From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:47:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70f8f208f631a2a2c7337f45b873a16e@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f3641ad49a2664d346558760e38b404@codeaurora.org>
On 2019-11-01 15:42, Wen Gong wrote:
> On 2019-10-31 17:08, Kalle Valo wrote:
> 、> I just realised that this is RX path so we should use
> ATH10K_SKB_RXCB()
>> instead. I made the change below to this commit in pending branch:
>>
> I will test with the new patch together with other performance patches.
Hi Kalle, I have tested with the patches of pending branch, it is
success.
result is same with the public review which I tested before.
the patches I tested on pending branch:
ath10k: enable alt data of TX path for sdio
ath10k: add htt TX bundle for sdio
ath10k: disable TX complete indication of htt for sdio
ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio
ath10k: sdio: remove struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data::status
ath10k: sdio: cosmetic cleanup
ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio
ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 for sdio
ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:47:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70f8f208f631a2a2c7337f45b873a16e@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f3641ad49a2664d346558760e38b404@codeaurora.org>
On 2019-11-01 15:42, Wen Gong wrote:
> On 2019-10-31 17:08, Kalle Valo wrote:
> 、> I just realised that this is RX path so we should use
> ATH10K_SKB_RXCB()
>> instead. I made the change below to this commit in pending branch:
>>
> I will test with the new patch together with other performance patches.
Hi Kalle, I have tested with the patches of pending branch, it is
success.
result is same with the public review which I tested before.
the patches I tested on pending branch:
ath10k: enable alt data of TX path for sdio
ath10k: add htt TX bundle for sdio
ath10k: disable TX complete indication of htt for sdio
ath10k: enable napi on RX path for sdio
ath10k: sdio: remove struct ath10k_sdio_rx_data::status
ath10k: sdio: cosmetic cleanup
ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio
ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 for sdio
ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 9:10 [PATCH v6 0/3] ath10k: improve throughout of RX of sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-25 9:10 ` Wen Gong
2019-09-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ath10k: enable RX bundle receive for sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-25 9:10 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-25 11:49 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-25 11:49 ` Kalle Valo
2019-09-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 " Wen Gong
2019-09-25 9:10 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 9:25 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 9:25 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 9:40 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 9:40 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 10:14 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 10:14 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 9:30 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 9:30 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 9:47 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 9:47 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 10:05 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 10:05 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 10:48 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 10:48 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-31 9:09 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-31 9:09 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-01 7:41 ` Wen Gong
2019-11-01 7:41 ` Wen Gong
2019-09-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] ath10k: add workqueue for RX path of sdio Wen Gong
2019-09-25 9:10 ` Wen Gong
2019-10-24 8:14 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-24 8:14 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-31 9:08 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-31 9:08 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-01 7:42 ` Wen Gong
2019-11-01 7:42 ` Wen Gong
2019-11-11 10:47 ` Wen Gong [this message]
2019-11-11 10:47 ` Wen Gong
2019-11-11 12:23 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-11 12:23 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-13 3:37 ` Wen Gong
2019-11-13 3:37 ` Wen Gong
2019-11-22 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-22 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70f8f208f631a2a2c7337f45b873a16e@codeaurora.org \
--to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.