All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@knobisoft.de>
To: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sluggish writeback fixes
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 04:04:14 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7370.7646.qm@web32603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <391315777.14430@ustc.edu.cn>


--- Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:

> Andrew,
> 
> The following patches fix the sluggish writeback behavior.
> They are well understood and well tested - but not yet widely tested.
> 
> The first patch reverts the debugging -mm only
> check_dirty_inode_list.patch -
> which is no longer necessary.
> 
> The following 4 patches do the real jobs:
> 
> [PATCH 2/5] writeback: fix time ordering of the per superblock inode
> lists 8
> [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes()
> [PATCH 4/5] writeback: remove pages_skipped accounting in
> __block_write_full_page()
> [PATCH 5/5] writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to
> indicate more io
> 
> They share the same goal as the following patches in -mm. Therefore
> I'd
> recommend to put the last 4 new ones after them:
> 
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists.patch
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists-2.patch
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists-3.patch
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists-4.patch
> writeback-fix-comment-use-helper-function.patch
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists-5.patch
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists-6.patch
>
writeback-fix-time-ordering-of-the-per-superblock-dirty-inode-lists-7.patch
> writeback-fix-periodic-superblock-dirty-inode-flushing.patch
> 
> Regards,
> Fengguang
Hi Fenguang,

 now that Peters stuff seems to make it into mainline, do you think
your fixes should go in as well? Would definitely help to broaden the
tester base. Definitely by one very interested tester :-)

Keep on the good work
Martin

------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www:   http://www.knobisoft.de

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-02  8:41 [PATCH 0/5] sluggish writeback fixes Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-03 11:04   ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2007-10-02  8:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] revert check_dirty_inode_list.patch Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: fix time ordering of the per superblock inode lists 8 Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes() Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: remove pages_skipped accounting in __block_write_full_page() Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-04 21:26     ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-02 21:55   ` David Chinner
2007-10-03  1:43     ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-03  1:43       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-03  2:22       ` David Chinner
2007-10-02  8:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02  8:41   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-02 21:47   ` David Chinner
2007-10-03  1:34     ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-03  1:34       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-03  2:41       ` David Chinner
2007-10-04  2:21         ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-04  2:21           ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-04  5:03           ` David Chinner
2007-10-05  3:36             ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-05  3:36               ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-05  7:41               ` David Chinner
2007-10-05 11:55                 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-10-05 11:55                   ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7370.7646.qm@web32603.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=knobi@knobisoft.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrubin@google.com \
    --cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.