From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>,
berrange@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
jrossi@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: david@kernel.org, walling@linux.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
farman@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, alifm@linux.ibm.com,
brueckner@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 19/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 11:48:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <735836e5-c13f-46ee-8af2-d4d0effe281e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260212204352.1044699-20-zycai@linux.ibm.com>
On 12/02/2026 21.43, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
> Enable secure IPL in audit mode, which performs signature verification,
> but any error does not terminate the boot process. Only warnings will be
> logged to the console instead.
>
> Add a comp_len variable to store the length of a segment in
> zipl_load_segment. comp_len variable is necessary to store the
> calculated segment length and is used during signature verification.
> Return the length on success, or a negative return code on failure.
>
> Secure IPL in audit mode requires at least one certificate provided in
> the key store along with necessary facilities (Secure IPL Facility,
> Certificate Store Facility and secure IPL extension support).
>
> Note: Secure IPL in audit mode is implemented for the SCSI scheme of
> virtio-blk/virtio-scsi devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> index b1dc35cded..1b43817af9 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ typedef unsigned long long u64;
> #define MIN_NON_ZERO(a, b) ((a) == 0 ? (b) : \
> ((b) == 0 ? (a) : (MIN(a, b))))
> #endif
> +#ifndef ROUND_UP
> +#define ROUND_UP(n, d) (((n) + (d) - 1) & -(0 ? (n) : (d)))
> +#endif
That reason for the "0 ?" is quite hard to understand without any comments
... it would be nice if you could add a similar remark here as we have it
already in osdep.h for the corresponding macro.
> #define ARRAY_SIZE(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof((a)[0]))
>
> @@ -64,6 +67,8 @@ void sclp_print(const char *string);
> void sclp_set_write_mask(uint32_t receive_mask, uint32_t send_mask);
> void sclp_setup(void);
> void sclp_get_loadparm_ascii(char *loadparm);
> +bool sclp_is_diag320_on(void);
> +bool sclp_is_sipl_on(void);
> int sclp_read(char *str, size_t count);
>
> /* virtio.c */
> @@ -76,6 +81,15 @@ int virtio_read(unsigned long sector, void *load_addr);
> /* bootmap.c */
> void zipl_load(void);
>
> +typedef enum ZiplBootMode {
> + ZIPL_BOOT_MODE_NORMAL = 0,
> + ZIPL_BOOT_MODE_SECURE_AUDIT = 1,
> +} ZiplBootMode;
> +
> +extern ZiplBootMode boot_mode;
> +
> +ZiplBootMode get_boot_mode(uint8_t hdr_flags);
> +
> /* jump2ipl.c */
> void write_reset_psw(uint64_t psw);
> int jump_to_IPL_code(uint64_t address);
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/sclp.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/sclp.c
> index 4a07de018d..f7514b0245 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/sclp.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/sclp.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,49 @@ void sclp_get_loadparm_ascii(char *loadparm)
> }
> }
>
> +static void sclp_get_fac134(uint8_t *fac134)
> +{
> + ReadInfo *sccb = (void *)_sccb;
> +
> + memset((char *)_sccb, 0, sizeof(ReadInfo));
> + sccb->h.length = SCCB_SIZE;
> + if (!sclp_service_call(SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO, sccb)) {
> + *fac134 = sccb->fac134;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +bool sclp_is_diag320_on(void)
> +{
> + uint8_t fac134 = 0;
> +
> + sclp_get_fac134(&fac134);
> + return fac134 & SCCB_FAC134_DIAG320_BIT;
> +}
Unless you want to use sclp_get_fac134() later in other spots, too, I'd
maybe merge its code directly into the sclp_is_diag320_on() function instead.
...
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..1d5c2d40ce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
> +/*
> + * S/390 Secure IPL
> + *
> + * Functions to support IPL in secure boot mode (DIAG 320, DIAG 508,
> + * signature verification, and certificate handling).
> + *
> + * For secure IPL overview: docs/system/s390x/secure-ipl.rst
> + * For secure IPL technical: docs/specs/s390x-secure-ipl.rst
> + *
> + * Copyright 2025 IBM Corp.
> + * Author(s): Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include "bootmap.h"
> +#include "s390-ccw.h"
> +#include "secure-ipl.h"
> +
> +uint8_t vcssb_data[VCSSB_MIN_LEN] __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
Please mark the array as "static" unless you want to use it from another
file later.
> +VCStorageSizeBlock *zipl_secure_get_vcssb(void)
> +{
> + VCStorageSizeBlock *vcssb;
> +
> + vcssb = (VCStorageSizeBlock *)vcssb_data;
> + /* avoid retrieving vcssb multiple times */
> + if (vcssb->length >= VCSSB_MIN_LEN) {
So in case we find VCSSB_MIN_LEN, we assume that it is ok ...
> + return vcssb;
> + }
> +
> + if (!is_cert_store_facility_supported()) {
> + puts("Certificate Store Facility is not supported by the hypervisor!");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + vcssb->length = VCSSB_MIN_LEN;
... and here we set VCSSB_MIN_LEN ...
> + if (diag320(vcssb, DIAG_320_SUBC_QUERY_VCSI) != DIAG_320_RC_OK) {
... but in case of errors, we leave the VCSSB_MIN_LEN in the buffer, so the
next time this function gets called we will assume the buffer is fine,
though the initialization failed for the first time. ==> I think you need to
reset vcssb->length here or add some different logic to avoid this situation.
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return vcssb;
> +}
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-12 20:43 [PATCH v8 00/30] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 01/30] Add boot-certs to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-17 8:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 02/30] crypto/x509-utils: Refactor with GNUTLS fallback Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 03/30] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 04/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-26 16:02 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-28 1:45 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-05 21:34 ` Farhan Ali
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 05/30] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for Certificate Store Facility Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-27 12:41 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-28 1:47 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 06/30] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-27 12:46 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 07/30] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-27 12:58 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-28 2:15 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-28 12:51 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 08/30] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-28 13:43 ` Thomas Huth
2026-03-03 21:02 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-04 7:26 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 09/30] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-17 8:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2026-02-17 21:29 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-28 2:25 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-28 14:07 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 10/30] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 11/30] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 12/30] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-03 20:22 ` Farhan Ali
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 13/30] s390x/ipl: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-03 20:38 ` Farhan Ali
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 14/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 9:56 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 15/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 16/30] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 10:03 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 17/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 18/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Rework zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 19/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 10:48 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2026-03-03 21:46 ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-04 22:17 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 20/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signed component address overlap checks Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 11:01 ` Thomas Huth
2026-03-03 22:07 ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-03 22:36 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 21/30] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-17 8:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2026-02-17 8:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 22/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 11:24 ` Thomas Huth
2026-03-03 21:17 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 23/30] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 24/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 11:34 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 25/30] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 12:53 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 26/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 12:59 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 27/30] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 28/30] tests/functional/s390x: Add secure IPL functional test Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 13:35 ` Thomas Huth
2026-03-03 22:07 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 29/30] docs/specs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 13:45 ` Thomas Huth
2026-02-12 20:43 ` [PATCH v8 30/30] docs/system/s390x: " Zhuoying Cai
2026-02-17 8:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2026-02-17 8:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2026-02-17 20:29 ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-03-02 16:24 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=735836e5-c13f-46ee-8af2-d4d0effe281e@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.