From: ciaby <ciaby@autistici.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:51:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7688fdc041a8f848b0627dccccddcf12@localhost> (raw)
I already sent this patch, but seems that nobody cared... the last 2
revisions of the -rt kernel don't compile properly.
Second patch to fix this.
Regards
Giovanni "ciaby" Civardi
diff -uNr linux-2.6.25.4-rt6.orig/kernel/sched.c
linux-2.6.25.4-rt6/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.25.4-rt6.orig/kernel/sched.c 2008-06-09
11:35:57.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25.4-rt6/kernel/sched.c 2008-06-09 11:40:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -672,6 +672,13 @@
*/
#define RUNTIME_INF ((u64)~0ULL)
+static u64 global_rt_runtime(void)
+{
+ if (sysctl_sched_rt_period < 0)
+ return RUNTIME_INF;
+ return (u64)sysctl_sched_rt_runtime * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+}
+
/*
* We really dont want to do anything complex within switch_to()
* on PREEMPT_RT - this check enforces this.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ciaby <ciaby@autistici.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:51:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7688fdc041a8f848b0627dccccddcf12@localhost> (raw)
I already sent this patch, but seems that nobody cared... the last 2
revisions of the -rt kernel don't compile properly.
Second patch to fix this.
Regards
Giovanni "ciaby" Civardi
diff -uNr linux-2.6.25.4-rt6.orig/kernel/sched.c
linux-2.6.25.4-rt6/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.25.4-rt6.orig/kernel/sched.c 2008-06-09
11:35:57.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25.4-rt6/kernel/sched.c 2008-06-09 11:40:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -672,6 +672,13 @@
*/
#define RUNTIME_INF ((u64)~0ULL)
+static u64 global_rt_runtime(void)
+{
+ if (sysctl_sched_rt_period < 0)
+ return RUNTIME_INF;
+ return (u64)sysctl_sched_rt_runtime * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+}
+
/*
* We really dont want to do anything complex within switch_to()
* on PREEMPT_RT - this check enforces this.
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-09 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-09 9:51 ciaby [this message]
2008-06-09 9:51 ` [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c ciaby
[not found] ` <a3d4028e0806090255x7301df1kd2c0fbc9d1e678c1@mail.gmail.com>
2008-06-09 10:08 ` ciaby
2008-06-09 12:54 ` Tarkan Erimer
2008-06-09 18:02 ` Daniel Walker
2008-06-13 10:07 ` ciaby
2008-06-13 10:07 ` ciaby
2008-06-13 19:23 ` Daniel Walker
2008-06-23 22:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-24 1:30 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7688fdc041a8f848b0627dccccddcf12@localhost \
--to=ciaby@autistici.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.