From: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: shshaikh@marvell.com, jdenham@redhat.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, manishc@marvell.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, outreachy@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
sbrivio@redhat.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, roopa@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:51:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78823e29-02b2-e052-e8bb-12bbe692db6a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2204250808280.2759@hadrien>
On ٢٥/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٠٨:١١, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2022, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>
>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٥٥, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٠٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>>>> all related methods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> changes in V3:
>>>>>> fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr
>>>>>> __always_unused *tb[],
>>>>>> static int
>>>>>> ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> - __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>>>> + __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +
>>>>> What's changed here?
>>>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;" and you
>>>> said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
>>> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
>> No, I didn't.
> OK, so what is the answer to the question about what changed? It looks
> like you remove a blank line and then add it back. But that should not
> show up as a difference when you generate the patch.
>
> When you answer a comment, please put a blank line before and after your
> answer. Otherwise it can be hard to see your answer when it is in the
> middle of a larger patch.
>
>>> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes, more so
>>> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
>> Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
> A series? But it is not clear that any change is needed here at all.
>
> julia
I understood but I mean how to create the patch without this but I will
google it , Thanks Julia.
>
>>>>>> if (ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) {
>>>>>> netdev_err(dev, "FDB only supports static addresses\n");
>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> index 247bc105bdd2..e07c64e3159c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> @@ -774,14 +774,14 @@ static int ocelot_port_fdb_add(struct ndmsg
>>>>>> *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr
>>>>>> *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
>>>>>> struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
>>>>>> int port = priv->chip_port;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid,
>>>>>> ocelot_port->bridge);
>>>>>> + return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid,
>>>>>> ocelot_port->bridge, extack);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int ocelot_port_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> index d320567b2cca..51fa23418f6a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int qlcnic_set_mac(struct net_device
>>>>>> *netdev, void *p)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int qlcnic_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *netdev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct qlcnic_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>>>> int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> index 069e8824c264..ffd34d9f7049 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int macvlan_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
>>>>>> struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int macvlan_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> int err = -EINVAL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> index de97ff98d36e..cf2f60037340 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ int __vxlan_fdb_delete(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>>>>>> /* Delete entry (via netlink) */
>>>>>> static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> union vxlan_addr ip;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> index 28ea4f8269d4..d0d2a8f33c73 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> @@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>>>>>> struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> - u16 vid);
>>>>>> + u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>>> int (*ndo_fdb_dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct netlink_callback *cb,
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> index 6ccda68bd473..5bfce2e9a553 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_delete(struct net_bridge
>>>>>> *br,
>>>>>> /* Remove neighbor entry with RTM_DELNEIGH */
>>>>>> int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack
>>>>>> *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
>>>>>> struct net_bridge_port *p = NULL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> index 18ccc3d5d296..95348c1c9ce5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct
>>>>>> net_bridge_port *source,
>>>>>> const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, unsigned long
>>>>>> flags);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> - struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16
>>>>>> vid);
>>>>>> + struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>> This is way too long (111 chars) and checkpatch should've complained
>>>>> about it.
>>>>> WARNING: line length of 111 exceeds 100 columns
>>>>> #234: FILE: net/bridge/br_private.h:782:
>>>>> + struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>> I will fix it.
>>>>
>>>>>> int br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *nlh, struct nlattr *tb[], struct
>>>>>> net_device *dev,
>>>>>> const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, u16 nlh_flags,
>>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> index 4041b3e2e8ec..99b30ae58a47 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> @@ -4223,7 +4223,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>>>> const struct net_device_ops *ops = br_dev->netdev_ops;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>>>> - err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>>> + err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid, extack);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (err)
>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>> @@ -4235,7 +4235,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>>>> if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) {
>>>>>> if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>>>> err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr,
>>>>>> - vid);
>>>>>> + vid, extack);
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> err = ndo_dflt_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.36.0
>>>>>>
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:51:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78823e29-02b2-e052-e8bb-12bbe692db6a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2204250808280.2759@hadrien>
On ???/??/???? ??:??, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2022, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>
>> On ??/?/???? ??:??, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>> On ??/?/???? ??:??, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>>>> all related methods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> changes in V3:
>>>>>> ???????? fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c??????? | 4 ++--
>>>>>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c?????????? | 4 ++--
>>>>>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> ? drivers/net/macvlan.c??????????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>>>> ? drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c?????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>>>> ? include/linux/netdevice.h??????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>>>> ? net/bridge/br_fdb.c????????????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>>>> ? net/bridge/br_private.h????????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>>>> ? net/core/rtnetlink.c???????????????????????????? | 4 ++--
>>>>>> ? 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr
>>>>>> __always_unused *tb[],
>>>>>> ? static int
>>>>>> ? ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> ????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> -??????? __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>>>> +??????? __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> ? {
>>>>>> ????? int err;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +
>>>>> What's changed here?
>>>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;" and you
>>>> said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
>>> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
>> No, I didn't.
> OK, so what is the answer to the question about what changed? It looks
> like you remove a blank line and then add it back. But that should not
> show up as a difference when you generate the patch.
>
> When you answer a comment, please put a blank line before and after your
> answer. Otherwise it can be hard to see your answer when it is in the
> middle of a larger patch.
>
>>> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes, more so
>>> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
>> Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
> A series? But it is not clear that any change is needed here at all.
>
> julia
I understood but I mean how to create the patch without this but I will
google it , Thanks Julia.
>
>>>>>> ????? if (ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) {
>>>>>> ????????? netdev_err(dev, "FDB only supports static addresses\n");
>>>>>> ????????? return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> index 247bc105bdd2..e07c64e3159c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> @@ -774,14 +774,14 @@ static int ocelot_port_fdb_add(struct ndmsg
>>>>>> *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr
>>>>>> *tb[],
>>>>>> ???????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> -?????????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> +?????????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> ? {
>>>>>> ????? struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> ????? struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
>>>>>> ????? struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
>>>>>> ????? int port = priv->chip_port;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -??? return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid,
>>>>>> ocelot_port->bridge);
>>>>>> +??? return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid,
>>>>>> ocelot_port->bridge, extack);
>>>>>> ? }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? static int ocelot_port_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> index d320567b2cca..51fa23418f6a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int qlcnic_set_mac(struct net_device
>>>>>> *netdev, void *p)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? static int qlcnic_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> ????????????? struct net_device *netdev,
>>>>>> -??????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> +??????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> ? {
>>>>>> ????? struct qlcnic_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>>>> ????? int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> index 069e8824c264..ffd34d9f7049 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int macvlan_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
>>>>>> struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? static int macvlan_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> ???????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> -?????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> +?????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> ? {
>>>>>> ????? struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> ????? int err = -EINVAL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> index de97ff98d36e..cf2f60037340 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ int __vxlan_fdb_delete(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>>>>>> ? /* Delete entry (via netlink) */
>>>>>> ? static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> ????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> -??????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> +??????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> ? {
>>>>>> ????? struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> ????? union vxlan_addr ip;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> index 28ea4f8269d4..d0d2a8f33c73 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> @@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>>>>>> ???????????????????????????? struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> ???????????????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> ???????????????????????????? const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> -?????????????????????????? u16 vid);
>>>>>> +?????????????????????????? u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>>> ????? int??????????? (*ndo_fdb_dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> ????????????????????????? struct netlink_callback *cb,
>>>>>> ????????????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> index 6ccda68bd473..5bfce2e9a553 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_delete(struct net_bridge
>>>>>> *br,
>>>>>> ? /* Remove neighbor entry with RTM_DELNEIGH */
>>>>>> ? int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> ??????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> -????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> +????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack
>>>>>> *extack)
>>>>>> ? {
>>>>>> ????? struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
>>>>>> ????? struct net_bridge_port *p = NULL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> index 18ccc3d5d296..95348c1c9ce5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct
>>>>>> net_bridge_port *source,
>>>>>> ???????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, unsigned long
>>>>>> flags);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> -????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16
>>>>>> vid);
>>>>>> +????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>> This is way too long (111 chars) and checkpatch should've complained
>>>>> about it.
>>>>> WARNING: line length of 111 exceeds 100 columns
>>>>> #234: FILE: net/bridge/br_private.h:782:
>>>>> +????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>> I will fix it.
>>>>
>>>>>> ? int br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *nlh, struct nlattr *tb[], struct
>>>>>> net_device *dev,
>>>>>> ???????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, u16 nlh_flags,
>>>>>> ???????????? struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> index 4041b3e2e8ec..99b30ae58a47 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> @@ -4223,7 +4223,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>>>> ????????? const struct net_device_ops *ops = br_dev->netdev_ops;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ????????? if (ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>>>> -??????????? err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>>> +??????????? err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid, extack);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ????????? if (err)
>>>>>> ????????????? goto out;
>>>>>> @@ -4235,7 +4235,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>>>> ????? if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) {
>>>>>> ????????? if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>>>> ????????????? err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr,
>>>>>> -?????????????????????????????? vid);
>>>>>> +?????????????????????????????? vid, extack);
>>>>>> ????????? else
>>>>>> ????????????? err = ndo_dflt_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.36.0
>>>>>>
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev,
roopa@nvidia.com, jdenham@redhat.com, sbrivio@redhat.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, shshaikh@marvell.com,
manishc@marvell.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:51:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78823e29-02b2-e052-e8bb-12bbe692db6a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2204250808280.2759@hadrien>
On ٢٥/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٠٨:١١, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2022, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>
>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٥٥, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>> On ٢٤/٤/٢٠٢٢ ٢١:٠٢, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>>>> all related methods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> changes in V3:
>>>>>> fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr
>>>>>> __always_unused *tb[],
>>>>>> static int
>>>>>> ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> - __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>>>> + __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> int err;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +
>>>>> What's changed here?
>>>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;" and you
>>>> said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
>>> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
>> No, I didn't.
> OK, so what is the answer to the question about what changed? It looks
> like you remove a blank line and then add it back. But that should not
> show up as a difference when you generate the patch.
>
> When you answer a comment, please put a blank line before and after your
> answer. Otherwise it can be hard to see your answer when it is in the
> middle of a larger patch.
>
>>> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes, more so
>>> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
>> Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
> A series? But it is not clear that any change is needed here at all.
>
> julia
I understood but I mean how to create the patch without this but I will
google it , Thanks Julia.
>
>>>>>> if (ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) {
>>>>>> netdev_err(dev, "FDB only supports static addresses\n");
>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> index 247bc105bdd2..e07c64e3159c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>>>> @@ -774,14 +774,14 @@ static int ocelot_port_fdb_add(struct ndmsg
>>>>>> *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr
>>>>>> *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
>>>>>> struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
>>>>>> int port = priv->chip_port;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid,
>>>>>> ocelot_port->bridge);
>>>>>> + return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid,
>>>>>> ocelot_port->bridge, extack);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int ocelot_port_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> index d320567b2cca..51fa23418f6a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int qlcnic_set_mac(struct net_device
>>>>>> *netdev, void *p)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int qlcnic_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *netdev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct qlcnic_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>>>> int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> index 069e8824c264..ffd34d9f7049 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>>>> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int macvlan_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
>>>>>> struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int macvlan_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> int err = -EINVAL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> index de97ff98d36e..cf2f60037340 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>>>> @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ int __vxlan_fdb_delete(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>>>>>> /* Delete entry (via netlink) */
>>>>>> static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct
>>>>>> netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>>> union vxlan_addr ip;
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> index 28ea4f8269d4..d0d2a8f33c73 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>>>> @@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>>>>>> struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> const unsigned char *addr,
>>>>>> - u16 vid);
>>>>>> + u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>>> int (*ndo_fdb_dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct netlink_callback *cb,
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> index 6ccda68bd473..5bfce2e9a553 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_delete(struct net_bridge
>>>>>> *br,
>>>>>> /* Remove neighbor entry with RTM_DELNEIGH */
>>>>>> int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>> - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>>>> + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack
>>>>>> *extack)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
>>>>>> struct net_bridge_port *p = NULL;
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> index 18ccc3d5d296..95348c1c9ce5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>>>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct
>>>>>> net_bridge_port *source,
>>>>>> const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, unsigned long
>>>>>> flags);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>>> - struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16
>>>>>> vid);
>>>>>> + struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>> This is way too long (111 chars) and checkpatch should've complained
>>>>> about it.
>>>>> WARNING: line length of 111 exceeds 100 columns
>>>>> #234: FILE: net/bridge/br_private.h:782:
>>>>> + struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>> I will fix it.
>>>>
>>>>>> int br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *nlh, struct nlattr *tb[], struct
>>>>>> net_device *dev,
>>>>>> const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, u16 nlh_flags,
>>>>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> index 4041b3e2e8ec..99b30ae58a47 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>>>> @@ -4223,7 +4223,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>>>> const struct net_device_ops *ops = br_dev->netdev_ops;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>>>> - err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>>> + err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid, extack);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (err)
>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>> @@ -4235,7 +4235,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>>>> if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) {
>>>>>> if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>>>> err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr,
>>>>>> - vid);
>>>>>> + vid, extack);
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> err = ndo_dflt_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.36.0
>>>>>>
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-24 12:09 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] propagate extack to vxlan_fdb_delete Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:02 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:02 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:49 ` [Bridge] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:49 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:55 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:55 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 21:09 ` [Bridge] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 21:09 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 21:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 21:52 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 21:52 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 21:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-25 11:47 ` [Bridge] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 11:47 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 11:47 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 6:11 ` [Bridge] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-25 6:11 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-25 6:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-25 11:51 ` Alaa Mohamed [this message]
2022-04-25 11:51 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 11:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 6:12 ` [Bridge] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-25 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-25 6:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: vxlan: vxlan_core.c: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 16:15 ` [Bridge] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 16:15 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 16:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 18:52 ` [Bridge] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 18:52 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 18:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 18:56 ` [Bridge] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 18:56 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 18:59 ` [Bridge] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 18:59 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 18:59 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:03 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:03 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:20 ` [Bridge] " Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:20 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alaa Mohamed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78823e29-02b2-e052-e8bb-12bbe692db6a@gmail.com \
--to=eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com \
--cc=GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jdenham@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manishc@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=shshaikh@marvell.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.