From: Yihang Li <liyihang9@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
<jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<prime.zeng@huawei.com>, <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
<liyihang9@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Allocation SMP request is aligned to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:59:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75df3e2d-10c3-5370-3cd8-fe2fb0ff2acc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgUPpwhkE9bRwHec@infradead.org>
On 2024/3/28 14:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:32:09PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>>>> + u8 *p;
>>>> +
>>>> + size = ALIGN(size, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN);
>>
>>
>> If this is a hisi_sas requirement, then why use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN and not
>> 16B as minimum alignment?
>>
>> Or are we really talking about an arch requirement?
>
> One thing is that we should never allocate unaligned memory for
> anything DMA mapped, or data will be corrupted by non-coherent DMA.
> So ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN needs to be here. If specific hardware has
> further requirements we'll need to communicated it through a field
> or op vector.
Got it. Looks like it's still going to be aligned to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN.
Thanks,
Yihang
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 12:43 [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Allocation SMP request is aligned to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN Yihang Li
2024-03-26 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-26 13:32 ` John Garry
2024-03-26 13:40 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 6:59 ` Yihang Li [this message]
2024-03-28 7:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 7:36 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-28 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-28 8:00 ` Yihang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75df3e2d-10c3-5370-3cd8-fe2fb0ff2acc@huawei.com \
--to=liyihang9@huawei.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@huawei.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.