops)
return NULL;
clk_ops_db[feats_key] = ops;
return ops;
> +
> + /* Store new ops combinations */
> + clk_ops_db[feats_key] = ops;
> + }
> +
> + return ops;
> +}
> +
> static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> {
> int idx, count, err;
> @@ -285,16 +357,10 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> sclk->ph = ph;
> sclk->dev = dev;
>
> - /*
> - * Note that when transport is atomic but SCMI protocol did not
> - * specify (or support) an enable_latency associated with a
> - * clock, we default to use atomic operations mode.
> - */
> - if (is_atomic &&
> - sclk->info->enable_latency <= atomic_threshold)
> - scmi_ops = &scmi_atomic_clk_ops;
> - else
> - scmi_ops = &scmi_clk_ops;
> + scmi_ops = scmi_clk_ops_select(sclk, is_atomic,
'is_atomic' should probably be 'transport_is_atomic' so this reads
easier.
> + atomic_threshold);
> + if (!scmi_ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Initialize clock parent data. */
> if (sclk->info->num_parents > 0) {
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com,
quic_sibis@quicinc.com, quic_nkela@quicinc.com,
souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: scmi: Allocate CLK operations dynamically
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 21:38:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7027a28723d2597d9f620f4e0e1da97e.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325210025.1448717-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Quoting Cristian Marussi (2024-03-25 14:00:21)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> index 8cbe24789c24..d5d369b052bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
> #define NOT_ATOMIC false
> #define ATOMIC true
>
> +enum scmi_clk_feats {
> + SCMI_CLK_ATOMIC_SUPPORTED,
> + SCMI_CLK_MAX_FEATS
> +};
> +
> +#define SCMI_MAX_CLK_OPS (1 << SCMI_CLK_MAX_FEATS)
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops *clk_ops_db[SCMI_MAX_CLK_OPS];
Can it be 'scmi_clk_ops_db' for some name spacing?
> static const struct scmi_clk_proto_ops *scmi_proto_clk_ops;
>
> struct scmi_clk {
> @@ -230,6 +202,106 @@ static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * scmi_clk_ops_alloc() - Alloc and configure clock operations
> + * @dev: A device reference for devres
> + * @feats_key: A bitmap representing the desired clk_ops capabilities.
Drop the period please because it's not consistent with the previous
argument descriptor.
> + *
> + * Allocate and configure a proper set of clock operations depending on the
> + * specifically required SCMI clock features.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to the allocated and configured clk_ops on Success,
Lowercase 'Success'.
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_clk_ops_select() - Select a proper set of clock operations
> + * @sclk: A reference to an SCMI clock descriptor
> + * @atomic_capable: A flag to indicate if atomic mode is supported by the
> + * transport
> + * @atomic_threshold: Platform atomic threshold value
Is this in nanoseconds, microseconds, or ??? Maybe a better description is
"clk_ops are atomic when clk enable_latency is less than X [time unit]"
> + *
> + * After having built a bitmap descriptor to represent the set of features
> + * needed by this SCMI clock, at first use it to lookup into the set of
> + * previously allocated clk_ops to check if a suitable combination of clock
> + * operations was already created; when no match is found allocate a brand new
> + * set of clk_ops satisfying the required combination of features and save it
> + * for future references.
> + *
> + * In this way only one set of clk_ops is ever created for each different
> + * combination that is effectively needed.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to the allocated and configured clk_ops on Success, or
Lowercase 'Success'.
> + * NULL otherwise.
> + */
> +static const struct clk_ops *
> +scmi_clk_ops_select(struct scmi_clk *sclk, bool atomic_capable,
> + unsigned int atomic_threshold)
> +{
> + const struct scmi_clock_info *ci = sclk->info;
> + unsigned int feats_key = 0;
> + const struct clk_ops *ops;
> +
> + /*
> + * Note that when transport is atomic but SCMI protocol did not
> + * specify (or support) an enable_latency associated with a
> + * clock, we default to use atomic operations mode.
> + */
> + if (atomic_capable && ci->enable_latency <= atomic_threshold)
> + feats_key |= BIT(SCMI_CLK_ATOMIC_SUPPORTED);
> +
Can we have a static_assert() here that makes sure 'feats_key' isn't
larger than the size of clk_ops_db?
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(clk_ops_db) >= feats_key);
> + /* Lookup previously allocated ops */
> + ops = clk_ops_db[feats_key];
> + if (!ops) {
> + ops = scmi_clk_ops_alloc(sclk->dev, feats_key);
> + if (!ops)
> + return NULL;
This could be less nested if the first lookup is put in
scmi_clk_ops_alloc() and the store below is folded in. Or an early
return if found.
ops = clk_ops_db[feats_key];
if (ops)
return ops;
/* Didn't find one */
ops = scmi_clk_ops_alloc(...)
if (!ops)
return NULL;
clk_ops_db[feats_key] = ops;
return ops;
> +
> + /* Store new ops combinations */
> + clk_ops_db[feats_key] = ops;
> + }
> +
> + return ops;
> +}
> +
> static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> {
> int idx, count, err;
> @@ -285,16 +357,10 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> sclk->ph = ph;
> sclk->dev = dev;
>
> - /*
> - * Note that when transport is atomic but SCMI protocol did not
> - * specify (or support) an enable_latency associated with a
> - * clock, we default to use atomic operations mode.
> - */
> - if (is_atomic &&
> - sclk->info->enable_latency <= atomic_threshold)
> - scmi_ops = &scmi_atomic_clk_ops;
> - else
> - scmi_ops = &scmi_clk_ops;
> + scmi_ops = scmi_clk_ops_select(sclk, is_atomic,
'is_atomic' should probably be 'transport_is_atomic' so this reads
easier.
> + atomic_threshold);
> + if (!scmi_ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Initialize clock parent data. */
> if (sclk->info->num_parents > 0) {
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 21:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] Rework SCMI Clock driver clk_ops setup procedure Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: scmi: Allocate CLK operations dynamically Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-30 3:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-08 4:38 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2024-04-08 4:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-08 18:23 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-04-08 18:23 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: scmi: Add support for state control restricted clocks Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-08 4:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-08 4:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-08 18:26 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-04-08 18:26 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: scmi: Add support for rate change " Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: scmi: Add support for re-parenting " Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: scmi: Add support for get/set duty_cycle operations Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-30 3:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-04 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Rework SCMI Clock driver clk_ops setup procedure Sudeep Holla
2024-04-04 14:25 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7027a28723d2597d9f620f4e0e1da97e.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.