From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 : NFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:52:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <771950784.20140211165215@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210195402.GA3924@kernel.dk>
Hi Konrad,
Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens on top of it .. and I encoutered this one:
[ 438.029756] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[ 438.029759] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[ 438.029760] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 438.029770] CPU: 3 PID: 9593 Comm: blkback.2.xvda Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc2-20140211-pcireset-net-btrevert-xenblock+ #1
[ 438.029773] Hardware name: MSI MS-7640/890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640) , BIOS V1.8B1 09/13/2010
[ 438.029784] ffff88005224c4f0 ffff88004e5d9b68 ffffffff81b808c4 ffff88004ba2b510
[ 438.029791] 0000000000000002 ffff88004e5d9c38 ffffffff81116eab ffff88004e5d9bf8
[ 438.029798] ffffffff81117b35 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff82cee570
[ 438.029799] Call Trace:
[ 438.029815] [<ffffffff81b808c4>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 438.029826] [<ffffffff81116eab>] __lock_acquire+0x1c2b/0x2220
[ 438.029833] [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
[ 438.029841] [<ffffffff81117b0d>] lock_acquire+0xbd/0x150
[ 438.029847] [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
[ 438.029852] [<ffffffff810e599d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x290
[ 438.029856] [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
[ 438.029863] [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
[ 438.029872] [<ffffffff816fef01>] ? xen_blkif_schedule+0x1a1/0x8d0
[ 438.029881] [<ffffffff81b8ae0d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6d/0x90
[ 438.029888] [<ffffffff8111392b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfb/0x240
[ 438.029894] [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 438.029901] [<ffffffff816fefe9>] xen_blkif_schedule+0x289/0x8d0
[ 438.029907] [<ffffffff8110d510>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[ 438.029913] [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 438.029919] [<ffffffff81b8ae21>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x81/0x90
[ 438.029925] [<ffffffff816fed60>] ? xen_blkif_be_int+0x40/0x40
[ 438.029932] [<ffffffff810ee374>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
[ 438.029938] [<ffffffff81b8afe0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[ 438.029946] [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[ 438.029951] [<ffffffff81b8c1fc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 438.029958] [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
Doesn't seem to serious .. but never the less :-)
--
Sander
Monday, February 10, 2014, 8:54:02 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Hey Jens,
>>
>> Please git pull the following branch:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git stable/for-jens-3.14
>>
>> which is based off v3.13-rc6. If you would like me to rebase it on
>> a different branch/tag I would be more than happy to do so.
> Older is fine, it's only an issue if you are ahead of the branch you
> want to go into.
dd>>
>> The patches are all bug-fixes and hopefully can go in 3.14.
>>
>> They deal with xen-blkback shutdown and cause memory leaks
>> as well as shutdown races. They should go to stable tree and if you
>> are OK with I will ask them to backport those fixes.
>>
>> There is also a fix to xen-blkfront to deal with unexpected state
>> transition. And lastly a fix to the header where it was using the
>> __aligned__ unnecessarily.
> Pulled!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 : NFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:52:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <771950784.20140211165215@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210195402.GA3924@kernel.dk>
Hi Konrad,
Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens on top of it .. and I encoutered this one:
[ 438.029756] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[ 438.029759] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[ 438.029760] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 438.029770] CPU: 3 PID: 9593 Comm: blkback.2.xvda Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc2-20140211-pcireset-net-btrevert-xenblock+ #1
[ 438.029773] Hardware name: MSI MS-7640/890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640) , BIOS V1.8B1 09/13/2010
[ 438.029784] ffff88005224c4f0 ffff88004e5d9b68 ffffffff81b808c4 ffff88004ba2b510
[ 438.029791] 0000000000000002 ffff88004e5d9c38 ffffffff81116eab ffff88004e5d9bf8
[ 438.029798] ffffffff81117b35 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff82cee570
[ 438.029799] Call Trace:
[ 438.029815] [<ffffffff81b808c4>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 438.029826] [<ffffffff81116eab>] __lock_acquire+0x1c2b/0x2220
[ 438.029833] [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
[ 438.029841] [<ffffffff81117b0d>] lock_acquire+0xbd/0x150
[ 438.029847] [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
[ 438.029852] [<ffffffff810e599d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x290
[ 438.029856] [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
[ 438.029863] [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
[ 438.029872] [<ffffffff816fef01>] ? xen_blkif_schedule+0x1a1/0x8d0
[ 438.029881] [<ffffffff81b8ae0d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6d/0x90
[ 438.029888] [<ffffffff8111392b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfb/0x240
[ 438.029894] [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 438.029901] [<ffffffff816fefe9>] xen_blkif_schedule+0x289/0x8d0
[ 438.029907] [<ffffffff8110d510>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[ 438.029913] [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 438.029919] [<ffffffff81b8ae21>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x81/0x90
[ 438.029925] [<ffffffff816fed60>] ? xen_blkif_be_int+0x40/0x40
[ 438.029932] [<ffffffff810ee374>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
[ 438.029938] [<ffffffff81b8afe0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[ 438.029946] [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[ 438.029951] [<ffffffff81b8c1fc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 438.029958] [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
Doesn't seem to serious .. but never the less :-)
--
Sander
Monday, February 10, 2014, 8:54:02 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Hey Jens,
>>
>> Please git pull the following branch:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git stable/for-jens-3.14
>>
>> which is based off v3.13-rc6. If you would like me to rebase it on
>> a different branch/tag I would be more than happy to do so.
> Older is fine, it's only an issue if you are ahead of the branch you
> want to go into.
dd>>
>> The patches are all bug-fixes and hopefully can go in 3.14.
>>
>> They deal with xen-blkback shutdown and cause memory leaks
>> as well as shutdown races. They should go to stable tree and if you
>> are OK with I will ask them to backport those fixes.
>>
>> There is also a fix to xen-blkfront to deal with unexpected state
>> transition. And lastly a fix to the header where it was using the
>> __aligned__ unnecessarily.
> Pulled!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 18:44 [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-10 19:54 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-11 15:52 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2014-02-11 15:52 ` [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 : NFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-11 16:07 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 16:07 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 17:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-11 17:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-11 17:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-11 17:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-11 18:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-11 18:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-02-11 18:21 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-11 18:21 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-11 20:21 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 20:21 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-02-11 21:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Jens Axboe
2014-02-12 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-12 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=771950784.20140211165215@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.