All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Emilio López" <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, wens@csie.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: delay protected clocks until arch initcall
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:14:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7334994.mKnQpNNMP2@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127153722.GC4317@lukather>

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2016, 16:37:22 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> I thought the patches were simply dropped and the
> rockchip people just took another approach.

nope still on track ... especially as it was Stephen's believe that orphans 
shouldn't even be usable to general clock users :-).

I just remember that the proposed general solution was based on Mike's 
upcoming generic critical clock handling (the handoff thingy), which would 
move critical clock handling out of architecture-specific code, so I've been 
prodding Mike mainly.

Another option might be to allow clock-controllers to handle orphans and only 
deny orphan usage to outside clock users, maybe expanding on what I did with 
the clock-conf part in patch2.


Heiko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: delay protected clocks until arch initcall
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:14:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7334994.mKnQpNNMP2@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127153722.GC4317@lukather>

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2016, 16:37:22 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> I thought the patches were simply dropped and the
> rockchip people just took another approach.

nope still on track ... especially as it was Stephen's believe that orphans 
shouldn't even be usable to general clock users :-).

I just remember that the proposed general solution was based on Mike's 
upcoming generic critical clock handling (the handoff thingy), which would 
move critical clock handling out of architecture-specific code, so I've been 
prodding Mike mainly.

Another option might be to allow clock-controllers to handle orphans and only 
deny orphan usage to outside clock users, maybe expanding on what I did with 
the clock-conf part in patch2.


Heiko

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-21 14:10 [PATCH 0/2] defer clk_gets on orphan clocks Emilio López
2016-01-21 14:10 ` Emilio López
2016-01-21 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: delay protected clocks until arch initcall Emilio López
2016-01-21 14:10   ` Emilio López
2016-01-27 15:37   ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 15:37     ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 16:14     ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2016-01-27 16:14       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-27 20:38       ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 20:38         ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-27 21:07         ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-27 21:07           ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-27 18:53     ` Emilio López
2016-01-27 18:53       ` Emilio López
2016-02-01 19:32       ` Maxime Ripard
2016-02-01 19:32         ` Maxime Ripard
2016-01-21 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: defer clk_gets on orphan clocks Emilio López
2016-01-21 14:19   ` Emilio López
2016-01-28  8:23   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-28  8:23     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-28  9:03     ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-28  9:03       ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-29 19:54       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-29 19:54         ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7334994.mKnQpNNMP2@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.