From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add SFC support for RK3128
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 09:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7129744.aoefvbuG5b@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcff0181-b6de-4e47-b7ff-47baac061b3e@kernel.org>
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 08:41:19 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 05/06/2024 22:52, Alex Bee wrote:
> > This series adds support for the Serial Flash Controller (SFC) found in
> > RK3128 SoCs.
> >
> > As without using some "id holes" we would run out clock ids in the binding
> > and would have to touch the ABI, I added patches which removes the
> > CLK_NR_CLKS macro and uses the recently introduced
> > rockchip_clk_find_max_clk_id helper instead to find the highest clock id.
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > - added patches to remove CLK_NR_CLKS (Connor)
> >
>
> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
> interfere with applying entire sets.
>
> You sent now v2 immediately after. Confused.
it looks like Alex had some mail trouble yesterday.
The thread you Acked patches in actually is v2, just missing the label.
- original v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605172154.193047-1-knaerzche@gmail.com
- "unlabeled" v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605205209.232005-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/
- this as v2, but as reply to the previous
- real v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605210049.232284-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/
The last 3 are identical, just the sending process was somehow fumbled.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add SFC support for RK3128
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 09:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7129744.aoefvbuG5b@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcff0181-b6de-4e47-b7ff-47baac061b3e@kernel.org>
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 08:41:19 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 05/06/2024 22:52, Alex Bee wrote:
> > This series adds support for the Serial Flash Controller (SFC) found in
> > RK3128 SoCs.
> >
> > As without using some "id holes" we would run out clock ids in the binding
> > and would have to touch the ABI, I added patches which removes the
> > CLK_NR_CLKS macro and uses the recently introduced
> > rockchip_clk_find_max_clk_id helper instead to find the highest clock id.
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > - added patches to remove CLK_NR_CLKS (Connor)
> >
>
> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
> interfere with applying entire sets.
>
> You sent now v2 immediately after. Confused.
it looks like Alex had some mail trouble yesterday.
The thread you Acked patches in actually is v2, just missing the label.
- original v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605172154.193047-1-knaerzche@gmail.com
- "unlabeled" v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605205209.232005-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/
- this as v2, but as reply to the previous
- real v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605210049.232284-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/
The last 3 are identical, just the sending process was somehow fumbled.
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add SFC support for RK3128
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 09:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7129744.aoefvbuG5b@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcff0181-b6de-4e47-b7ff-47baac061b3e@kernel.org>
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 08:41:19 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 05/06/2024 22:52, Alex Bee wrote:
> > This series adds support for the Serial Flash Controller (SFC) found in
> > RK3128 SoCs.
> >
> > As without using some "id holes" we would run out clock ids in the binding
> > and would have to touch the ABI, I added patches which removes the
> > CLK_NR_CLKS macro and uses the recently introduced
> > rockchip_clk_find_max_clk_id helper instead to find the highest clock id.
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > - added patches to remove CLK_NR_CLKS (Connor)
> >
>
> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
> interfere with applying entire sets.
>
> You sent now v2 immediately after. Confused.
it looks like Alex had some mail trouble yesterday.
The thread you Acked patches in actually is v2, just missing the label.
- original v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605172154.193047-1-knaerzche@gmail.com
- "unlabeled" v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605205209.232005-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/
- this as v2, but as reply to the previous
- real v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605210049.232284-1-knaerzche@gmail.com/
The last 3 are identical, just the sending process was somehow fumbled.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 20:51 [PATCH 1/5] clk: rockchip: rk3128: Drop CLK_NR_CLKS usage Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:51 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:51 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: rk3128: Drop CLK_NR_CLKS Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-06 6:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 6:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 6:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: rk3128: Add HCLK_SFC Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-06 6:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 6:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 6:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] clk: rockchip: Add HCLK_SFC for RK3128 Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add SFC " Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add SFC support " Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-06 6:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 6:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 6:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 7:37 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-06-06 7:37 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-06 7:37 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-06-06 10:12 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-06 10:12 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-06 10:12 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: rockchip: rk3128: Drop CLK_NR_CLKS usage Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: rk3128: Drop CLK_NR_CLKS Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: rk3128: Add HCLK_SFC Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: rockchip: Add HCLK_SFC for RK3128 Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add SFC " Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 20:52 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 21:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] clk: rockchip: rk3128: Drop CLK_NR_CLKS usage Alex Bee
2024-06-05 21:03 ` Alex Bee
2024-06-05 21:03 ` Alex Bee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7129744.aoefvbuG5b@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=knaerzche@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.