Re: Errors attempting to build AT91SAM9x5 BSP

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Tuesday 13 November 2012 12:46:42 Bryan Evenson wrote:
> Here is the original bblayers.conf file before I started creating my BSP:
> 
> # LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time build/conf/bblayers.conf
> # changes incompatibly
> LCONF_VERSION = "6"
> 
> BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}"
> BBFILES ?= ""
> 
> BBLAYERS ?= " \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta-yocto \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta-yocto-bsp \
>   "
> 
> And here is what it looks like after adding my BSP layer:
> 
> # LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time build/conf/bblayers.conf
> # changes incompatibly
> LCONF_VERSION = "7"
> 
> BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}"
> BBFILES ?= ""
> 
> BBLAYERS ?= " \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta-yocto \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta-yocto-bsp \
>   /media/sda3/yocto/poky-danny-8.0/meta-intellihood-qemu \
>   "
> 
> Although, I just tried building again after changing the LCONF_VERSION back
> down to 6, and this time bitbake operates.  I know I'd tried that before
> and it hadn't worked.  The only difference that I can think of is that I've
> closed my terminal window and reopened it since my first posting and this
> one, which means I had to re-source the oe-init-build-env script.  Is it
> possible that this was causing my problems from before?

You shouldn't increase LCONF_VERSION unless LAYER_CONF_VERSION increases, and 
certainly it shouldn't be increased beyond the value of LAYER_CONF_VERSION 
(currently this is 6 in meta-yocto, 5 in OE-Core); why it would be telling you 
it had updated it if you did do that I don't know, that's certainly not 
intended behaviour.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre