Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: kprobes: Use arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist()

[James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>]

Hello,

On 15/01/2019 06:25, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Use arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist() instead of
> arch_within_kprobe_blacklist() so that we can see the full
> blacklisted symbols under the debugfs.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index b9e9758b6534..6c066c34c8a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -465,26 +465,30 @@ kprobe_breakpoint_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>  	return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
> +int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
>  {
> -	if ((addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
> -	    addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end) ||
> -	    (addr >= (unsigned long)__entry_text_start &&
> -	    addr < (unsigned long)__entry_text_end) ||
> -	    (addr >= (unsigned long)__idmap_text_start &&
> -	    addr < (unsigned long)__idmap_text_end) ||

> -	    in_exception_text(addr))

You added this one in the previous patch, but it disappears here.


> -		return true;
> -
> -	if (!is_kernel_in_hyp_mode()) {
> -		if ((addr >= (unsigned long)__hyp_text_start &&
> -		    addr < (unsigned long)__hyp_text_end) ||
> -		    (addr >= (unsigned long)__hyp_idmap_text_start &&
> -		    addr < (unsigned long)__hyp_idmap_text_end))
> -			return true;
> -	}
> -
> -	return false;
> +	int ret;


> +	ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start,
> +					(unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

Now that we have arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(), does the arch-code need to
blacklist the kprobes section itself?

The weak arch_within_kprobe_blacklist() will test it at kprobe-load time, and
populate_kprobe_blacklist() adds it to the list before it calls
arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist().

Won't this result in duplicate entries?


> +	ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__entry_text_start,
> +					(unsigned long)__entry_text_end);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

> +	ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__idmap_text_start,
> +					(unsigned long)__idmap_text_end);

> +	if (ret || is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> +		return ret;


Hmmm, I think we have a bug here today.

This is saying we can kprobe KVM when we have VHE, because all of KVMs code runs
at the same exception-level as the kernel. Which is true...
But KVM switches VBAR_EL1, so if we run over one of kprobes BRK instructions,
we're going to hyp-panic, because KVM doesn't handle synchronous exceptions from
EL2.

The __hyp_text also contains the guest entry/exit code, which we mustn't probe,
even on VHE.

I think we should always blacklist the __hyp_text, and KVM should mark its
vhe-only functions with __kprobes. I'll post patches for this.


Thanks,

James


> +	ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__hyp_text_start,
> +					(unsigned long)__hyp_text_end);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__hyp_idmap_text_start,
> +					(unsigned long)__hyp_idmap_text_end);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel