From: Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hanguangjiang@lixiang.com
Cc: osandov@fb.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: sched: observed instability under stress in 6.12 and mainline
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:51:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cd74213-5654-aac0-54d0-4f4b1a7f0fef@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87254ef1-fa58-4747-b2e1-5c85ecde15bf@windriver.com>
On 2025/9/5 00:33, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to draw the attention of the scheduler maintainers to a number
> of kernel bugzilla reports submitted by a colleague a couple of weeks ago:
>
> 6.12.18:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220447
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220448
>
> v6.16-rt3
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220450
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220449
>
> There seems to be something wrong with either the logic or the locking.
> In one case this resulted in a NULL pointer dereference in
> pick_next_entity(). In another case it resulted in
> BUG_ON(!rq->nr_running) in dequeue_top_rt_rq() and
> SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq) in update_entity_lag().
>
> My colleague suggests that the NULL pointer dereference may be due to
> pick_eevdf() returning NULL in pick_next_entity().
>
> I did some digging and found that
> https://gitlab.com/linux-kernel/stable/-/commit/86b37810 would not have
> been included in 6.12.18, but the equivalent fix should have been in the
> 6.16 load.
>
> We haven't yet bottomed out the root cause.
>
> Any suggestions or assistance would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
Maybe this patch can be useful for your problem.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_3177343A3163451463643E434C61911B4208@qq.com/
If I understand correctly, we may dequeue_entity twice in
rt_mutex_setprio()/__sched_setscheduler(). cfs_bandwidth may break the
state of p->on_rq and se->on_rq.
Thanks,
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 16:33 sched: observed instability under stress in 6.12 and mainline Chris Friesen
2025-09-08 1:51 ` Hao Jia [this message]
2025-09-08 2:22 ` Hao Jia
2025-10-13 3:03 ` Jiping Ma
2025-10-13 5:54 ` Hao Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cd74213-5654-aac0-54d0-4f4b1a7f0fef@gmail.com \
--to=jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=hanguangjiang@lixiang.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.