From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support 32-bit accesses to 64-bit registers
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:49:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7269d265-154b-e79a-2622-287e149d85ad@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601030144.3458136-2-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
On 2023-06-01 04:01, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
> by the PMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index a3f1c410b417..88547a2b73e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -701,8 +701,12 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 val)
>
> if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
> offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);
> -
> - writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + if (!cspmu->impl.split_64bit_access) {
Could we not just hang this off the 64-bit atomicity property to match
the read path? It doesn't seem like there's much benefit in
micro-optimising for whether the interconnect splits 64-bit accesses
into 32-bit bursts vs. just not accepting them at all.
> + writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + } else {
> + writel(lower_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + writel(upper_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset + 4);
lo_hi_writeq() - the header's already included for 32-bit build
coverage, so we may as well put it to use :)
Thanks,
Robin.
> + }
> } else {
> offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index 51323b175a4a..c0412cf2bd97 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
> /* Vendor/implementer descriptor. */
> struct arm_cspmu_impl {
> u32 pmiidr;
> + bool split_64bit_access;
> struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops ops;
> void *ctx;
> };
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support 32-bit accesses to 64-bit registers
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:49:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7269d265-154b-e79a-2622-287e149d85ad@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601030144.3458136-2-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
On 2023-06-01 04:01, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
> by the PMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index a3f1c410b417..88547a2b73e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -701,8 +701,12 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 val)
>
> if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
> offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);
> -
> - writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + if (!cspmu->impl.split_64bit_access) {
Could we not just hang this off the 64-bit atomicity property to match
the read path? It doesn't seem like there's much benefit in
micro-optimising for whether the interconnect splits 64-bit accesses
into 32-bit bursts vs. just not accepting them at all.
> + writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + } else {
> + writel(lower_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + writel(upper_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset + 4);
lo_hi_writeq() - the header's already included for 32-bit build
coverage, so we may as well put it to use :)
Thanks,
Robin.
> + }
> } else {
> offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index 51323b175a4a..c0412cf2bd97 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
> /* Vendor/implementer descriptor. */
> struct arm_cspmu_impl {
> u32 pmiidr;
> + bool split_64bit_access;
> struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops ops;
> void *ctx;
> };
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 3:01 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support 32-bit accesses to 64-bit registers Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 14:49 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-06-01 14:49 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02 6:47 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 6:47 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support shared interrupts Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 14:54 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-01 14:54 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02 7:04 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 7:04 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 11:25 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02 11:25 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-01 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific event validation Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 15:09 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-01 15:09 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02 7:09 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 7:09 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 3:01 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-01 15:23 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-01 15:23 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02 7:13 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 7:13 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-02 11:51 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-02 11:51 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-03 1:16 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-03 1:16 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7269d265-154b-e79a-2622-287e149d85ad@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=bwicaksono@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.