From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: Improve a size determination in __set_phys_to_machine_multi()
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 21:05:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f2ec975-9a2b-132d-77f0-559fd7eadc30@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b9230f4-0f00-e019-75b4-571e29b52998@users.sourceforge.net>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:50:55 +0200
Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
arch/arm/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
index 0ed01f2d5ee4..11e78432b663 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
@@ -144,5 +144,5 @@ bool __set_phys_to_machine_multi(unsigned long pfn,
return true;
}
- p2m_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xen_p2m_entry), GFP_NOWAIT);
+ p2m_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*p2m_entry), GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!p2m_entry) {
--
2.13.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: Improve a size determination in __set_phys_to_machine_multi()
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:05:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f2ec975-9a2b-132d-77f0-559fd7eadc30@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b9230f4-0f00-e019-75b4-571e29b52998@users.sourceforge.net>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:50:55 +0200
Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
arch/arm/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
index 0ed01f2d5ee4..11e78432b663 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
@@ -144,5 +144,5 @@ bool __set_phys_to_machine_multi(unsigned long pfn,
return true;
}
- p2m_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xen_p2m_entry), GFP_NOWAIT);
+ p2m_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*p2m_entry), GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!p2m_entry) {
--
2.13.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: Improve a size determination in __set_phys_to_machine_multi()
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:05:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f2ec975-9a2b-132d-77f0-559fd7eadc30@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b9230f4-0f00-e019-75b4-571e29b52998@users.sourceforge.net>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:50:55 +0200
Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
arch/arm/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
index 0ed01f2d5ee4..11e78432b663 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c
@@ -144,5 +144,5 @@ bool __set_phys_to_machine_multi(unsigned long pfn,
return true;
}
- p2m_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xen_p2m_entry), GFP_NOWAIT);
+ p2m_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*p2m_entry), GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!p2m_entry) {
--
2.13.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-04 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-04 21:04 [PATCH 0/3] ARM-XEN: Adjustments for __set_phys_to_machine_multi() SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:04 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:05 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-06-04 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: Improve a size determination in __set_phys_to_machine_multi() SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:05 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-05 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-04 21:05 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm/xen: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in __set_phys_to_machine SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm/xen: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in __set_phys_to_machine_multi() SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:06 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-05 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm/xen: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in __set_phys_to_mac Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm/xen: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in __set_phys_to_machine_multi() Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:17 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-04 21:06 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm/xen: Adjust one function call together with a variable assignment SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-04 21:07 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-06-05 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARM-XEN: Adjustments for __set_phys_to_machine_multi() Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-06-05 17:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f2ec975-9a2b-132d-77f0-559fd7eadc30@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.