All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roger Lu <roger.lu@mediatek.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Jin Xiaoyun <jinxiaoyun2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: SVS: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for svs_pm_ops
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:25:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <782e345f-1f15-c65b-9ff1-3da3e0ecd7fc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92d0d361-7d04-150c-97f2-3e073945a210@gmail.com>



On 23/06/2022 14:04, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/06/2022 19:56, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> When building this driver for an architecture that does not support
>> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, such as hexagon, the following warnings occur:
>>
>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1481:12: error: unused function 
>> 'svs_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>    static int svs_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>               ^
>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1515:12: error: unused function 'svs_resume' 
>> [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>    static int svs_resume(struct device *dev)
>>               ^
>>    2 errors generated.
>>
>> This happens because SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS uses SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS,
>> which evaluates to nothing when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, leaving the
>> functions unused in the eyes of the compiler.
>>
>> This problem was rectified in commit 1a3c7bb08826 ("PM: core: Add new
>> *_PM_OPS macros, deprecate old ones") with new macros. Use
>> DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS to fix the warning while not changing
>> svs_pm_ops when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.
>>
>> Fixes: 681a02e95000 ("soc: mediatek: SVS: introduce MTK SVS engine")
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for the patch. The same issue was addressed by Jin Xiayun here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20220623030931.2816013-1-jinxiaoyun2@huawei.com/T/#u 
> 
> 
> I'm happy for any review help.
> 

As there was no progress on the other patch, I now applied yours.

Thanks!
Matthias

> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> index 606a00a2e57d..d70903f45ddf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> @@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ static int svs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(svs_pm_ops, svs_suspend, svs_resume);
>> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(svs_pm_ops, svs_suspend, svs_resume);
>>   static struct platform_driver svs_driver = {
>>       .probe    = svs_probe,
>>
>> base-commit: 71eaf1887203d0a59c92fd9dd3436b8d8489d68c


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roger Lu <roger.lu@mediatek.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Jin Xiaoyun <jinxiaoyun2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: SVS: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for svs_pm_ops
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:25:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <782e345f-1f15-c65b-9ff1-3da3e0ecd7fc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92d0d361-7d04-150c-97f2-3e073945a210@gmail.com>



On 23/06/2022 14:04, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/06/2022 19:56, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> When building this driver for an architecture that does not support
>> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, such as hexagon, the following warnings occur:
>>
>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1481:12: error: unused function 
>> 'svs_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>    static int svs_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>               ^
>>    drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1515:12: error: unused function 'svs_resume' 
>> [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>    static int svs_resume(struct device *dev)
>>               ^
>>    2 errors generated.
>>
>> This happens because SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS uses SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS,
>> which evaluates to nothing when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, leaving the
>> functions unused in the eyes of the compiler.
>>
>> This problem was rectified in commit 1a3c7bb08826 ("PM: core: Add new
>> *_PM_OPS macros, deprecate old ones") with new macros. Use
>> DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS to fix the warning while not changing
>> svs_pm_ops when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.
>>
>> Fixes: 681a02e95000 ("soc: mediatek: SVS: introduce MTK SVS engine")
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for the patch. The same issue was addressed by Jin Xiayun here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20220623030931.2816013-1-jinxiaoyun2@huawei.com/T/#u 
> 
> 
> I'm happy for any review help.
> 

As there was no progress on the other patch, I now applied yours.

Thanks!
Matthias

> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> index 606a00a2e57d..d70903f45ddf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
>> @@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ static int svs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(svs_pm_ops, svs_suspend, svs_resume);
>> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(svs_pm_ops, svs_suspend, svs_resume);
>>   static struct platform_driver svs_driver = {
>>       .probe    = svs_probe,
>>
>> base-commit: 71eaf1887203d0a59c92fd9dd3436b8d8489d68c

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-07  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22 17:56 [PATCH] soc: mediatek: SVS: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for svs_pm_ops Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-22 17:56 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-23 12:04 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-06-23 12:04   ` Matthias Brugger
2022-07-07  8:25   ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2022-07-07  8:25     ` Matthias Brugger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=782e345f-1f15-c65b-9ff1-3da3e0ecd7fc@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=jinxiaoyun2@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=roger.lu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.