All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	 John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] virtio-blk: report the effective zone write granularity
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 15:03:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <71d8cb90-8114-4c53-b786-2e3f0fdf81b6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825205748.679968-5-cassel@kernel.org>

On 8/26/26 05:57, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> For ZBC/ZAC devices the write granularity is the physical block size, so
> a 512e SMR disk exposed through a host_device backend has a logical block
> size of 512 and a zone write granularity of 4096. We told the guest driver 512
> while raw_co_zone_append() rejects anything that is not 4096 byte
> aligned, so the driver saw a plain I/O error for a request it had been
> told was valid.
> 
> Report the larger of the backend granularity and the logical block size
> instead. The guest driver cannot issue writes finer than the logical
> size, so the larger of the two is the constraint that applies. This
> matches what a Linux guest derives for itself: blk_validate_zoned_limits()
> raises zone_write_granularity to the logical block size, and
> blk_stack_limits() stacks it with max().
> 
> Add it as a helper next to blkconf_blocksizes(), since it is derived from
> a BlockConf and the limits of the backend below it, and use it for the
> zone append offset check in check_zoned_request(), which validated
> against bs->bl.write_granularity. The value reported to the driver and
> the value that requests are validated against then cannot drift apart.
> The helper cannot return zero because blkconf_blocksizes() always leaves
> a logical block size behind, so the check no longer needs to guard
> against an unset granularity.
> 
> Fixes: 4f7366506a96 ("virtio-blk: add zoned storage emulation for zoned devices")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-28  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25 20:57 [PATCH 00/12] block: fix the zone write granularity and the zone append limit Niklas Cassel
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 01/12] block: widen BlockLimits.zone_size to uint64_t Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  5:58   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 02/12] virtio-blk: do not merge writes across a zone boundary Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:02   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 03/12] file-posix: fix zone write granularity assignment for zoned block devices Niklas Cassel
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 04/12] virtio-blk: report the effective zone write granularity Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:03   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 05/12] virtio-blk: check the write granularity of writes to sequential zones Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:07   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-28  6:09     ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 06/12] hw/block: reject a zoned device whose write pointers are unaddressable Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:12   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 07/12] block: reject zone appends that are not a multiple of the sector size Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:13   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 08/12] file-posix: remove the zone append write granularity check Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:14   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 09/12] file-posix: base the zone append limit on the transfer limit Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 10/12] virtio-blk: derive the maximum zone append size Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:18   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 11/12] file-posix: reject a zone append past the device capacity Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:18   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-08-25 20:57 ` [PATCH 12/12] file-posix: reject a zone append to a full or conventional zone Niklas Cassel
2026-08-28  6:19   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=71d8cb90-8114-4c53-b786-2e3f0fdf81b6@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=faithilikerun@gmail.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.