All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>, 'Chao Yu' <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add a function to move nid
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 19:48:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70867f4c-e865-2acb-472a-8f24a7588d91@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001d34fdc$7d461260$77d23720$@samsung.com>

On 2017/10/28 19:03, Fan Li wrote:
> This patch add a new function to move nid from one state to another.
> Move operation is heavily used, by adding a new function for it 
> we can cut down some branches from several flow.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index ac629d6..8116b50
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1763,15 +1763,13 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>  }
>  
>  static int __insert_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> -			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state, bool new)
> +			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>  
> -	if (new) {
> -		int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -	}
> +	int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, state != i->state);
>  	nm_i->nid_cnt[state]++;
> @@ -1781,7 +1779,7 @@ static int __insert_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  }
>  
>  static void __remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> -			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state, bool reuse)
> +			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>  
> @@ -1789,8 +1787,23 @@ static void __remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	nm_i->nid_cnt[state]--;
>  	if (state == FREE_NID)
>  		list_del(&i->list);
> -	if (!reuse)
> -		radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
> +	radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
> +}
> +
> +static void __move_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct free_nid *i,
> +			enum nid_state org_state, enum nid_state dst_state)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> +
> +	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, org_state != i->state);
> +	i->state = dst_state;
> +	nm_i->nid_cnt[org_state]--;
> +	nm_i->nid_cnt[dst_state]++;
> +
> +	if (org_state == FREE_NID)

Welcome back to community, Fan. :)

Minor, how about "if (dst_stat == PREALLOC_NID)" ?

Otherwise this patch looks good to me, anyway, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,

> +		list_del(&i->list);
> +	else if (dst_state == FREE_NID)
> +		list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
>  }
>  
>  /* return if the nid is recognized as free */
> @@ -1850,7 +1863,7 @@ static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
>  		}
>  	}
>  	ret = true;
> -	err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, true);
> +	err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  err_out:
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	radix_tree_preload_end();
> @@ -1869,7 +1882,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>  	if (i && i->state == FREE_NID) {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  		need_free = true;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> @@ -2080,9 +2093,7 @@ bool alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid)
>  					struct free_nid, list);
>  		*nid = i->nid;
>  
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, true);
> -		i->state = PREALLOC_NID;
> -		__insert_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> +		__move_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, PREALLOC_NID);
>  		nm_i->available_nids--;
>  
>  		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, *nid, false, false);
> @@ -2108,7 +2119,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
> -	__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> +	__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID);
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  
>  	kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> @@ -2131,12 +2142,10 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
>  
>  	if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID);
>  		need_free = true;
>  	} else {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, true);
> -		i->state = FREE_NID;
> -		__insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__move_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, FREE_NID);
>  	}
>  
>  	nm_i->available_nids++;
> @@ -2167,7 +2176,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
>  				nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
>  			break;
>  
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>  		nr_shrink--;
>  	}
> @@ -2746,7 +2755,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  	/* destroy free nid list */
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>  		spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Fan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>,
	"'Chao Yu'" <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add a function to move nid
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 19:48:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70867f4c-e865-2acb-472a-8f24a7588d91@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001d34fdc$7d461260$77d23720$@samsung.com>

On 2017/10/28 19:03, Fan Li wrote:
> This patch add a new function to move nid from one state to another.
> Move operation is heavily used, by adding a new function for it 
> we can cut down some branches from several flow.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index ac629d6..8116b50
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1763,15 +1763,13 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>  }
>  
>  static int __insert_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> -			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state, bool new)
> +			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>  
> -	if (new) {
> -		int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -	}
> +	int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, state != i->state);
>  	nm_i->nid_cnt[state]++;
> @@ -1781,7 +1779,7 @@ static int __insert_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  }
>  
>  static void __remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> -			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state, bool reuse)
> +			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_state state)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>  
> @@ -1789,8 +1787,23 @@ static void __remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	nm_i->nid_cnt[state]--;
>  	if (state == FREE_NID)
>  		list_del(&i->list);
> -	if (!reuse)
> -		radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
> +	radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
> +}
> +
> +static void __move_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct free_nid *i,
> +			enum nid_state org_state, enum nid_state dst_state)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> +
> +	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, org_state != i->state);
> +	i->state = dst_state;
> +	nm_i->nid_cnt[org_state]--;
> +	nm_i->nid_cnt[dst_state]++;
> +
> +	if (org_state == FREE_NID)

Welcome back to community, Fan. :)

Minor, how about "if (dst_stat == PREALLOC_NID)" ?

Otherwise this patch looks good to me, anyway, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,

> +		list_del(&i->list);
> +	else if (dst_state == FREE_NID)
> +		list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
>  }
>  
>  /* return if the nid is recognized as free */
> @@ -1850,7 +1863,7 @@ static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
>  		}
>  	}
>  	ret = true;
> -	err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, true);
> +	err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  err_out:
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	radix_tree_preload_end();
> @@ -1869,7 +1882,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>  	if (i && i->state == FREE_NID) {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  		need_free = true;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> @@ -2080,9 +2093,7 @@ bool alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid)
>  					struct free_nid, list);
>  		*nid = i->nid;
>  
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, true);
> -		i->state = PREALLOC_NID;
> -		__insert_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> +		__move_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, PREALLOC_NID);
>  		nm_i->available_nids--;
>  
>  		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, *nid, false, false);
> @@ -2108,7 +2119,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
> -	__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> +	__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID);
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  
>  	kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> @@ -2131,12 +2142,10 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
>  
>  	if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID);
>  		need_free = true;
>  	} else {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, true);
> -		i->state = FREE_NID;
> -		__insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__move_free_nid(sbi, i, PREALLOC_NID, FREE_NID);
>  	}
>  
>  	nm_i->available_nids++;
> @@ -2167,7 +2176,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
>  				nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
>  			break;
>  
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>  		nr_shrink--;
>  	}
> @@ -2746,7 +2755,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  	/* destroy free nid list */
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->free_nid_list, list) {
> -		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID, false);
> +		__remove_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>  		spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-28 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20171028110400epcas1p2cd8fd0105884f449b5116b1ee9cf6092@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-10-28 11:03 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add a function to move nid Fan Li
2017-10-28 11:48   ` Chao Yu [this message]
2017-10-28 11:48     ` Chao Yu
2017-10-30  9:30     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-10-30  9:30       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-10-30 11:50       ` Fan Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70867f4c-e865-2acb-472a-8f24a7588d91@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=fanofcode.li@samsung.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.