All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: osandov@fb.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: sched: observed instability under stress in 6.12 and mainline
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:33:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87254ef1-fa58-4747-b2e1-5c85ecde15bf@windriver.com> (raw)

Hi,

I'd like to draw the attention of the scheduler maintainers to a number 
of kernel bugzilla reports submitted by a colleague a couple of weeks ago:

6.12.18:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220447
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220448

v6.16-rt3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220450
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220449

There seems to be something wrong with either the logic or the locking. 
In one case this resulted in a NULL pointer dereference in 
pick_next_entity().  In another case it resulted in 
BUG_ON(!rq->nr_running) in dequeue_top_rt_rq() and 
SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq) in update_entity_lag().

My colleague suggests that the NULL pointer dereference may be due to 
pick_eevdf() returning NULL in pick_next_entity().

I did some digging and found that 
https://gitlab.com/linux-kernel/stable/-/commit/86b37810 would not have 
been included in 6.12.18, but the equivalent fix should have been in the 
6.16 load.

We haven't yet bottomed out the root cause.

Any suggestions or assistance would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Chris


             reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-04 16:33 Chris Friesen [this message]
2025-09-08  1:51 ` sched: observed instability under stress in 6.12 and mainline Hao Jia
2025-09-08  2:22   ` Hao Jia
2025-10-13  3:03   ` Jiping Ma
2025-10-13  5:54     ` Hao Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87254ef1-fa58-4747-b2e1-5c85ecde15bf@windriver.com \
    --to=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.